@article{BarthWeingartenKuettnerRaymond2021, author = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander and Raymond, Chase Wesley}, title = {Pivots revisited}, series = {Open linguistics}, volume = {7}, journal = {Open linguistics}, number = {1}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Warsaw}, issn = {2300-9969}, doi = {10.1515/opli-2020-0152}, pages = {613 -- 637}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The term "pivot" usually refers to two overlapping syntactic units such that the completion of the first unit simultaneously launches the second. In addition, pivots are generally said to be characterized by the smooth prosodic integration of their syntactic parts. This prosodic integration is typically achieved by prosodic-phonetic matching of the pivot components. As research on such turns in a range of languages has illustrated, speakers routinely deploy pivots so as to be able to continue past a point of possible turn completion, in the service of implementing some additional or revised action. This article seeks to build on, and complement, earlier research by exploring two issues in more detail as follows: (1) what exactly do pivotal turn extensions accomplish on the action dimension, and (2) what role does prosodic-phonetic packaging play in this? We will show that pivot constructions not only exhibit various degrees of prosodic-phonetic (non-)integration, i.e., differently strong cesuras, but that they can be ordered on a continuum, and that this cline maps onto the relationship of the actions accomplished by the components of the pivot construction. While tighter prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., weak(er) cesuring, co-occurs with post-pivot actions whose relationship to that of the pre-pivot tends to be rather retrospective in character, looser prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., strong(er) cesuring, is associated with a more prospective orientation of the post-pivot's action. These observations also raise more general questions with regard to the analysis of action.}, language = {en} } @book{KoeserKuettnerKupetzetal.2014, author = {K{\"o}ser, Stephanie and K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander and Kupetz, Maxi and Trouvain, J{\"u}rgen and Truong, Khiet P. and Bose, Ines and Kurtenbach, Stephanie and Szczepek Reed, Beatrice and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth}, title = {Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion}, editor = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Beatrice, Szczepek Reed}, publisher = {Verlag f{\"u}r Gespr{\"a}chsforschung}, address = {Mannheim}, isbn = {978-3-936656-60-2}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Phonetics and prosody have long been recognised as fundamental aspects of spoken discourse. Specifically, the prosody and phonetics of talk-in-interaction have become a field of study in its own right, with the majority of work to date focussing on the structuring of talk, turn-taking, and the contextualization of social practices, actions, genres, styles, affect etc. This volume presents an introduction to basic terms and concepts of prosodic-phonetic research as well as new contributions by young and established researchers in the field, for example, in the area of prosody and phonetics of affect display, public performance, institutional interaction, and sequence organisation. At the same time, it provides a survey of the methods currently employed and is thus aimed at students of language and interaction from a wide range of backgrounds as well as more experienced researchers and novices alike.}, language = {de} } @article{Kuettner2020, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {Tying sequences together with the [that's + wh-clause] format}, series = {Research on language and social interaction}, volume = {53}, journal = {Research on language and social interaction}, number = {2}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {New York}, issn = {0835-1813}, doi = {10.1080/08351813.2020.1739422}, pages = {247 -- 270}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This article explores a sequence organizational phenomenon that results from the use of a loosely specifiable turn format (viz., That's + wh-clause) for launching (next) sequences while at the same time connecting back to a prior turn. Using this practice creates a sequential juncture, i.e., a pivot-like nexus between one sequence and a next. In third position, such junctures serve to accomplish seamless sequential transitions from one sequence into a next by presenting the latter as locally occasioned. The practice may, however, also be deployed in second position to launch actions that have not been made relevant or provided for by the preceding action and exhibit response relevance themselves. The sequential junctures then become retro-sequential in character: They transform the projected trajectory of the sequence in progress and create interlocking sequential structures. These findings highlight that sequence is practice, while pointing to understudied interconnections between tying and sequentiality. Data are in English.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Kuettner2016, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {That-initial turns in English conversation}, pages = {vii, 345}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{Kuettner2014, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure?}, series = {Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion = Prosody and phonetics in interaction}, journal = {Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion = Prosody and phonetics in interaction}, publisher = {Verlag f{\"u}r Gespr{\"a}chsforschung}, address = {Mannheim}, isbn = {978-3-936656-60-2}, pages = {46 -- 69}, year = {2014}, abstract = {This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Kuettner2014, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {Opening Up CA - An Interactional Linguist's View on ICCA-14}, series = {Gespr{\"a}chsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion}, journal = {Gespr{\"a}chsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion}, number = {15}, publisher = {Verlag f{\"u}r Gespr{\"a}chsforschung}, address = {Mannheim}, issn = {1617-1837}, pages = {264 -- 289}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{Kuettner2018, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {Investigating Inferences in Sequences of Action}, series = {Open Linguistics}, volume = {4}, journal = {Open Linguistics}, number = {1}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2300-9969}, doi = {10.1515/opli-2018-0006}, pages = {101 -- 126}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that's right to implicitly claim "just-now" recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant's production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants' understanding of oh that's right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semanticpragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective.}, language = {en} } @misc{Kuettner2018, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {Investigating inferences in sequences of action}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam: Philosophische Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam: Philosophische Reihe}, number = {161}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42631}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426310}, pages = {26}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that's right to implicitly claim "just-now" recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant's production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants' understanding of oh that's right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semantic-pragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective.}, language = {en} } @article{Kuettner2019, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {At the intersection of stance-management and repair}, series = {Gespr{\"a}chsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion}, journal = {Gespr{\"a}chsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion}, number = {20}, publisher = {Verlag f{\"u}r Gespr{\"a}chsforschung}, address = {Gleizendorf bei N{\"u}rnberg}, issn = {1617-1837}, pages = {115 -- 156}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Dieser Beitrag widmet sich der Verwendung eines spezifischen Typs meta-sprachlicher {\"A}ußerungen. Er untersucht wie SprecherInnen des Englischen meta-pragmatische Behauptungen, zuvor das „Gleiche" kommuniziert (‚gesagt' oder ‚gemeint') zu haben wie ihr Gespr{\"a}chspartner, verwenden. Mit Hilfe detaillierter sequenzieller Analysen wird gezeigt, dass diese Behauptungen oft verwendet werden, um disaffiliative Erwiderungen zu entkr{\"a}ften und somit aufkeimende Meinungsverschiedenheiten aufzul{\"o}sen. Neben der Beschreibung der Mechanismen, die dieser Praktik zu Grunde liegen, werden die verschiedenen verbalen, para- und non-verbalen Ressourcen, die bei der Verwendung dieser Praktik (teils variabel) zum Einsatz ge-bracht werden, inventarisiert. Abschließend wird das Verh{\"a}ltnis dieser Praktik zu anderen Gespr{\"a}chspraktiken diskutiert. Da sie grundlegend darauf fußt, dass ein Missverst{\"a}ndnis auf Seiten des Gegen{\"u}bers insinuiert wird, kann sie an der Schnittstelle von Praktiken zum Management von Einstellungen bzw. Haltungen und Reparaturen verortet werden.}, language = {en} } @misc{Kuettner2019, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {At the intersection of stance-management and repair}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe}, issn = {1866-8380}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-44348}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-443485}, pages = {115 -- 156}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker's insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English.}, language = {en} } @misc{Kuettner2014, author = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander}, title = {Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure?}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe}, number = {172}, issn = {1866-8380}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-44536}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-445363}, pages = {26}, year = {2014}, abstract = {This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL.}, language = {en} }