@phdthesis{Thiele2023, author = {Thiele, Dirk}, title = {Krafttraining im Nachwuchsleistungsrudern}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58420}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {xiii, 146}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Krafttraining ist ein etabliertes Mittel f{\"u}r die Entwicklung k{\"o}rperlicher Fitness und sport-artspezifischer Leistungen in verschiedenen Sportarten. Dabei scheint dem Krafttraining auch im Hinblick auf den langfristigen Leistungsaufbau im Nachwuchsleistungssport Rudern eine besondere Rolle zuzukommen. Die vorliegende Arbeit widmet sich der Optimie-rung der Leistungsdiagnostik sowie der Bewertung der Effektivit{\"a}t von Krafttrainingsmethoden zur Verbesserung der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness und der sportartspezifischen Leistung im Nachwuchsleistungsrudern. Die erste Studie im Rahmen dieser kumulativen Arbeit beinhaltet die Analyse eines sport-artspezifischen Anforderungsprofils der Sportart Rudern. Die Studienergebnisse zeigen, dass die Energiebereitstellung im Ruderwettkampf zu einem großen Anteil aus aeroben und zu einem geringen Anteil aus anaeroben Stoffwechselprozessen erfolgt. W{\"a}hrend der vier Phasen des rudertechnischen Leitbildes werden nahezu alle großen Muskelgruppen beansprucht. Aufgrund der hohen Trainingsumf{\"a}nge auf internationalem Leistungsniveau besteht bei Ruderern ein erh{\"o}htes Risiko, Verletzungen im lumbalen R{\"u}ckensegment, den Knien sowie den Rippen zu erleiden. Im Rahmen der zweiten Studie wurden die Effekte von Krafttraining auf die k{\"o}rperliche Fitness und die sportartspezifische Leistung von Ruderern unterschiedlichen Expertisen-niveaus untersucht. Die Studienergebnisse zeigen, dass signifikante kleine Effekte des Krafttrainings auf die k{\"o}rperliche Fitness (Maximalkraft der unteren Gliedmaßen) und auf die sportartspezifische Leistung existieren. Subgruppenanalysen f{\"u}r Krafttrainingstyp und Expertisenniveau zeigten nicht signifikante Unterschiede zwischen den jeweiligen Subgruppen der Ruderer. Die dritte Studie analysierte die Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen der biologischen Reife, der K{\"o}rperkonstitution und der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness mit der Leistung auf dem Ruderergometer {\"u}ber 700-m bei weiblichen Nachwuchseliteruderern. Die Analyse zeigte signifikante mittle-re bis hohe Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen der biologischen Reife, Kennwerten der K{\"o}rperkonstitution, der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness (z. B. Maximalkraft, Kraftausdauer) und der Leistung auf dem Ruderergometer. Zus{\"a}tzlich konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Pr{\"a}diktoren K{\"o}rperkonstitution (Magermasse) und Kraftausdauer (Bourban-Test) die Leistung des 700-m Ruderergometertest am besten abbilden. Die vierte Studie untersuchte die Effekte von zwei unterschiedlichen Krafttrainingsmetho-den, die jeweils {\"u}ber neun Wochen durchgef{\"u}hrt wurden, auf die k{\"o}rperliche Fitness und die Leistung auf dem Ruderergometer bei weiblichen Elite-Nachwuchsruderern. Die Stu-dienergebnisse zeigen, dass beide Gruppen signifikante Steigerungen auf ausgew{\"a}hlte Komponenten der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness (z. B. Maximalkraft, Schnellkraft, anaerobe Aus-dauer und Richtungswechselgeschwindigkeit) und die sportartspezifische Leistung erzielten. Signifikant gr{\"o}ßere Zuw{\"a}chse resultierten nach Krafttraining mit h{\"o}heren Intensit{\"a}ten [HI] bei gleichem Volumen im Vergleich zu Kraftausdauertraining [KA] in ausgew{\"a}hlten Komponenten der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness (z. B. Maximalkraft). Im Gegensatz dazu, f{\"u}hrte KA bei gleichem Volumen im Vergleich zu HI zu gr{\"o}ßeren Steigerungen der sportartspezifischen Leistung. Zusammenfassend zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Krafttraining ein effektives Mittel zur Steigerung ausgew{\"a}hlter Komponenten der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness und der sportartspezifischen Leistung in der Sportart Rudern f{\"u}r RuderInnen und im Speziellen f{\"u}r den Nachwuchssport ist. Insbesondere im Nachwuchsleistungsrudern zeigte sich, dass HI zus{\"a}tzlich zum regul{\"a}ren Rudertraining effektiver zur Verbesserung der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness (z. B. Maximalkraft) ist als KA. Zur Verbesserung der sportartspezifischen Leistung jedoch, stellte KA im Vergleich zu HI bei weiblichen Elite-Nachwuchsruderern die effektivere Krafttrainings-methode dar. Weiterhin wird Trainern im Nachwuchsrudersport empfohlen, ausgew{\"a}hlte Merkmale der biologischen Reife, K{\"o}rperkonstitution sowie der k{\"o}rperlichen Fitness (Maximalkraft, Kraftausdauer) f{\"u}r die Talententwicklung zu ber{\"u}cksichtigen.