@article{WilbertUrtonKrulletal.2020, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Urton, Karolina and Krull, Johanna and Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Schwalbe, Anja and Hennemann, Thomas}, title = {Teachers' accuracy in estimating social inclusion of students with and without special educational needs}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.598330}, pages = {11}, year = {2020}, abstract = {It is unclear to what extent teachers can accurately assess the social inclusion of their students with and without SEN. The study aims to shed light on these desiderata. Students (N = 1.644) with SEN (learning, behavior, and language problems) and without SEN and their teachers (N = 79) participated in the study. Sociometric peer nominations, students' self-perceived social inclusion, and teachers' assessments regarding students' social inclusion and self-perceived social inclusion were administered. The results suggest that teachers are moderately accurate in identifying social acceptance and social rejection, while accuracy is low when assessing students' self-perceived social inclusion. That said, rating accuracy varied strongly between teachers, ranging from no agreement to a perfect concordance. Teachers seem to be more accurate in estimating the social acceptance of students with learning problems. The results emphasize the importance of differentiating between various social inclusion criteria (i.e., students' self-report vs. peer nominations) and accounting for inter-individual differences in teachers' rating accuracy.}, language = {en} } @article{WilbertKrull2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Krull, Johanna}, title = {Die Bedeutung von Peers f{\"u}r die soziale Teilhabe von Lernenden mit Lern- und Verhaltensauff{\"a}lligkeiten in inklusiven Schulklassen}, series = {Aufwachsen mit Anderen : Peerbeziehungen als Bildungsfaktor}, journal = {Aufwachsen mit Anderen : Peerbeziehungen als Bildungsfaktor}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-036680-0}, pages = {134 -- 149}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @misc{WilbertBoernertRinglebLueke2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and L{\"u}ke, Timo}, title = {Statistical Power of Piecewise Regression Analyses of Single-Case Experimental Studies Addressing Behavior Problems}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {814}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58115}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-581150}, pages = {13}, year = {2022}, abstract = {In intervention research, single-case experimental designs are an important way to gain insights into the causes of individual changes that yield high internal validity. They are commonly applied to examine the effectiveness of classroom-based interventions to reduce problem behavior in schools. At the same time, there is no consensus on good design characteristics of single-case experimental designs when dealing with behavioral problems in schools. Moreover, specific challenges arise concerning appropriate approaches to analyzing behavioral data. Our study addresses the interplay between the test power of piecewise regression analysis and important design specifications of single-case research designs. Here, we focus on the influence of the following specifications of single-case research designs: number of measurement times, the initial frequency of the behavior, intervention effect, and data trend. We conducted a Monte-Carlo study. First, simulated datasets were created with specific design conditions based on reviews of published single-case intervention studies. Following, data were analyzed using piecewise Poisson-regression models, and the influence of specific design specifications on the test power was investigated. Our results indicate that piecewise regressions have a high potential of adequately identifying the effects of interventions for single-case studies. At the same time, test power is strongly related to the specific design specifications of the single-case study: Few measurement times, especially in phase A, and low initial frequencies of the behavior make it impossible to detect even large intervention effects. Research designs with a high number of measurement times show robust power. The insights gained are highly relevant for researchers in the field, as decisions during the early stage of conceptualizing and planning single-case experimental design studies may impact the chance to identify an existing intervention effect during the research process correctly.}, language = {en} } @article{WilbertBoernertRinglebLueke2022, author = {Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and L{\"u}ke, Timo}, title = {Statistical Power of Piecewise Regression Analyses of Single-Case Experimental Studies Addressing Behavior Problems}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne, Schweiz}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2022.917944}, pages = {1 -- 13}, year = {2022}, abstract = {In intervention research, single-case experimental designs are an important way to gain insights into the causes of individual changes that yield high internal validity. They are commonly applied to examine the effectiveness of classroom-based interventions to reduce problem behavior in schools. At the same time, there is no consensus on good design characteristics of single-case experimental designs when dealing with behavioral problems in schools. Moreover, specific challenges arise concerning appropriate approaches to analyzing behavioral data. Our study addresses the interplay between the test power of piecewise regression analysis and important design