@article{BaehrensVoigt2019,
  author    = {Baehrens, Konstantin and Voigt, Frank},
  title     = {Die Problemgeschichte wird tats{\"a}chlich zur Geschichte der Probleme},
  series = {Material und Begriff ; Arbeitsverfahren und theoretische Beziehungen Walter Benjamins},
  journal   = {Material und Begriff ; Arbeitsverfahren und theoretische Beziehungen Walter Benjamins},
  publisher = {Argument},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-86754-322-4},
  pages     = {193 -- 242},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Ette2019,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Schreiben zwischen den Welten},
  series = {Europa : die Gegenwart unserer Geschichte ; Band III, Globale Verflechtungen},
  journal   = {Europa : die Gegenwart unserer Geschichte ; Band III, Globale Verflechtungen},
  editor    = {Vogel, Jacob},
  publisher = {wbg Theiss},
  address   = {Darmstadt},
  isbn      = {978-3-8062-4021-4},
  pages     = {419 -- 427},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HaagHoeppner2019,
  author    = {Haag, Johannes and Hoeppner, Till},
  title     = {Denken und Welt - Wege kritischer Metaphysik},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {67},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2019-0006},
  pages     = {76 -- 97},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Wird Metaphysik realistisch verstanden, so ist sie mit dem Anspruch verbunden, in objektiver Weise von der grundlegenden Beschaffenheit und Ordnung der Welt (oder Realit{\"a}t, Wirklichkeit etc.) zu handeln. Damit beansprucht sie die M{\"o}glichkeit von Objektivit{\"a}t, d. h. die M{\"o}glichkeit der Repr{\"a}sentation der grundlegenden Beschaffenheit und Ordnung einer Welt, die von uns und unserer Repr{\"a}sentation verschieden ist. Realistisch verstandene Metaphysik verf{\"a}hrt dogmatisch, wenn sie ihre eigene M{\"o}glichkeit einfach voraussetzt. Eine dogmatische Metaphysik ist unkritisch, weil sie ohne eine Untersuchung der Frage betrieben wird, wie eine objektive und ad{\"a}quate Repr{\"a}sentation der grundlegenden Beschaffenheit und Ordnung der Welt {\"u}berhaupt m{\"o}glich ist. Im Unterschied dazu nennen wir eine realistische Metaphysik in einem vorl{\"a}ufigen Sinne kritisch, sofern sie ihren Ausgang von einer Untersuchung dieser M{\"o}glichkeit nimmt und erst auf der Grundlage positiver Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung einen - vor diesem Hintergrund nunmehr gerechtfertigten - Objektivit{\"a}tsanspruch erhebt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2019,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {How is the Human Life-Form of Mind Really Possible in Nature?},
  series = {Human studies},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Human studies},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0163-8548},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10746-017-9429-5},
  pages     = {47 -- 64},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {J. Dewey and H. Plessner both and independently of one another treated the central question of what new task philosophy must set itself if the assumption is correct that the life-form of mind, i.e., the mental life-form of humans, arose in nature and must also sustain itself in the future within nature. If nature has to reconceived so as to make the irreducible qualities of life and mind truly possible, then it can no longer be restricted to the role of physical material. Conversely humans cannot no longer take on the role of God outside and independent of nature. Instead these philosophers distinguish between three plateaus (Dewey) or stages (Plessner), between physical (inorganic) nature, psycho-physical (living) nature and the nature that is mental life. This distinction is drawn such that a connection between the plateaus is truly possible. The third level, that of the mental form of life, answers mentally within conduct to the break with the first two levels. Hence it depends in the future as well on the continuously renewed difference (between the precarious and the stable for Dewey, between immediacy and mediation for Plessner) in our experience of nature. Within this difference nature as a whole remains an open unknown, which is why we can credit Dewey with a philosophy of diversified and negative holism, Plessner with a differential philosophy of the negativity of the absolute.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Montemayor2019,
  author    = {Montemayor, Carlos},
  title     = {On the human uniqueness of the temporal reasoning system},
  series = {Behavioral and brain sciences : an international journal of current research and theory with open peer commentary},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Behavioral and brain sciences : an international journal of current research and theory with open peer commentary},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0140-525X},
  doi       = {10.1017/S0140525X19000335},
  pages     = {69},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {A central claim by Hoerl \& McCormack is that the temporal reasoning system is uniquely human. But why exactly? This commentary evaluates two possible options to justify the thesis that temporal reasoning is uniquely human, one based on considerations regarding agency and the other based on language. The commentary raises problems for both of these options.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mueller2019,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Christian Th.},
  title     = {Die Kalaschnikow, eine Kriegsikone},
  series = {Europa : die Gegenwart unserer Geschichte ; Band III, Globale Verflechtung},
  journal   = {Europa : die Gegenwart unserer Geschichte ; Band III, Globale Verflechtung},
  editor    = {Vogel, Jakob},
  publisher = {wbg Theiss},
  address   = {Darmstadt},
  isbn      = {978-3-8062-4021-4},
  pages     = {261 -- 264},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Pirwitz2019,
  author    = {Pirwitz, Anne},
  title     = {Romanian Migrants in Western Europe},
