@article{SamarasNicolaeBoeckmannetal.2015, author = {Samaras, Stefanos and Nicolae, Doina and B{\"o}ckmann, Christine and Vasilescu, Jeni and Binietoglou, Ioannis and Labzovskii, Lev and Toanca, Florica and Papayannis, Alexandros}, title = {Using Raman-lidar-based regularized microphysical retrievals and Aerosol Mass Spectrometer measurements for the characterization of biomass burning aerosols}, series = {Journal of computational physics}, volume = {299}, journal = {Journal of computational physics}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {San Diego}, issn = {0021-9991}, doi = {10.1016/j.jcp.2015.06.045}, pages = {156 -- 174}, year = {2015}, abstract = {In this work we extract the microphysical properties of aerosols for a collection of measurement cases with low volume depolarization ratio originating from fire sources captured by the Raman lidar located at the National Institute of Optoelectronics (INOE) in Bucharest. Our algorithm was tested not only for pure smoke but also for mixed smoke and urban aerosols of variable age and growth. Applying a sensitivity analysis on initial parameter settings of our retrieval code was proved vital for producing semi-automatized retrievals with a hybrid regularization method developed at the Institute of Mathematics of Potsdam University. A direct quantitative comparison of the retrieved microphysical properties with measurements from a Compact Time of Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (CToF-AMS) is used to validate our algorithm. Microphysical retrievals performed with sun photometer data are also used to explore our results. Focusing on the fine mode we observed remarkable similarities between the retrieved size distribution and the one measured by the AMS. More complicated atmospheric structures and the factor of absorption appear to depend more on particle radius being subject to variation. A good correlation was found between the aerosol effective radius and particle age, using the ratio of lidar ratios (LR: aerosol extinction to backscatter ratios) as an indicator for the latter. Finally, the dependence on relative humidity of aerosol effective radii measured on the ground and within the layers aloft show similar patterns. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @article{BoeckmannWandingerAnsmannetal.2004, author = {B{\"o}ckmann, Christine and Wandinger, Ulla and Ansmann, Albert and B{\"o}senberg, Jens and Amiridis, Vassilis and Boselli, Antonella and Delaval, Arnaud and De Tomasi, Ferdinando de and Frioud, Max and Grigorov, Ivan Videnov and Hagard, Arne and Horvat, Matej and Iarlori, Marco and Komguem, Leonce and Kreipl, Stephan and Larchevque, Gilles and Matthias, Volker and Papayannis, Alexandros and Pappalardo, GGelsomina and Rocadenbosch, Francesc and Rodrigues, Jose Ant{\´o}nio and Schneider, Johannes and Shcherbakov, Valery and Wiegner, Matthias}, title = {Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project : 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms}, issn = {0003-6935}, year = {2004}, abstract = {An intercomparison of aerosol backscatter lidar algorithms was performed in 2001 within the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology (EARLINET). The objective of this research was to test the correctness of the algorithms and the influence of the lidar ratio used by the various lidar teams involved in the EARLINET for calculation of backscatter-coefficient profiles from the lidar signals. The exercise consisted of processing synthetic lidar signals of various degrees of difficulty. One of these profiles contained height- dependent lidar ratios to test the vertical influence of those profiles on the various retrieval algorithms. Furthermore, a realistic incomplete overlap of laser beam and receiver field of view was introduced to remind the teams to take great care in the nearest range to the lidar. The intercomparison was performed in three stages with increasing knowledge on the input parameters. First, only the lidar signals were distributed; this is the most realistic stage. Afterward the lidar ratio profiles and the reference values at calibration height were provided. The unknown height- dependent lidar ratio had the largest influence on the retrieval, whereas the unknown reference value was of minor importance. These results show the necessity of making additional independent measurements, which can provide us with a suitable approximation of the lidar ratio. The final stage proves in general, that the data evaluation schemes of the different groups of lidar systems work well. (C) 2004 Optical Society of America}, language = {en} }