@article{VormoorHeistermannBronstertetal.2018, author = {Vormoor, Klaus Josef and Heistermann, Maik and Bronstert, Axel and Lawrence, Deborah}, title = {Hydrological model parameter (in)stability}, series = {Hydrological sciences journal = Journal des sciences hydrologiques}, volume = {63}, journal = {Hydrological sciences journal = Journal des sciences hydrologiques}, number = {7}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0262-6667}, doi = {10.1080/02626667.2018.1466056}, pages = {991 -- 1007}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper investigates the transferability of calibrated HBV model parameters under stable and contrasting conditions in terms of flood seasonality and flood generating processes (FGP) in five Norwegian catchments with mixed snowmelt/rainfall regimes. We apply a series of generalized (differential) split-sample tests using a 6-year moving window over (i) the entire runoff observation periods, and (ii) two subsets of runoff observations distinguished by the seasonal occurrence of annual maximum floods during either spring or autumn. The results indicate a general model performance loss due to the transfer of calibrated parameters to independent validation periods of -5 to -17\%, on average. However, there is no indication that contrasting flood seasonality exacerbates performance losses, which contradicts the assumption that optimized parameter sets for snowmelt-dominated floods (during spring) perform particularly poorly on validation periods with rainfall-dominated floods (during autumn) and vice versa.}, language = {en} } @misc{VormoorHeistermannBronstertetal.2018, author = {Vormoor, Klaus Josef and Heistermann, Maik and Bronstert, Axel and Lawrence, Deborah}, title = {Hydrological model parameter (in)stability}, series = {Hydrological Sciences Journal}, journal = {Hydrological Sciences Journal}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-413008}, pages = {18}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This paper investigates the transferability of calibrated HBV model parameters under stable and contrasting conditions in terms of flood seasonality and flood generating processes (FGP) in five Norwegian catchments with mixed snowmelt/rainfall regimes. We apply a series of generalized (differential) split-sample tests using a 6-year moving window over (i) the entire runoff observation periods, and (ii) two subsets of runoff observations distinguished by the seasonal occurrence of annual maximum floods during either spring or autumn. The results indicate a general model performance loss due to the transfer of calibrated parameters to independent validation periods of -5 to -17\%, on average. However, there is no indication that contrasting flood seasonality exacerbates performance losses, which contradicts the assumption that optimized parameter sets for snowmelt-dominated floods (during spring) perform particularly poorly on validation periods with rainfall-dominated floods (during autumn) and vice versa.}, language = {en} } @article{UberVandervaereZinetal.2018, author = {Uber, Magdalena and Vandervaere, Jean-Pierre and Zin, Isabella and Braud, Isabelle and Heistermann, Maik and Legout, Cedric and Molinie, Gilles and Nord, Guillaume}, title = {How does initial soil moisture influence the hydrological response? A case study from southern France}, series = {Hydrology and earth system sciences : HESS}, volume = {22}, journal = {Hydrology and earth system sciences : HESS}, number = {12}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1027-5606}, doi = {10.5194/hess-22-6127-2018}, pages = {6127 -- 6146}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The phi(ev) is calculated from high-resolution discharge and precipitation data for several rain events with a cumulative precipitation P-cum ranging from less than 5mm to more than 80 mm. Because of the high uncertainty of phi(ev) associated with the hydrograph separation method, phi(ev) is calculated with several methods, including graphical methods, digital filters and a tracer-based method. The results indicate that the hydrological response depends on (theta) over bar (ini): during dry conditions phi(ev) is consistently below 0.1, even for events with high and intense precipitation. Above a threshold of (theta) over bar (ini) = 34 vol \% phi(ev) can reach values up to 0.99 but there is a high scatter. Some variability can be explained with a weak correlation of phi(ev) with P-cum and rain intensity, but a considerable part of the variability remains unexplained. It is concluded that threshold-based methods can be helpful to prevent overestimation of the hydrological response during dry catchment conditions. The impact of soil moisture on the hydrological response during wet catchment conditions, however, is still insufficiently understood and cannot be generalized based on the present results.}, language = {en} } @article{BronstertAgarwalBoessenkooletal.2018, author = {Bronstert, Axel and Agarwal, Ankit and Boessenkool, Berry and Crisologo, Irene and Fischer, Madlen and Heistermann, Maik and Koehn-Reich, Lisei and Andres Lopez-Tarazon, Jose and Moran, Thomas and Ozturk, Ugur and Reinhardt-Imjela, Christian and Wendi, Dadiyorto}, title = {Forensic hydro-meteorological analysis of an extreme flash flood}, series = {The science of the total environment : an international journal for scientific research into the environment and its relationship with man}, volume = {630}, journal = {The science of the total environment : an international journal for scientific research into the environment and its relationship with man}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0048-9697}, doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.241}, pages = {977 -- 991}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The flash-flood in Braunsbach in the north-eastern part of Baden-Wuerttemberg/Germany was a particularly strong and concise event which took place