specifications of single-case research designs. Here, we focus on the influence of the following specifications of single-case research designs: number of measurement times, the initial frequency of the behavior, intervention effect, and data trend. We conducted a Monte-Carlo study. First, simulated datasets were created with specific design conditions based on reviews of published single-case intervention studies. Following, data were analyzed using piecewise Poisson-regression models, and the influence of specific design specifications on the test power was investigated. Our results indicate that piecewise regressions have a high potential of adequately identifying the effects of interventions for single-case studies. At the same time, test power is strongly related to the specific design specifications of the single-case study: Few measurement times, especially in phase A, and low initial frequencies of the behavior make it impossible to detect even large intervention effects. Research designs with a high number of measurement times show robust power. The insights gained are highly relevant for researchers in the field, as decisions during the early stage of conceptualizing and planning single-case experimental design studies may impact the chance to identify an existing intervention effect during the research process correctly.}, language = {en} } @article{UrtonWilbertHennemann2015, author = {Urton, Karolina and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Hennemann, Thomas}, title = {Die Einstellung zur Integration und die Selbstwirksamkeit von Lehrkr{\"a}ften}, series = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis}, volume = {62}, journal = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis}, number = {2}, publisher = {Reinhardt}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0342-183X}, doi = {10.2378/peu2015.art09d}, pages = {147 -- 157}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Studie untersucht an einer Stichprobe integrativ t{\"a}tiger Grundschullehrkr{\"a}fte (N = 618) den Zusammenhang zwischen der individuellen und kollektiven Selbstwirksamkeit sowie den beruflichen Erfahrungen einerseits und der Einstellung zur Integration andererseits. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung zeigen, dass sich die Lehrerkollegien (N = 67) hinsichtlich der Einstellung zur Integration, der individuellen und kollektiven Selbstwirksamkeit sowie der beruflichen Erfahrung im Unterrichten von Kindern mit sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf unterscheiden. Entsprechend unserer Annahmen zeigt sich in einer Mehrebenenanalyse eine bedeutsame Aufkl{\"a}rung der Varianz der Einstellung zur Integration durch die individuelle und kollektive Selbstwirksamkeit sowie die berufliche Erfahrung.}, language = {de} } @article{UrtonBoernetRinglebWilbert2018, author = {Urton, Karolina and B{\"o}rnet-Ringleb, Moritz and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Gestaltung eines inklusiven Schulklimas als Schulentwicklungsaufgabe}, series = {Inklusive Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung : vom Anspruch zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung}, journal = {Inklusive Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung : vom Anspruch zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-032719-1}, pages = {60 -- 75}, year = {2018}, language = {de} } @misc{SchmidtFelisattiAsteretal.2021, author = {Schmidt, Hendrikje and Felisatti, Arianna and Aster, Michael von and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Moers, Arpad von and Fischer, Martin H.}, title = {Neuromuscular Diseases Affect Number Representation and Processing}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52231}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-522312}, pages = {15}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) both are rare genetic neuromuscular diseases with progressive loss of motor ability. The neuromotor developmental course of those diseases is well documented. In contrast, there is only little evidence about characteristics of general and specific cognitive development. In both conditions the final motor outcome is characterized by an inability to move autonomously: children with SMA never accomplish independent motoric exploration of their environment, while children with DMD do but later lose this ability again. These profound differences in developmental pathways might affect cognitive development of SMA vs. DMD children, as cognition is shaped by individual motor experiences. DMD patients show impaired executive functions, working memory, and verbal IQ, whereas only motor ability seems to be impaired in SMA. Advanced cognitive capacity in SMA may serve as a compensatory mechanism for achieving in education, career progression, and social satisfaction. This study aimed to relate differences in basic numerical concepts and arithmetic achievement in SMA and DMD patients to differences in their motor development and resulting sensorimotor and environmental experiences. Horizontal and vertical spatial-numerical associations were explored in SMA/DMD children ranging between 6 and 12 years through the random number generation task. Furthermore, arithmetic skills as well as general cognitive ability were assessed. Groups differed in spatial number processing as well as in arithmetic and domain-general cognitive functions. Children with SMA showed no horizontal and even reversed vertical spatial-numerical associations. Children with DMD on the other hand revealed patterns in spatial numerical associations comparable to healthy developing children. From the embodied Cognition perspective, early sensorimotor experience does play a role in development of mental number representations. However, it remains open whether and how this becomes relevant for the acquisition of higher order cognitive and arithmetic skills.