  series = {Philologica Jassyensia},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Philologica Jassyensia},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Editura Tracus Arte},
  address   = {Bucharest},
  issn      = {1841-5377},
  pages     = {221 -- 230},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This article aims to sum up the main results of a research project made in 2016 and 2017 about the situation of 1190 Romanian migrants in Western Europe and to give an overview about the push and pull factors, transnational family structures, as well as the challenges and difficulties of the Romanian survey respondents living in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy. It also considers the role of personal networks which represent an important motor of migration and constitute the main motive for the choice of a certain destination region. These migration networks lead to the construction of transnational social spaces between Romania and the destination country and have high influence in the search for housing or jobs but can also influence the integration process abroad.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Rosso2019,
  author    = {Rosso, Enrico},
  title     = {Ein „Zusammengehen ohne Zusammenkommen". Der Entstehungsprozess des intellektuellen Netzwerkes um die Zeitschrift Die Kreatur},
  series = {Naharaim},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Naharaim},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1862-9148},
  doi       = {10.1515/naha-2019-0006},
  pages     = {73 -- 97},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Eine Gruppe, gar eine innerlich verbundene Gemeinschaft, k{\"o}nnen Intellektuelle im Normalfall nur bilden, soweit sie von gleichem Denken und Wollen bewegt werden […]. Wo dagegen die von den Intellektuellen vertretenen Ansichten weit divergieren, da kann es nur unter sehr kritischen Umst{\"a}nden geschehen, daß die verschieden gearteten (sozialen, politischen, rechtlichen, kulturellen, religi{\"o}sen) Standpunkte und Anliegen - auf Zeit - sich zusammenfinden […]. Das polemische Element, das kritischen Intellektuellen ja wesensm{\"a}ßig zu eigen ist, bringt am ehesten eine gemeinsame Front zwischen ihnen zustande.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Rosso2019,
  author    = {Rosso, Enrico},
  title     = {Moskauer Passagen},
  series = {Material und Begriff ; Arbeitsverfahren und theoretische Beziehungen Walter Benjamins},
  journal   = {Material und Begriff ; Arbeitsverfahren und theoretische Beziehungen Walter Benjamins},
  publisher = {Argument},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-86754-322-4},
  pages     = {102 -- 134},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{vonKalckreuth2019,
  author    = {von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander},
  title     = {Wie viel Religionsphilosophie braucht es f{\"u}r eine Philosophie der Person?},
  series = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0028-3517},
  doi       = {10.1515/nzsth-2019-0004},
  pages     = {67 -- 83},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Der vorliegende Beitrag er{\"o}rtert das Verh{\"a}ltnis einer Philo-sophie der Person zur Religionsphilosophie bzw. einer Philosophie religi{\"o}ser Ph{\"a}nomene. Dabei soll die These vertreten werden, dass der personale Lebenszusammenhang bestimmte Ph{\"a}nomene aufweist, die nur in einem religi{\"o}sen Kontext ad{\"a}quat verstanden werden k{\"o}nnen. Die Interpretation dieser Ph{\"a}nomene kann einen Zugang zu bestimmten Aspekten von Personalit{\"a}t erm{\"o}glichen, die von den meisten Persontheorien der Gegenwart kaum beachtet werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{vonKalckreuth2019,
  author    = {von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander},
  title     = {Expansivit{\"a}t, Objektivit{\"a}t und Aktualit{\"a}t des Betroffenseins},
  series = {Horizon : studies in phenomenology : Studien zur Ph{\"a}nomenologie : fenomenologičeskie issledovanija : {\´e}tudes ph{\´e}nom{\´e}nologiques},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Horizon : studies in phenomenology : Studien zur Ph{\"a}nomenologie : fenomenologičeskie issledovanija : {\´e}tudes ph{\´e}nom{\´e}nologiques},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {St. Petersburg University Press},
  address   = {St. Petersburg},
  issn      = {2226-5260},
  doi       = {10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-1-211-229},
  pages     = {211 -- 229},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The aim of this paper is to discuss Nicolai Hartmann's conception of personhood as developed in his philosophy of spiritual being. Many contemporary accounts of personhood are systematically focused on rational phenomena as self-consciousness or practical reasoning, which are understood as 'conditions of personhood'. Apart from having some technical problems, those accounts limit our self-under-standing as persons on distinct rational properties and often fail to consider the sociocultural aspects of the personal situation. Nicolai Hartmann — although respecting the role of reason — understands personhood particularly as participation in a shared spiritual sphere called Objektiver Geist (objective spirit), which includes various intersubjective phenomena as languages, religion, moral, arts, and the sciences. Being part of this sphere seems to be more fundamental than having distinct rational properties, which requests a spiritual frame to be exerted. Further it is shown that Hartmann's ontology of person also includes a notion of being affected by the existential weight of situations and other person's actions — an idea often maintained by phenomenological positions. By regarding rational, intersubjective and affective aspects, Hartmann's philosophy of person succeeds in offering a broad articulation of our self-understanding and may also be seen as providing a background to understand certain phenomena that are part of the personal situation.},
  language  = {de}
}