@misc{AppiahDwomohMuellerMayer2018,
  author    = {Appiah-Dwomoh, Edem Korkor and M{\"u}ller, Steffen and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Reproducibility of Static and Dynamic Postural Control Measurement in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {470},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-417526},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Static (one-legged stance) and dynamic (star excursion balance) postural control tests were performed by 14 adolescent athletes with and 17 without back pain to determine reproducibility. The total displacement, mediolateral and anterior-posterior displacements of the centre of pressure in mm for the static, and the normalized and composite reach distances for the dynamic tests were analysed. Intraclass correlation coefficients, 95\% confidence intervals, and a Bland-Altman analysis were calculated for reproducibility. Intraclass correlation coefficients for subjects with (0.54 to 0.65), (0.61 to 0.69) and without (0.45 to 0.49), (0.52 to 0.60) back pain were obtained on the static test for right and left legs, respectively. Likewise, (0.79 to 0.88), (0.75 to 0.93) for subjects with and (0.61 to 0.82), (0.60 to 0.85) for those without back pain were obtained on the dynamic test for the right and left legs, respectively. Systematic bias was not observed between test and retest of subjects on both static and dynamic tests. The one-legged stance and star excursion balance tests have fair to excellent reliabilities on measures of postural control in adolescent athletes with and without back pain. They can be used as measures of postural control in adolescent athletes with and without back pain.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AppiahDwomohMuellerMayer2018,
  author    = {Appiah-Dwomoh, Edem Korkor and M{\"u}ller, Steffen and Mayer, Frank},
  title     = {Reproducibility of Static and Dynamic Postural Control Measurement in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain},
  series = {Rehabilitation Research and Practice},
  volume    = {2018},
  journal   = {Rehabilitation Research and Practice},
  publisher = {Hindawi},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {2090-2875},
  doi       = {10.1155/2018/8438350},
  pages     = {1 -- 8},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Static (one-legged stance) and dynamic (star excursion balance) postural control tests were performed by 14 adolescent athletes with and 17 without back pain to determine reproducibility. The total displacement, mediolateral and anterior-posterior displacements of the centre of pressure in mm for the static, and the normalized and composite reach distances for the dynamic tests were analysed. Intraclass correlation coefficients, 95\% confidence intervals, and a Bland-Altman analysis were calculated for reproducibility. Intraclass correlation coefficients for subjects with (0.54 to 0.65), (0.61 to 0.69) and without (0.45 to 0.49), (0.52 to 0.60) back pain were obtained on the static test for right and left legs, respectively. Likewise, (0.79 to 0.88), (0.75 to 0.93) for subjects with and (0.61 to 0.82), (0.60 to 0.85) for those without back pain were obtained on the dynamic test for the right and left legs, respectively. Systematic bias was not observed between test and retest of subjects on both static and dynamic tests. The one-legged stance and star excursion balance tests have fair to excellent reliabilities on measures of postural control in adolescent athletes with and without back pain. They can be used as measures of postural control in adolescent athletes with and without back pain.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GaertnerBrunner2018,
  author    = {G{\"a}rtner, Holger and Brunner, Martin},
  title     = {Once good teaching, always good teaching?},
  series = {Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1874-8597},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11092-018-9277-5},
  pages     = {159 -- 182},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In many countries, students are asked about their perceptions of teaching in order to make decisions about the further development of teaching practices on the basis of this feedback. The stability of this measurement of teaching quality is a prerequisite for the ability to generalize the results to other teaching situations. The present study aims to expand the extant empirical body of knowledge on the effects of situational factors on the stability of students' perceptions of teaching quality. Therefore, we investigate whether the degree of stability is moderated by three situational factors: time between assessments, subjects taught by teachers, and students' grade levels. To this end, we analyzed data from a web-based student feedback system. The study involved 497 teachers, each of whom conducted two student surveys. We examined the differential stability of student perceptions of 16 teaching constructs that were operationalized as latent correlations between aggregated student perceptions of the same teacher's teaching. Testing metric invariance indicated that student ratings provided measures of teaching constructs that were invariant across time, subjects, and grade levels. Stability was moderated to some extent by grade level but not by subjects taught nor time spacing between surveys. The results provide evidence of the extent to which situational factors may affect the stability of student perceptions of teaching constructs. The generalizability of the students' feedback results to other teaching situations is discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}