}, language = {de} } @article{ThielePrieskeChaabeneetal.2020, author = {Thiele, Dirk and Prieske, Olaf and Chaabene, Helmi and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects of strength training on physical fitness and sport-specific performance in recreational, sub-elite, and elite rowers}, series = {Journal of sports sciences}, volume = {38}, journal = {Journal of sports sciences}, number = {10}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0264-0414}, doi = {10.1080/02640414.2020.1745502}, pages = {1186 -- 1195}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to examine the effects of strength training (ST) on selected components of physical fitness (e.g., lower/upper limb maximal strength, muscular endurance, jump performance, cardiorespiratory endurance) and sport-specific performance in rowers. Only studies with an active control group were included if they examined the effects of ST on at least one proxy of physical fitness and/or sport-specific performance in rowers. Weighted and averaged standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were computed to identify effects of ST type or expertise level on sport-specific performance. Our analyses revealed significant small effects of ST on lower limb maximal strength (SMD = 0.42, p = 0.05) and on sport-specific performance (SMD = 0.32, p = 0.05). Non-significant effects were found for upper limb maximal strength, upper/lower limb muscular endurance, jump performance, and cardiorespiratory endurance. Subgroup analyses for ST type and expertise level showed non-significant differences between the respective subgroups of rowers (p >= 0.32). Our systematic review with meta-analysis indicated that ST is an effective means for improving lower limb maximal strength and sport-specific performance in rowers. However, ST-induced effects are neither modulated by ST type nor rowers' expertise level.}, language = {en} } @misc{ThielePrieskeLesinskietal.2020, author = {Thiele, Dirk and Prieske, Olaf and Lesinski, Melanie and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects of Equal Volume Heavy-Resistance Strength Training Versus Strength Endurance Training on Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Elite Female Rowers}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {664}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-48196}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-481961}, pages = {14}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Strength training is an important means for performance development in young rowers. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 9-week equal volume heavy-resistance strength training (HRST) versus strength endurance training (SET) in addition to regular rowing training on primary (e.g., maximal strength/power) and secondary outcomes (e.g., balance) in young rowers. Twenty-six female elite adolescent rowers were assigned to an HRST (n = 12; age: 13.2 ± 0.5 yrs; maturity-offset: +2.0 ± 0.5 yrs) or a SET group (n = 14; age: 13.1 ± 0.5 yrs; maturity-offset: +2.1 ± 0.5 yrs). HRST and SET comprised lower- (i.e., leg press/knee flexion/extension), upper-limbs (i.e., bench press/pull; lat-pull down), and complex exercises (i.e., rowing ergometer). HRST performed four sets with 12 repetitions per set at an intensity of 75-95\% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM). SET conducted four sets with 30 repetitions per set at 50-60\% of the 1-RM. Training volume was matched for overall repetitions × intensity × training per week. Pre-post training, tests were performed for the assessment of primary [i.e., maximal strength (e.g., bench pull/knee flexion/extension 1-RM/isometric handgrip test), muscle power (e.g., medicine-ball push test, triple hop, drop jump, and countermovement jump), anaerobic endurance (400-m run), sport-specific performance (700-m rowing ergometer trial)] and secondary outcomes [dynamic