@book{BaurMutzNobisetal.2008,
  author    = {Baur, J{\"u}rgen and Mutz, Michael and Nobis, Tina and R{\"u}bner, Anne and Strahle, Yvonne},
  title     = {Basisdaten zum Programm "Integration durch Sport"},
  series = {Ass-Materialien},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Ass-Materialien},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1615-6129},
  pages     = {38 S.},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HoltmannMutzBuchheisteretal.2008,
  author    = {Holtmann, Dieter and Mutz, Michael and Buchheister, Claudia and G{\"o}rl, Tilo},
  title     = {Die Sozialstruktur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-940793-25-6},
  pages     = {298 S.},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HoltmannMutzBuchheisteretal.2008,
  author    = {Holtmann, Dieter and Mutz, Michael and Buchheister, Claudia and G{\"o}rl, Tilo},
  title     = {Die Sozialstruktur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich},
  publisher = {Univ.-Verl. Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-940793-56-0},
  pages     = {298 S.},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HoltmannMutzBuchheisteretal.2007,
  author    = {Holtmann, Dieter and Mutz, Michael and Buchheister, Claudia and G{\"o}rl, Tilo},
  title     = {Die Sozialstruktur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-62-9},
  pages     = {287 S.},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HoltmannMutzBuchheisteretal.2007,
  author    = {Holtmann, Dieter and Mutz, Michael and Buchheister, Claudia and G{\"o}rl, Tilo},
  title     = {Die Sozialstruktur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-86-5},
  pages     = {288 S.},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GoerlBuchheisterMutzetal.2007,
  author    = {G{\"o}rl, Tilo and Buchheister, Claudia and Mutz, Michael and Buchheister, Claudia and G{\"o}rl, Tilo},
  title     = {Die Sozialstrukturanalyse der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich},
  editor    = {Holtmann, Dieter},
  publisher = {Univ.-Verl.},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-86-5},
  pages     = {288 S.},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{FabianZlatanovićMutzetal.2018,
  author    = {Fabian, Jenny and Zlatanović, Sanja and Mutz, Michael and Grossart, Hans-Peter and Geldern, Robert van and Ulrich, Andreas and Gleixner, Gerd and Premke, Katrin},
  title     = {Environmental control on microbial turnover of leaf carbon in streams},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {693},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42633},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426336},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In aquatic ecosystems, light availability can significantly influence microbial turnover of terrestrial organic matter through associated metabolic interactions between phototrophic and heterotrophic communities. However, particularly in streams, microbial functions vary significantly with the structure of the streambed, that is the distribution and spatial arrangement of sediment grains in the streambed. It is therefore essential to elucidate how environmental factors synergistically define the microbial turnover of terrestrial organic matter in order to better understand the ecological role of photo-heterotrophic interactions in stream ecosystem processes. In outdoor experimental streams, we examined how the structure of streambeds modifies the influence of light availability on microbial turnover of leaf carbon (C). Furthermore, we investigated whether the studied relationships of microbial leaf C turnover to environmental conditions are affected by flow intermittency commonly occurring in streams. We applied leaves enriched with a 13C-stable isotope tracer and combined quantitative and isotope analyses. We thereby elucidated whether treatment induced changes in C turnover were associated with altered use of leaf C within the microbial food web. Moreover, isotope analyses were combined with measurements of microbial community composition to determine whether changes in community function were associated with a change in community composition. In this study, we present evidence, that environmental factors interactively determine how phototrophs and heterotrophs contribute to leaf C turnover. Light availability promoted the utilization of leaf C within the microbial food web, which was likely associated with a promoted availability of highly bioavailable metabolites of phototrophic origin. However, our results additionally confirm that the structure of the streambed modifies light-related changes in microbial C turnover. From our observations, we conclude that the streambed structure influences the strength of photo-heterotrophic interactions by defining the spatial availability of algal metabolites in the streambed and the composition of microbial communities. Collectively, our multifactorial approach provides valuable insights into environmental controls on the functioning of stream ecosystems.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FabianZlatanovicMutzetal.2018,
