@article{BuchwaldWagelaarDanetal.2014,
  author    = {Buchwald, Sebastian and Wagelaar, Dennis and Dan, Li and Hegedues, Abel and Herrmannsdoerfer, Markus and Horn, Tassilo and Kalnina, Elina and Krause, Christian and Lano, Kevin and Lepper, Markus and Rensink, Arend and Rose, Louis and Waetzoldt, Sebastian and Mazanek, Steffen},
  title     = {A survey and comparison of transformation tools based on the transformation tool contest},
  series = {Science of computer programming},
  volume    = {85},
  journal   = {Science of computer programming},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0167-6423},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.scico.2013.10.009},
  pages     = {41 -- 99},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Model transformation is one of the key tasks in model-driven engineering and relies on the efficient matching and modification of graph-based data structures; its sibling graph rewriting has been used to successfully model problems in a variety of domains. Over the last years, a wide range of graph and model transformation tools have been developed all of them with their own particular strengths and typical application domains. In this paper, we give a survey and a comparison of the model and graph transformation tools that participated at the Transformation Tool Contest 2011. The reader gains an overview of the field and its tools, based on the illustrative solutions submitted to a Hello World task, and a comparison alongside a detailed taxonomy. The article is of interest to researchers in the field of model and graph transformation, as well as to software engineers with a transformation task at hand who have to choose a tool fitting to their needs. All solutions referenced in this article provide a SHARE demo. It supported the peer-review process for the contest, and now allows the reader to test the tools online.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LucioAmraniDingeletal.2016,
  author    = {Lucio, Levi and Amrani, Moussa and Dingel, Juergen and Lambers, Leen and Salay, Rick and Selim, Gehan M. K. and Syriani, Eugene and Wimmer, Manuel},
  title     = {Model transformation intents and their properties},
  series = {Software and systems modeling},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Software and systems modeling},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1619-1366},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10270-014-0429-x},
  pages     = {647 -- 684},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The notion of model transformation intent is proposed to capture the purpose of a transformation. In this paper, a framework for the description of model transformation intents is defined, which includes, for instance, a description of properties a model transformation has to satisfy to qualify as a suitable realization of an intent. Several common model transformation intents are identified, and the framework is used to describe six of them in detail. A case study from the automotive industry is used to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed framework for identifying crucial properties of model transformations with different intents and to illustrate the wide variety of model transformation intents that an industrial model-driven software development process typically encompasses.},
  language  = {en}
}