@article{KuehneMeisterMaassetal.2019,
  author    = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Meister, Ramona and Maass, Ulrike and Paunov, Tatjana and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {How reliable are therapeutic competence ratings?},
  series = {Cognitive therapy and research},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Cognitive therapy and research},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0147-5916},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10608-019-10056-5},
  pages     = {241 -- 257},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Assessments of psychotherapeutic competencies play a crucial role in research and training. However, research on the reliability and validity of such assessments is sparse. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current evidence and to provide an average interrater reliability (IRR) of psychotherapeutic competence ratings. A systematic review was conducted, and 20 studies reported in 32 publications were collected. These 20 studies were included in a narrative synthesis, and 20 coefficients were entered into the meta-analysis. Most primary studies referred to cognitive-behavioral therapies and the treatment of depression, used the Cognitive Therapy Scale, based ratings on videos, and trained the raters. Our meta-analysis revealed a pooled ICC of 0.82, but at the same time severe heterogeneity. The evidence map highlighted a variety of variables related to competence assessments. Further aspects influencing the reliability of competence ratings and regarding the considerable heterogeneity are discussed in detail throughout the manuscript.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Saito2015,
  author    = {Saito, Toshinori},
  title     = {The Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT viewed from Nussbaum's Ten Central Capabilities},
  series = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT},
  journal   = {KEYCIT 2014 - Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1868-0844},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82718},
  pages     = {253 -- 266},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {This article shows a discussion about the key competencies in informatics and ICT viewed from a philosophical foundation presented by Martha Nussbaum, which is known as 'ten central capabilities'. Firstly, the outline of 'The Capability Approach', which has been presented by Amartya Sen and Nussbaum as a theoretical framework of assessing the state of social welfare, will be explained. Secondly, the body of Nussbaum's ten central capabilities and the reason for being applied as the basis of discussion will be shown. Thirdly, the relationship between the concept of 'capability' and 'competency' is to be discussed. After that, the author's assumption of the key competencies in informatics and ICT led from the examination of Nussbaum's ten capabilities will be presented.},
  language  = {en}
}