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidtFelisattiAsteretal.2021, author = {Schmidt, Hendrikje and Felisatti, Arianna and Aster, Michael von and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Moers, Arpad von and Fischer, Martin H.}, title = {Neuromuscular diseases affect number representation and processing}, series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697881}, pages = {13}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) both are rare genetic neuromuscular diseases with progressive loss of motor ability. The neuromotor developmental course of those diseases is well documented. In contrast, there is only little evidence about characteristics of general and specific cognitive development. In both conditions the final motor outcome is characterized by an inability to move autonomously: children with SMA never accomplish independent motoric exploration of their environment, while children with DMD do but later lose this ability again. These profound differences in developmental pathways might affect cognitive development of SMA vs. DMD children, as cognition is shaped by individual motor experiences. DMD patients show impaired executive functions, working memory, and verbal IQ, whereas only motor ability seems to be impaired in SMA. Advanced cognitive capacity in SMA may serve as a compensatory mechanism for achieving in education, career progression, and social satisfaction. This study aimed to relate differences in basic numerical concepts and arithmetic achievement in SMA and DMD patients to differences in their motor development and resulting sensorimotor and environmental experiences. Horizontal and vertical spatial-numerical associations were explored in SMA/DMD children ranging between 6 and 12 years through the random number generation task. Furthermore, arithmetic skills as well as general cognitive ability were assessed. Groups differed in spatial number processing as well as in arithmetic and domain-general cognitive functions. Children with SMA showed no horizontal and even reversed vertical spatial-numerical associations. Children with DMD on the other hand revealed patterns in spatial numerical associations comparable to healthy developing children. From the embodied Cognition perspective, early sensorimotor experience does play a role in development of mental number representations. However, it remains open whether and how this becomes relevant for the acquisition of higher order cognitive and arithmetic skills.}, language = {en} } @article{ScherreiksKuhrWilbert2022, author = {Scherreiks, Lynn and Kuhr, Linda and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Ver{\"a}nderung der selbsteingesch{\"a}tzten Kompetenz zur Diagnostik psychischer Auff{\"a}lligkeiten im Psychodiagnostischen Praktikum}, series = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, journal = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, number = {2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57077}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570779}, pages = {171 -- 193}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die diagnostischen Kompetenzen Lehramtsstudierender vor allem in Bezug auf internalisierende Verhaltensbesonderheiten. Da diese h{\"a}ufig weniger Einfluss auf den Verlauf des Schulalltags von Lehrpersonen haben als externalisierendes Erleben und Verhalten von Kindern, werden internalisierende Verhaltensbesonderheiten von Kindern h{\"a}ufig seltener wahrgenommen und seltener als p{\"a}dagogisch relevant eingestuft. Daher erfahren diese Kinder oft weniger f{\"o}rderdiagnostische Unterst{\"u}tzung. Mit dem Ziel der Entwicklung diesbez{\"u}glicher diagnostischer Kompetenzen der Studierenden wird das Psychodiagnostische Praktikum (PDP) mit praktischen Abschnitten und begleitenden Seminarsitzungen zeitgleich zum Praxissemester durchgef{\"u}hrt. Um Ver{\"a}nderungen in der Selbstwahrnehmung der Studierenden in Bezug auf ihre diagnostischen Kompetenzen im Rahmen des PDP abzubilden und damit das Gesamtkonzept zu evaluieren, wird ein selbstentwickelter Fragebogen verwendet. Der Beitrag stellt die konzeptuellen Gedanken des Fragebogens sowie die Ergebnisse einer ersten Pilotstudie vor.}, language = {de} } @misc{KulawiakWilbertSchlacketal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Schlack, Robert and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz}, title = {Prediction of child and adolescent outcomes with broadband and narrowband dimensions of internalizing and externalizing behavior using the child and adolescent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {669}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-48515}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-485156}, pages = {19}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a frequently used screening instrument for behavioral problems in children and adolescents. There is an ongoing controversy—not only in educational research—regarding the factor structure of the SDQ. Research results speak for a 3-factor as well as a 5-factor structure. The narrowband scales (5-factor structure) can be combined into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The question remains: Which factors (narrowband vs. broadband) are better predictors? With the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes (academic grades, well-being, and self-belief), we evaluated whether the broadband scales of internalizing and externalizing behavior (3-factor