@article{OberauerLange2009,
  author    = {Oberauer, Klaus and Lange, Elke B.},
  title     = {Activation and binding in verbal working memory : a dual-process model for the recognition of nonwords},
  issn      = {0010-0285},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.003},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {The article presents a mathematical model of short-term recognition based on dual-process models and the three- component theory of working memory [Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411-421]. Familiarity arises from activated representations in long-term memory, ignoring their relations; recollection retrieves bindings in the capacity- limited component of working memory. In three experiments participants encoded two short lists of nonwords for immediate recognition, one of which was then cued as irrelevant. Probes from the irrelevant list were rejected more slowly than new probes; this was also found with probes recombining letters of irrelevant nonwords, suggesting that familiarity arises from individual letters independent of their relations. When asked to accept probes whose letters were all in the relevant list, regardless of their conjunction, participants accepted probes preserving the original conjunctions faster than recombinations, showing that recollection accessed feature bindings automatically. The model fit the data best when familiarity depended only on matching letters, whereas recollection used binding information.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OberauerMeyer2009,
  author    = {Oberauer, Klaus and Meyer, Nadine},
  title     = {The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect},
  issn      = {0965-8211},
  doi       = {10.1080/09658210903107861},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {The article reports an experiment testing whether the Hebb repetition effectthe gradual improvement of immediate serial recall when the same list is repeated several timesdepends on overt recall of the repeated lists. Previous reports which suggest that recall is critical confound the recall manipulation with retention interval. The present experiment orthogonally varies retention interval (0 or 9 s) and whether the list is to be recalled after the retention interval. Hebb repetition learning is assessed in a final test phase. A repetition effect was obtained in all four experimental conditions; it was larger for recalled than non-recalled lists, whereas retention interval had no effect. The results show that encoding is sufficient to generate cumulative long-term learning, which is strengthened by recall. Rehearsal, if it takes place in the retention interval at all, does not have the same effect on long-term learning as overt recall.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OberauerVockenberg2009,
  author    = {Oberauer, Klaus and Vockenberg, Kerstin},
  title     = {Updating of working memory : lingering bindings},
  issn      = {1747-0218},
  doi       = {10.1080/17470210802372912},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Three experiments investigated proactive interference and proactive facilitation in a memory-updating paradigm. Participants remembered several letters or spatial patterns, distinguished by their spatial positions, and updated them by new stimuli up to 20 times per trial. Self-paced updating times were shorter when an item previously remembered and then replaced reappeared in the same location than when it reappeared in a different location. This effect demonstrates residual memory for no-longer-relevant bindings of items to locations. The effect increased with the number of items to be remembered. With one exception, updating times did not increase, and recall of final values did not decrease, over successive updating steps, thus providing little evidence for proactive interference building up cumulatively.},
  language  = {en}
}