@article{ZimmermannHerrmann2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska},
  title     = {70 Jahre Genfer Fl{\"u}chtlingskonvention},
  series = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  journal   = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Luchterhand},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln ; Neuwied},
  issn      = {0174-2108},
  pages     = {221 -- 227},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GunnarsonWeissZimmermann2019,
  author    = {Gunnarson, Logi and Weiß, Norman and Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen - Fragen und m{\"o}gliche Antworten nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte},
  series = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen : eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte},
  journal   = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen : eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-3761-1},
  pages     = {7 -- 14},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute : the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqs002},
  pages     = {209 -- 227},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {The adoption, in Kampala in June 2010, of amendments to the Rome Statute on the crime of aggression was hailed as a historic milestone in the development of the international Criminal Court (ICC). However, the manner in which these amendments are supposed to enter into force runs the risk of undermining the rules of the international law of treaties, as well as the legality and acceptability of the Kampala compromise itself The author examines the relevant amendment procedures provided for in the ICC Statute and the compatibility with them of the amendment procedure chosen in Kampala and ultimately warns of the legal consequences which may follow from the Review Conference's somewhat-Alexandrian solution.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2016,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG - ein verfassungsrechtliches Auslaufmodell},
  series = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  publisher = {Kohlhammer},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {0029-859X},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Zur Wiedergutmachung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts garantiert Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG Abk{\"o}mmlingen von in diskriminierender Weise ausgeb{\"u}rgerten Deutschen die deutsche Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit. Dadurch soll der Zustand wiederhergestellt werden, der ohne die Ausb{\"u}rgerung bestehen w{\"u}rde. Daher wird insoweit regelm{\"a}ßig auf das geltende Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht abgestellt. \S 4 Abs. 4 StAG hat im Jahr 2000 eine Beschr{\"a}nkung der Weitergabe der deutschen Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit f{\"u}r im Ausland geborene Kinder deutscher Staatsangeh{\"o}riger eingef{\"u}hrt, die selbst bereits im Ausland geboren wurden. Dadurch wird m{\"o}glicherweise der Anwendungsbereich des Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG dauerhaft signifikant eingeschr{\"a}nkt; unter Umst{\"a}nden wird die Norm gar obsolet. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird das Spannungsverh{\"a}ltnis zwischen der uneingeschr{\"a}nkten Anwendung des \S 4 Abs. 4 StAG mit dem verfassungsrechtlich verb{\"u}rgerten Recht auf Wiedereinb{\"u}rgerung von Kindern zu Unrecht ausgeb{\"u}rgerter Deutscher er{\"o}rtert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2011,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 1 A, para. 2},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-954251-2},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2011,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 1 F},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-954251-2},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannDorschner2011,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Dorschner, Jonas},
  title     = {Article 22},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-954251-2},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2011,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 33, para. 2},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-954251-2},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 35},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannVonMangoldt2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Von Mangoldt, Hermann},
  title     = {Article 53},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannThienel2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Thienel, Tobias},
  title     = {Article 60},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannRoemer2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and R{\"o}mer, Lutz},
  title     = {Artikel 27 Dublin III-Verordnung : das Ende des Konzepts "normativer Vergewisserung"},
  isbn      = {978-3-8114-3914-6},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Bringing Kosovo within the reach of the european convention on human rights : disentangling the convention and the status-issue},
  isbn      = {978-3-16-152628-2},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannBoos2018,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Boos, Felix},
  title     = {Bringing States to Justice for Crimes against Humanity},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqy053},
  pages     = {835 -- 855},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Draft Article 15 of the International Law Commission's project on crimes against humanity — dealing with the settlement of disputes arising from a proposed convention — attempts to strike a balance between state autonomy and robust judicial supervision. It largely follows Article 22 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which renders the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) conditional upon prior negotiations. Hence, the substance of the clause can be interpreted in light of the recent case law of the ICJ, especially in the case Georgia v. Russia. In addition, this contribution discusses several issues regarding the scope ratione temporis of the compromissory clause. It advances several proposals to improve the current draft, addressing its relationship with state responsibility — an explicit reference to which is currently missing — as well as the relationship between the ICJ and a possible treaty body. It also proposes to recalibrate the interplay of the requirement of prior negotiations with, respectively, the possibility of seizing a future treaty body and the indication of provisional measures by the ICJ.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UlfsteinZimmermann2018,
  author    = {Ulfstein, Geir and Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Certiorari through the Back Door?},
  series = {The Law \& Practice of International Courts and Tribunals},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {The Law \& Practice of International Courts and Tribunals},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Brill},
  address   = {Leiden},
  issn      = {1569-1853},
  doi       = {10.1163/15718034-12341381},
  pages     = {289 -- 308},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In its Burmych and Others v. Ukraine judgment of October 2017 the European Court of Human Rights dismissed more than 12,000 applications due to the fact that they were not only repetitive in nature, but also mutatis mutandis identical to applications covered by a previous pilot judgment rendered against Ukraine. This raises fundamental issues as to the role of the Court within the human rights protection system established by the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as those concerning the interrelationship between the Court and the Committee of Ministers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannSener2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sener, Meltem},
  title     = {Chemical weapons and the international criminal court},
  series = {American journal of international law},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {American journal of international law},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {American Society of International Law},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0002-9300},
  doi       = {10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.3.0436},
  pages     = {436 -- 448},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Continuity of states},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-929168-7},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannHenn2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Henn, Elisabeth V.},
  title     = {Das Aggressionsverbrechen und das deutsche Strafrecht},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Das humanit{\"a}re V{\"o}lkerrecht : Befriedung oder Mittel der Akzeptanz kriegerischer Konflikte?},
  isbn      = {978-3-935933-10-0},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}