structure) or narrowband scales of behavior (5-factor structure) are better suited for predictive purposes in a cross-sectional study setting. The sample includes students in grades 5 to 9 (N = 4642) from the representative German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS study). The results of model comparisons (broadband scale vs. narrowband scales) did not support the superiority of the broadband scales with regard to the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes. There is no benefit from subsuming narrowband scales (5-factor structure) into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The application of narrowband scales, providing a more differentiated picture of students' academic and social situation, was more appropriate for predictive purposes. For the purpose of identifying students at risk of struggling in educational contexts, using the set of narrowband dimensions of behavior seems to be more suitable.}, language = {en} } @article{KulawiakWilbertSchlacketal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Schlack, Robert and B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz}, title = {Prediction of child and adolescent outcomes with broadband and narrowband dimensions of internalizing and externalizing behavior using the child and adolescent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire}, series = {PLOS ONE}, volume = {15}, journal = {PLOS ONE}, number = {10}, publisher = {PLOS}, address = {San Francisco, California}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0240312}, pages = {17}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a frequently used screening instrument for behavioral problems in children and adolescents. There is an ongoing controversy—not only in educational research—regarding the factor structure of the SDQ. Research results speak for a 3-factor as well as a 5-factor structure. The narrowband scales (5-factor structure) can be combined into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The question remains: Which factors (narrowband vs. broadband) are better predictors? With the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes (academic grades, well-being, and self-belief), we evaluated whether the broadband scales of internalizing and externalizing behavior (3-factor structure) or narrowband scales of behavior (5-factor structure) are better suited for predictive purposes in a cross-sectional study setting. The sample includes students in grades 5 to 9 (N = 4642) from the representative German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS study). The results of model comparisons (broadband scale vs. narrowband scales) did not support the superiority of the broadband scales with regard to the prediction of child and adolescent outcomes. There is no benefit from subsuming narrowband scales (5-factor structure) into broadband scales (3-factor structure). The application of narrowband scales, providing a more differentiated picture of students' academic and social situation, was more appropriate for predictive purposes. For the purpose of identifying students at risk of struggling in educational contexts, using the set of narrowband dimensions of behavior seems to be more suitable.}, language = {en} } @misc{KulawiakWilbert2019, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Introduction of a new method for representing the sociometric status within the peer group}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {570}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43413}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-434137}, pages = {20}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Sociometrically neglected children are not often liked and not often disliked by their peers. This kind of social information is known as social status. Evidence concerning internalizing behaviour of neglected children is as yet equivocal. Contradictory research results could possibly be attributed to methodological issues of social status classification methods. Therefore, we will paradigmatically emphasize insufficiencies of one social status classification method. Since arbitrary cutoffs (sociometric data) provide the basis for the categorical classification of social status groups, the classification approach lacks precision and consistency. Furthermore, social status classification discounts the multidimensional nature of a child's social status (social status group affiliation is mutually exclusive), disregards between-peer-group differences in the sociometric data, and offers a peer-group-norm-referenced interpretation. By contrast, we will highlight some advantages of the newly introduced social status extreme points procedure, which describes a child's social status in terms of the child's adaptation to sociometric extreme points. The continuous social status extreme points variables offer a criterion-referenced interpretation (multidimensionality: degree of adaptation to each and every sociometric extreme point). The performance and agreement of both methods will be demonstrated using empirical data (N = 316 children within 22 school classes).