@misc{FischerShaki2018,
  author    = {Fischer, Martin H. and Shaki, Samuel},
  title     = {Number concepts: abstract and embodied},
  series = {Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London : B, Biological sciences},
  volume    = {373},
  journal   = {Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London : B, Biological sciences},
  number    = {1752},
  publisher = {Royal Society},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0962-8436},
  doi       = {10.1098/rstb.2017.0125},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Numerical knowledge, including number concepts and arithmetic procedures, seems to be a clear-cut case for abstract symbol manipulation. Yet, evidence from perceptual and motor behaviour reveals that natural number knowledge and simple arithmetic also remain closely associated with modal experiences. Following a review of behavioural, animal and neuroscience studies of number processing, we propose a revised understanding of psychological number concepts as grounded in physical constraints, embodied in experience and situated through task-specific intentions. The idea that number concepts occupy a range of positions on the continuum between abstract and modal conceptual knowledge also accounts for systematic heuristics and biases in mental arithmetic, thus inviting psycho-logical approaches to the study of the mathematical mind.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FischerShaki2018,
  author    = {Fischer, Martin H. and Shaki, Samuel},
  title     = {Repeating Numbers Reduces Results: Violations of the Identity Axiom in Mental Arithmetic},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02453},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Even simple mental arithmetic is fraught with cognitive biases. For example, adding repeated numbers (so-called tie problems, e.g., 2 + 2) not only has a speed and accuracy advantage over adding different numbers (e.g., 1 + 3) but may also lead to under-representation of the result relative to a standard value (Charras et al., 2012, 2014). Does the tie advantage merely reflect easier encoding or retrieval compared to non-ties, or also a distorted result representation? To answer this question, 47 healthy adults performed two tasks, both of which indicated under-representation of tie results: In a result-to-position pointing task (Experiment 1) we measured the spatial mapping of numbers and found a left-bias for tie compared to non-tie problems. In a result-to-line-length production task (Experiment 2) we measured the underlying magnitude representation directly and obtained shorter lines for tie-compared to non-tie problems. These observations suggest that the processing benefit of tie problems comes at the cost of representational reduction of result meaning. This conclusion is discussed in the context of a recent model of arithmetic heuristics and biases.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Fischer2018,
  author    = {Fischer, Martin H.},
  title     = {Why Numbers Are Embodied Concepts},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02347},
  pages     = {1 -- 3},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Fischer2018,
  author    = {Fischer, Martin H.},
  title     = {Why Numbers Are Embodied Concepts},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {440},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412097},
  pages     = {3},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FischerMiklashevskyShaki2018,
  author    = {Fischer, Martin H. and Miklashevsky, Alex A. and Shaki, Samuel},
  title     = {Commentary : The Developmental Trajectory of the Operational Momentum Effect},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02259},
  pages     = {3},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Sixtus2018,
  author    = {Sixtus, Elena},
  title     = {Subtle fingers - tangible numbers: The influence of finger counting experience on mental number representations},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420115},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {vi, 138},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Numbers are omnipresent in daily life. They vary in display format and in their meaning so that it does not seem self-evident that our brains process them more or less easily and flexibly. The present thesis addresses mental number representations in general, and specifically the impact of finger counting on mental number representations. Finger postures that result from finger counting experience are one of many ways to convey numerical information. They are, however, probably the one where the numerical content becomes most tangible. By investigating the role of fingers in adults' mental number representations the four presented studies also tested the Embodied Cognition hypothesis which predicts that bodily experience (e.g., finger counting) during concept acquisition (e.g., number concepts) stays an immanent part of these concepts. The studies focussed on different aspects of finger counting experience. First, consistency and further details of spontaneously used finger configurations were investigated when participants repeatedly produced finger postures according to specific numbers (Study 1). Furthermore, finger counting postures (Study 2), different finger configurations (Study 2 and 4), finger movements (Study 3), and tactile finger perception (Study 4) were investigated regarding their capability to affect number processing. Results indicated that active production of finger counting postures and single finger movements as well as passive perception of tactile stimulation of specific fingers co-activated associated number knowledge and facilitated responses towards corresponding magnitudes and number symbols. Overall, finger counting experience was reflected in specific effects in mental number processing of adult participants. This indicates that finger counting experience is an immanent part of mental number representations. Findings are discussed in the light of a novel model. The MASC (Model of Analogue and Symbolic Codes) combines and extends two established models of number and magnitude processing. Especially a symbolic motor code is introduced as an essential part of the model. It comprises canonical finger postures (i.e., postures that are habitually used to represent numbers) and finger-number associations. The present findings indicate that finger counting functions both as a sensorimotor magnitude and as a symbolic representational format and that it thereby directly mediates between physical and symbolic size. The implications are relevant both for basic research regarding mental number representations and for pedagogic practices regarding the effectiveness of finger counting as a means to acquire a fundamental grasp of numbers.},
  language  = {en}
}