  author    = {Fabian, Jenny and Zlatanovic, Sanja and Mutz, Michael and Grossart, Hans-Peter and van Geldern, Robert and Ulrich, Andreas and Gleixner, Gerd and Premke, Katrin},
  title     = {Environmental control on microbial turnover of leaf carbon in streams},
  series = {Frontiers in microbiology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in microbiology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-302X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fmicb.2018.01044},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In aquatic ecosystems, light availability can significantly influence microbial turnover of terrestrial organic matter through associated metabolic interactions between phototrophic and heterotrophic communities. However, particularly in streams, microbial functions vary significantly with the structure of the streambed, that is the distribution and spatial arrangement of sediment grains in the streambed. It is therefore essential to elucidate how environmental factors synergistically define the microbial turnover of terrestrial organic matter in order to better understand the ecological role of photoheterotrophic interactions in stream ecosystem processes. In outdoor experimental streams, we examined how the structure of streambeds modifies the influence of light availability on microbial turnover of leaf carbon (C). Furthermore, we investigated whether the studied relationships of microbial leaf C turnover to environmental conditions are affected by flow intermittency commonly occurring in streams. We applied leaves enriched with a C-13-stable isotope tracer and combined quantitative and isotope analyses. We thereby elucidated whether treatment induced changes in C turnover were associated with altered use of leaf C within the microbial food web. Moreover, isotope analyses were combined with measurements of microbial community composition to determine whether changes in community function were associated with a change in community composition. In this study, we present evidence, that environmental factors interactively determine how phototrophs and heterotrophs contribute to leaf C turnover. Light availability promoted the utilization of leaf C within the microbial food web, which was likely associated with a promoted availability of highly bioavailable metabolites of phototrophic origin. However, our results additionally confirm that the structure of the streambed modifies light-related changes in microbial C turnover. From our observations, we conclude that the streambed structure influences the strength of photo-heterotrophic interactions by defining the spatial availability of algal metabolites in the streambed and the composition of microbial communities. Collectively, our multifactorial approach provides valuable insights into environmental controls on the functioning of stream ecosystems.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MutzNobis2007,
  author    = {Mutz, Michael and Nobis, Tina},
  title     = {Politische Sozialisationsleistungen von Freiwilligenvereinigungen: Sportvereine und andere Freiwilligenvereinigungen im Vergleich},
  isbn      = {978-3-939390-66-4},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MutzBurrmann2009,
  author    = {Mutz, Michael and Burrmann, Ulrike},
  title     = {Schulische Arbeitsgemeinschaften als Kontexte f{\"u}r Freizeitaktivit{\"a}ten : Beteiligungschancen f{\"u}r sozial benachteiligte Jugendliche?},
  issn      = {1436-1957},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {School can be regarded as a context for a variety of leisure activities. Especially in all-day schools an increasing amount of young adolescents is spending more time in extracurricular activities. Therefore, all-day schools hold the potential to produce an "educational surplus" because it is argued that these activities contribute to the psychosocial development of adolescents. However, prior to the quest for possible developmental outcomes which could be related to extracurricular activities, another fundamental question must be responded to: Which groups of these young people do actually participate in such after-school programs? While analysing the socio-economic structure of participants for different school-organised activities, the article follows this query. For reasons of comparability, two other leisure contexts are examined: Clubs and volunteer associations as organised contexts on the one hand and a variety of informal and unstructured leisure activities on the other hand. The results reveal that extracurricular activities in schools succeed in including socially disadvantaged adolescents. The study is based on a secondary analysis of the German PISA 2000 data set.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Mutz2006,