}, language = {en} } @article{KulawiakUrtonKrulletal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Urton, Karolina and Krull, Johanna and Hennemann, Thomas and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Internalizing Behavior of Sociometrically Neglected Students in Inclusive Primary Classrooms}, series = {frontiers in Education}, volume = {5}, journal = {frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.00032}, pages = {12}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Internalizing problems in children belong to the category of special educational needs called emotional and behavioral difficulties. Recent decades have witnessed a critical discussion about whether children and adolescents experiencing internalizing problems are at risk of being sociometrically neglected (neither liked nor disliked by their peers). Previous studies have shown evidence both for and against the association between internalizing problems and neglected sociometric status. These contradictory results may be due to the following methodological aspects: (1) shortcomings of sociometric status classification methods (arbitrariness of the sociometric classification rules) and (2) different operationalizations of internalizing problems (broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior). The aim of the present study is to investigate empirically whether and to what extent these methodological aspects lead to contradictory results on the internalizing behavior of neglected students. This question is investigated using a sample of students (N = 2334) in German inclusive primary schools. The systematic investigation presented here provides initial indications that the various methodological approaches can lead to conflicting results. The contradictory results are not only due to the application of different sociometric classification methods, but also to different operationalizations of internalizing behavior (narrowband and broadband scales). Earlier contradictory evidence on the internalizing behavior of neglected students must therefore be seen in a different light: the reasons for previously conflicting results may actually be methodological. Based on the results, conclusions are drawn as to how methodological aspects can be given more consideration in sociometric research on internalizing behavior.}, language = {en} } @misc{KulawiakUrtonKrulletal.2020, author = {Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Urton, Karolina and Krull, Johanna and Hennemann, Thomas and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Internalizing Behavior of Sociometrically Neglected Students in Inclusive Primary Classrooms}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {652}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-47452}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-474525}, pages = {14}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Internalizing problems in children belong to the category of special educational needs called emotional and behavioral difficulties. Recent decades have witnessed a critical discussion about whether children and adolescents experiencing internalizing problems are at risk of being sociometrically neglected (neither liked nor disliked by their peers). Previous studies have shown evidence both for and against the association between internalizing problems and neglected sociometric status. These contradictory results may be due to the following methodological aspects: (1) shortcomings of sociometric status classification methods (arbitrariness of the sociometric classification rules) and (2) different operationalizations of internalizing problems (broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior). The aim of the present study is to investigate empirically whether and to what extent these methodological aspects lead to contradictory results on the internalizing behavior of neglected students. This question is investigated using a sample of students (N = 2334) in German inclusive primary schools. The systematic investigation presented here provides initial indications that the various methodological approaches can lead to conflicting results. The contradictory results are not only due to the application of different sociometric classification methods, but also to different operationalizations of internalizing behavior (narrowband and broadband scales). Earlier contradictory evidence on the internalizing behavior of neglected students must therefore be seen in a different light: the reasons for previously conflicting results may actually be methodological. Based on the results, conclusions are drawn as to how methodological aspects can be given more consideration in sociometric research on internalizing behavior.}, language = {en} } @article{KrullWilbertHennemann2018, author = {Krull, Johanna and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Hennemann, Thomas}, title = {Does social exclusion by classmates lead to behaviour problems and learning difficulties or vice versa?}, series = {European journal of special needs education}, volume = {33}, journal = {European journal of special needs education}, number = {2}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0885-6257}, doi = {10.1080/08856257.2018.1424780}, pages = {235 -- 253}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Social participation of pupils with special educational needs (SEN) is a central topic in the current inclusion debate. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of social exclusion is considerably higher for children with SEN compared to their peers without SEN, especially for pupils with behaviour problems (BP) or learning difficulties (LD). Since most of these studies are based on cross-sectional designs, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the direction of the effects. This leads to the question to what extent BP and LD have an impact on pupils' social position in the class and, vice versa, to what extent the social position has an effect on the development of BP and LD. To address these questions, we analysed sociometric data of 1244 primary school children. {\`E} A cross-lagged panel analysis was conducted. The results indicate that BP and LD in 1st grade lead to significantly less social acceptance by peers in 2nd grade but do not predict significantly higher social rejection. A directed influence of LD or BP on a higher social rejection cannot be found. Conversely, neither social acceptance nor social rejection at 1st grade has an influence on the development of BP or LD at grade two.