during the floods in southern Germany at the end of May/early June 2016. This article presents a detailed analysis of the hydro-meteorological forcing and the hydrological consequences of this event. A specific approach, the "forensic hydrological analysis" was followed in order to include and combine retrospectively a variety of data from different disciplines. Such an approach investigates the origins, mechanisms and course of such natural events if possible in a "near real time" mode, in order to follow the most recent traces of the event. The results show that it was a very rare rainfall event with extreme intensities which, in combination with catchment properties, led to extreme runoff plus severe geomorphological hazards, i.e. great debris flows, which together resulted in immense damage in this small rural town Braunsbach. It was definitely a record-breaking event and greatly exceeded existing design guidelines for extreme flood discharge for this region, i.e. by a factor of about 10. Being such a rare or even unique event, it is not reliably feasible to put it into a crisp probabilistic context. However, one can conclude that a return period clearly above 100 years can be assigned for all event components: rainfall, peak discharge and sediment transport. Due to the complex and interacting processes, no single flood cause or reason for the very high damage can be identified, since only the interplay and the cascading characteristics of those led to such an event. The roles of different human activities on the origin and/or intensification of such an extreme event are finally discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @misc{CrisologoWarrenMuehlbaueretal.2018, author = {Crisologo, Irene and Warren, Robert A. and M{\"u}hlbauer, Kai and Heistermann, Maik}, title = {Enhancing the consistency of spaceborne and ground-based radar comparisons by using beam blockage fraction as a quality filter}, series = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques}, journal = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-418198}, pages = {14}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We explore the potential of spaceborne radar (SR) observations from the Ku-band precipitation radars onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellites as a reference to quantify the ground radar (GR) reflectivity bias. To this end, the 3-D volume-matching algorithm proposed by Schwaller and Morris (2011) is implemented and applied to 5 years (2012-2016) of observations. We further extend the procedure by a framework to take into account the data quality of each ground radar bin. Through these methods, we are able to assign a quality index to each matching SR-GR volume, and thus compute the GR calibration bias as a quality-weighted average of reflectivity differences in any sample of matching GR-SR volumes. We exemplify the idea of quality-weighted averaging by using the beam blockage fraction as the basis of a quality index. As a result, we can increase the consistency of SR and GR observations, and thus the precision of calibration bias estimates. The remaining scatter between GR and SR reflectivity as well as the variability of bias estimates between overpass events indicate, however, that other error sources are not yet fully addressed. Still, our study provides a framework to introduce any other quality variables that are considered relevant in a specific context. The code that implements our analysis is based on the wradlib open-source software library, and is, together with the data, publicly available to monitor radar calibration or to scrutinize long series of archived radar data back to December 1997, when TRMM became operational.}, language = {en} } @article{CrisologoWarrenMuehlbaueretal.2018, author = {Crisologo, Irene and Warren, Robert A. and M{\"u}hlbauer, Kai and Heistermann, Maik}, title = {Enhancing the consistency of spaceborne and ground-based radar comparisons by using beam blockage fraction as a quality filter}, series = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques}, volume = {11}, journal = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques}, number = {9}, publisher = {Copernicus Publ.}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1867-1381}, doi = {10.5194/amt-2018-101}, pages = {5223 -- 5236}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We explore the potential of spaceborne radar (SR) observations from the Ku-band precipitation radars onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellites as a reference to quantify the ground radar (GR) reflectivity bias. To this end, the 3-D volume-matching algorithm proposed by Schwaller and Morris (2011) is implemented and applied to 5 years (2012-2016) of observations. We further extend the procedure by a framework to take into account the data quality of each ground radar bin. Through these methods, we are able to assign a quality index to each matching SR-GR volume, and thus compute the GR calibration bias as a quality-weighted average of reflectivity differences in any sample of matching GR-SR volumes. We exemplify the idea of quality-weighted averaging by using the beam blockage fraction as the basis of a quality index. As a result, we can increase the consistency of SR and GR observations, and thus the precision of calibration bias estimates. The remaining scatter between GR and SR reflectivity as well as the variability of bias estimates between overpass events indicate, however, that other error sources are not yet fully addressed. Still, our study provides a framework to introduce any other quality variables that are considered relevant in a specific context. The code that implements our analysis is based on the wradlib open-source software library, and is, together with the data, publicly available to monitor radar calibration or to scrutinize long series of archived radar data back to December 1997, when TRMM became operational.}, language = {en} }