  author    = {Mutz, Michael},
  title     = {Soziale Chancengleichheit in Bildungssystemen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-11563},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Inhalt: 1. Einleitung 2. Zur Korrelation zwischen Bildungsniveau und sozialer Herkunft 2.1. Die mikrosoziologische Perspektive 2.2. Die Ungleichheit famili{\"a}rer Lebenswelten 2.3. Bildungskarrieren als Ergebnisse rationaler Entscheidungen 3. Daten und Operationalisierung 4. Soziale Chancengleichheit im Kompetenzerwerb - der L{\"a}ndervergleich 5. Strukturmerkmale von Bildungssystemen und soziale Chancengleichheit 5.1. Die makrosoziologische Perspektive 5.2. Institutionelle Diskriminierung 5.3. Soziale Entmischung 5.4. Private und kostenpflichtige Schulangebote 6. Erkl{\"a}rungsmodelle zur l{\"a}nderspezifischen Reproduktion sozialer Ungleichheit 6.1. Modellbildung und Modellhypothesen 6.2. Ergebnisse der pfadanalytischen Erkl{\"a}rungsmodelle 6.3. Diskussion der Ergebnisse 7. Strukturtypen von Bildungssystemen und die soziale Chancengleichheit 7.1. Bildungsstrukturtypen 7.2. Die Strukturtypen und ihre "idealen" Vertreter 7.2.1. Finnland (Strukturtyp: reine Einheitsschule) 7.2.2. Großbritannien (Strukturtyp: Einheitsschule und Privatschulen) 7.2.3. Frankreich (Strukturtyp: Sp{\"a}te Differenzierung) 7.2.4. {\"O}sterreich (Strukturtyp: Fr{\"u}he Differenzierung nach Leistung) 7.2.5. Deutschland (Strukturtyp: Fr{\"u}he Differenzierung mit Elterneinfluss) 7.3. Strukturtypen und die Reproduktion sozialer Ungleichheit 8. Bildungsstrukturen als Ausdruck gesellschaftlicher Wohlfahrtsvorstellungen 9. Zusammenfassung},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MutzNobis2007,
  author    = {Mutz, Michael and Nobis, Tina},
  title     = {Zur Mitgliederstruktur von Freiwilligenvereinigungen},
  isbn      = {978-3-939390-66-4},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{HoltmannMutzAlberetal.2006,
  author    = {Holtmann, Dieter and Mutz, Michael and Alber, Florian and G{\"o}rl, Tilo and Buchheister, Claudia and Hinteregger, Sigrid and Gr{\"u}neberg, Franziska and Meisdrock, Claudia and Jeske, Lydia and Ratzlaff, Olaf and Arlt, Maria and Fink, Jana and Wille, Robin and Steinberg, Juliane and F{\"u}tterer, Bernhard and Balke, Gregor and Wache, Stephan and Benz, Caroline and Humcke, Daniela and Bruhn, Anja and Lapp, Joachim and Buhr, Stefanie and Zippka, Susanne and Thessel, Friedericke},
  title     = {Zur Performanz von Wohlfahrtsregimen und zu den Unterst{\"u}tzungspotentialen f{\"u}r die verschiedenen Wohlfahrtskonzepte},
  publisher = {Univ.-Verl.},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {3-939469-31-9},
  pages     = {286 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Wie Gesellschaften Wohlfahrt organisieren und institutionalisieren, dr{\"u}ckt ihre grundlegenden Wertvorstellungen {\"u}ber gutes Zusammenleben aus. Der Vergleich von Gesellschaften l{\"a}sst sich besonders fruchtbar mit dem Konzept der Wohlfahrtsregime durchf{\"u}hren, das die Logiken der Produktion und Verteilung von Wohlfahrt ins Zentrum stellt und mit dem Regimebegriff die zeitliche Entwicklung durch Regierungsphasen mit einer bestimmten politischen Ausrichtung thematisiert. Deshalb werden aufgrund einer Auseinandersetzung mit der sozialphilosophischen Diskussion acht Performanzkriterien entwickelt, die als Maßstab f{\"u}r den Vergleich von 28 L{\"a}ndern und f{\"u}nf Wohlfahrtsregimen verwendet werden: Wohlstand und Wachstum; {\"o}kologische Nachhaltigkeit; Innovation; soziale Sicherung durch Unterst{\"u}tzungsleistungen im Risikofall sowie vorsorgend durch Bildungsinvestitionen; Anerkennung der Besonderheiten (Frauenfreundlichkeit und Migrantenfreundlichkeit); Gleichheit der Teilhabe; soziale Integration; Autonomie („freedom of choice and capabilities"). Anschließend wird der Umbau der Wohlfahrtsregime anl{\"a}sslich der aktuellen Herausforderungen und Randbedingungen f{\"u}r die verschiedenen Wohlfahrtsregime diskutiert. Schließlich wird untersucht, welche Gruppen in welchen L{\"a}ndern welche der sechs Wohlfahrtskonzepte unterst{\"u}tzen, die sich bei der Faktorenanalyse von internationalen Einstellungssurveys ergeben.},
  language  = {de}
}