}, language = {en} } @book{JennekRotherToschetal.2022, author = {Jennek, Julia and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Kludt, Steffen and Krauskopf, Karsten and Kitschke, Dorothea and Maar, Verena and Knigge, Michel and Gn{\"a}dig, Susanne and Seidel, Astrid and Siehr, Karl-Heinz and Wienecke, Maik and G{\"u}nther, Claudia-Susanne and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Klöpping, Peter M. and K{\"u}choll, Denise and Lazarides, Rebecca and Westphal, Andrea and Scherreiks, Lynn and Kuhr, Linda and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Gronostaj, Anna and Vock, Miriam and Zaruba, Nicole and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Link, J{\"o}rg-Werner and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Barseghyan, Anahit and Glowinski, Ingrid}, title = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, number = {2}, editor = {Jennek, Julia}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-50096}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-500964}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {321}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Schulpraktika bilden die zentrale Grundlage der Lehrerbildung in Potsdam. Bereits im Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung (1993) sind sie festgehalten, seit der Integration des Schulpraktikums (Praxissemesters) 2008 absolvieren alle Potsdamer Lehramtsstudierenden f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika. W{\"a}hrend die Ziele der Praktika klar beschrieben sind, sind die tats{\"a}chlichen Lernerfolge nicht immer klar - ebenso wenig, wie die Begleitung der Praktika aussehen muss, um die Studierenden bestm{\"o}glich zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Auch die Integration in weitere Lehrveranstaltungen des Studiums ist ein noch offenes Feld, das weiterer Betrachtung verdient. Die unterschiedliche Ausrichtung der Potsdamer Praktika, Perspektivwechsel im Orientierungs-/Integriertem Eingangspraktikum, Selbstreflektion im Praktikum in p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Handlungsfeldern, Unterricht als Profession in den Fachdidaktischen Tagespraktika, Anwendung von Diagnostik im psychodiagnostischen Praktikum und die Synthese all dessen im Schulpraktikum, bieten daf{\"u}r zahlreiche Ansatzpunkte. Schulpraktika sind nicht nur ein zentraler und von Studierenden hoch gesch{\"a}tzter Bestandteil des Studiums, sondern werden auch zunehmend f{\"u}r die Bildungsforschung interessant. Fragen nach der Kompetenzentwicklung, Selbsteinsch{\"a}tzungen und der Entwicklung der Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit von Studierenden stehen dabei ebenso im Fokus wie die Einsch{\"a}tzung der universit{\"a}ren Begleitung und der Einbindung ins weitere Studium. Der vorliegende Band versammelt Studien von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, die die f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika im Lehramtsstudium unter unterschiedlichen Blickwinkel beforschen. Besonders hervorzuheben ist, dass die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen stammen und somit die Praktika mit verschiedenen Instrumenten und aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln betrachten. Die pr{\"a}sentierten Ergebnisse bilden eine gute Grundlage, um die Praktika in Potsdam und an anderen Standorten weiterzuentwickeln.}, language = {de} } @article{HoffmannWilbertLehoferetal.2020, author = {Hoffmann, Lisa and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Lehofer, Mike and Schwab, Susanne}, title = {Are we good friends?}, series = {European Journal of Special Needs Education}, volume = {36}, journal = {European Journal of Special Needs Education}, number = {4}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London}, pages = {16}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Empirical studies already examined various facets of the friendship construct. Building on this, the present study examines the questions of how the number of friendships and their quality differ between students with and without SEN and whether a homophily-effect can be identified. The sample consists of 455 fourth-graders from 28 inclusive classes in Austria. The results indicate that students with SEN have fewer friends than students without SEN. Furthermore, students without SEN preferred peers without SEN as a friend. This homophily-effect was shown for students with SEN, too. However, students with and without SEN rated the quality of their friendships similarly and no interactions between the SEN status of oneself or of the friend was found for the quality of the friendship. The results show that, in the context of inclusion, the issue of friendship needs to be increasingly addressed to improve the situation of students with SEN.}, language = {en} } @misc{HoffmannWilbertLehoferetal.2021, author = {Hoffmann, Lisa and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Lehofer, Mike and Schwab, Susanne}, title = {Are we good friends?