balance (Y-balance test), change-of-direction (CoD) speed (multistage shuttle-run test)]. Adherence rate was >87\% and one athlete of each group dropped out. Overall, 24 athletes completed the study and no test or training-related injuries occurred. Significant group × time interactions were observed for maximal strength, muscle power, anaerobic endurance, CoD speed, and sport-specific performance (p ≤ 0.05; 0.45 ≤ d ≤ 1.11). Post hoc analyses indicated larger gains in maximal strength and muscle power following HRST (p ≤ 0.05; 1.81 ≤ d ≤ 3.58) compared with SET (p ≤ 0.05; 1.04 ≤ d ≤ 2.30). Furthermore, SET (p ≤ 0.01; d = 2.08) resulted in larger gains in sport-specific performance compared with HRST (p < 0.05; d = 1.3). Only HRST produced significant pre-post improvements for anaerobic endurance and CoD speed (p ≤ 0.05; 1.84 ≤ d ≤ 4.76). In conclusion, HRST in addition to regular rowing training was more effective than SET to improve selected measures of physical fitness (i.e., maximal strength, muscle power, anaerobic endurance, and CoD speed) and SET was more effective than HRST to enhance sport-specific performance gains in female elite young rowers.}, language = {en} } @article{ThielePrieskeLesinskietal.2020, author = {Thiele, Dirk and Prieske, Olaf and Lesinski, Melanie and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects of Equal Volume Heavy-Resistance Strength Training Versus Strength Endurance Training on Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Elite Female Rowers}, series = {Frontiers in Physiology}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Physiology}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-042X}, doi = {10.3389/fphys.2020.00888}, pages = {12}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Strength training is an important means for performance development in young rowers. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 9-week equal volume heavy-resistance strength training (HRST) versus strength endurance training (SET) in addition to regular rowing training on primary (e.g., maximal strength/power) and secondary outcomes (e.g., balance) in young rowers. Twenty-six female elite adolescent rowers were assigned to an HRST (n = 12; age: 13.2 ± 0.5 yrs; maturity-offset: +2.0 ± 0.5 yrs) or a SET group (n = 14; age: 13.1 ± 0.5 yrs; maturity-offset: +2.1 ± 0.5 yrs). HRST and SET comprised lower- (i.e., leg press/knee flexion/extension), upper-limbs (i.e., bench press/pull; lat-pull down), and complex exercises (i.e., rowing ergometer). HRST performed four sets with 12 repetitions per set at an intensity of 75-95\% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM). SET conducted four sets with 30 repetitions per set at 50-60\% of the 1-RM. Training volume was matched for overall repetitions × intensity × training per week. Pre-post training, tests were performed for the assessment of primary [i.e., maximal strength (e.g., bench pull/knee flexion/extension 1-RM/isometric handgrip test), muscle power (e.g., medicine-ball push test, triple hop, drop jump, and countermovement jump), anaerobic endurance (400-m run), sport-specific performance (700-m rowing ergometer trial)] and secondary outcomes [dynamic balance (Y-balance test), change-of-direction (CoD) speed (multistage shuttle-run test)]. Adherence rate was >87\% and one athlete of each group dropped out. Overall, 24 athletes completed the study and no test or training-related injuries occurred. Significant group × time interactions were observed for maximal strength, muscle power, anaerobic endurance, CoD speed, and sport-specific performance (p ≤ 0.05; 0.45 ≤ d ≤ 1.11). Post hoc analyses indicated larger gains in maximal strength and muscle power following HRST (p ≤ 0.05; 1.81 ≤ d ≤ 3.58) compared with SET (p ≤ 0.05; 1.04 ≤ d ≤ 2.30). Furthermore, SET (p ≤ 0.01; d = 2.08) resulted in larger gains in sport-specific performance compared with HRST (p < 0.05; d = 1.3). Only HRST produced significant pre-post improvements for anaerobic endurance and CoD speed (p ≤ 0.05; 1.84 ≤ d ≤ 4.76). In conclusion, HRST in addition to regular rowing training was more effective than SET to improve selected measures of physical fitness (i.e., maximal strength, muscle power, anaerobic endurance, and CoD speed) and SET was more effective than HRST to enhance sport-specific performance gains in female elite young rowers.}, language = {en} }