}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {4}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52535}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-525351}, pages = {18}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Empirical studies already examined various facets of the friendship construct. Building on this, the present study examines the questions of how the number of friendships and their quality differ between students with and without SEN and whether a homophily-effect can be identified. The sample consists of 455 fourth-graders from 28 inclusive classes in Austria. The results indicate that students with SEN have fewer friends than students without SEN. Furthermore, students without SEN preferred peers without SEN as a friend. This homophily-effect was shown for students with SEN, too. However, students with and without SEN rated the quality of their friendships similarly and no interactions between the SEN status of oneself or of the friend was found for the quality of the friendship. The results show that, in the context of inclusion, the issue of friendship needs to be increasingly addressed to improve the situation of students with SEN.}, language = {en} } @book{HermannsBoehmeMeyeringetal.2023, author = {Hermanns, Jolanda and B{\"o}hme, Katrin and Meyering, Meike and Fuchs, Isabelle and Wagner, Simon and Krauskopf, Karsten and Knigge, Michel and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Wulff, Peter and Mientus, Lukas and Nowak, Anna and Borowski, Andreas and Baer, Ella and Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Br{\"a}sel, Tim and Fenn, Monika and Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Kuzle, Ana and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and Burg, Paula and Lampart, Fabian and Leubner, Martin and Freitag-Hild, Britta and Bitmann, Anna and Reinhardt, Susanne and Roos, Jana and Hußner, Isabell and B{\"o}rner, Dustin and Lazarides, Rebecca and Glowinski, Ingrid and Autenrieth, Marijke and Radke, Thea and Ehlert, Antje and Menke, Anne and Haupenthal, Anna and Schramm, Satyam Antonio and Kruse, Julia and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Fischer, Jakob Thomas and Kayser, Daniela Niesta}, title = {PSI-Potsdam}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung und Bildungsforschung}, number = {3}, editor = {Hermanns, Jolanda}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-568-2}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-60187}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-601875}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {393}, year = {2023}, abstract = {An der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam wird seit 2015 im Rahmen der „Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" das Projekt „Professionalisierung - Schulpraktische Studien - Inklusion" (PSI-Potsdam) durchgef{\"u}hrt und am Zentrum f{\"u}r Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) koordiniert. Zur ersten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2015-2018) erschien der Band „PSI-Potsdam - Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2015-2018)" zum Auftakt der Reihe „Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung". Der vorliegende Band aus der gleichen Reihe gibt in den Kapiteln „Erhebungen", „Lehrkonzepte" und „Vernetzungen" einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber alle Teilprojekte der zweiten Projektf{\"o}rderphase (2019-2023). Wissenschaftler:innen aus verschiedenen Fachdidaktiken, Fachwissenschaften sowie aus den Bildungswissenschaften und der Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik haben im Rahmen des Projektes kooperiert. Sowohl praxisnahe Forschung als auch die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte sowie Strategien zur Vernetzung innerhalb der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung stehen im Fokus dieses Bandes. Die Praxisphasen, die im Rahmen des „Potsdamer Modells der Lehrerbildung" eine zentrale Rolle spielen, wurden in einer großen Studie {\"u}ber alle Praxisphasen untersucht. Der Band gibt interessante Einblicke in die Ergebnisse der Teilprojekte und Anregungen sowohl f{\"u}r die eigene Forschung als auch f{\"u}r Entwicklungsarbeit wie zum Beispiel die Entwicklung neuer Lehrkonzepte. Herausgegeben wird dieser Band von PD Dr. Jolanda Hermanns (Gesamtkoordinatorin PSI-Potsdam und Chemiedidaktikerin).}, language = {de} } @article{GrubertSchwalbeKulawiaketal.2018, author = {Grubert, Jana and Schwalbe, Anja and Kulawiak, Pawel R. and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Seminarkonzept zur F{\"o}rderung inklusionsrelevanter Kompetenzen}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-442-5}, issn = {2626-3556}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420265}, pages = {125 -- 134}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Der Beitrag stellt das im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung entwickelte Seminarkonzept zur Vermittlung diagnostischer Lehrkr{\"a}ftekompetenzen mit Fokus auf internalisierende Verhaltensauff{\"a}lligkeiten von Sch{\"u}ler_innen vor, das bereits in Form des Psychodiagnostischen Praktikums im Studium des Grundschullehramts mit dem Schwerpunkt Inklusionsp{\"a}dagogik an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam umgesetzt wird. Dabei wird das Konzept zun{\"a}chst hinsichtlich der Relevanz f{\"u}r die Ausbildung diagnostischer Kompetenzen angehender Lehrkr{\"a}fte betrachtet, bevor auf den Aufbau und Ablauf der Lehrveranstaltung eingegangen wird. Die Lehrveranstaltung umfasst neben der Vermittlung und Vertiefung von Wissen zur p{\"a}dagogischen Diagnostik die Umsetzung praktischer Aufgaben im Kontext Schule und deren anschließende Analyse und Reflexion, orientiert an wissenschaftlichen Reflexionsmodellen. Abschließend werden bisherige Erfahrungen hinsichtlich der Umsetzung des Seminarkonzepts im Rahmen des Psychodiagnostischen Praktikums berichtet und daraus Gelingensbedingungen f{\"u}r die Lehrveranstaltung formuliert.}, language = {de} }