@article{TsuprykovChenHocheretal.2018,
  author    = {Tsuprykov, Oleg and Chen, Xin and Hocher, Carl-Friedrich and Skoblo, Roman and Yin, Lianghong and Hocher, Berthold},
  title     = {Why should we measure free 25(OH) vitamin D?},
  series = {The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology},
  volume    = {180},
  journal   = {The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0960-0760},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.11.014},
  pages     = {87 -- 104},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Vitamin D, either in its D-2 or D-3 form, is essential for normal human development during intrauterine life, kidney function and bone health. Vitamin D deficiency has also been linked to cancer development and some auto immune diseases. Given this huge impact of vitamin Don human health, it is important for daily clinical practice and clinical research to have reliable tools to judge on the vitamin D status. The major circulating form of vitamin D is 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), although it is not the most active metabolite, the concentrations of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the serum are currently routinely used in clinical practice to assess vitamin D status. In the circulation, vitamin D - like other steroid hormones - is bound tightly to a special carrier - vitamin D-binding protein (DBP). Smaller amounts are bound to blood proteins - albumin and lipoproteins. Only very tiny amounts of the total vitamin D are free and potentially biologically active. Currently used vitamin D assays do not distinguish between the three forms of vitamin D - DBP-bound vitamin D, albumin-bound vitamin D and free, biologically active vitamin D. Diseases or conditions that affect the synthesis of DBP or albumin thus have a huge impact on the amount of circulating total vitamin D. DBP and albumin are synthesized in the liver, hence all patients with an impairment of liver function have alterations in their total vitamin D blood concentrations, while free vitamin D levels remain mostly constant. Sex steroids, in particular estrogens, stimulate the synthesis of DBP. This explains why total vitamin D concentrations are higher during pregnancy as compared to nonpregnant women, while the concentrations of free vitamin D remain similar in both groups of women. The vitamin D-DBP as well as vitamin D-albumin complexes are filtered through the glomeruli and re-uptaken by megalin in the proximal tubule. Therefore, all acute and chronic kidney diseases that are characterized by a tubular damage, are associated with a loss of vitamin D-DBP complexes in the urine. Finally, the gene encoding DBP protein is highly polymorphic in different human racial groups. In the current review, we will discuss how liver function, estrogens, kidney function and the genetic background might influence total circulating vitamin D levels and will discuss what vitamin D metabolite is more appropriate to measure under these conditions: free vitamin D or total vitamin D.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TsuprykovBuseSkobloetal.2018,
  author    = {Tsuprykov, Oleg and Buse, Claudia and Skoblo, Roman and Haq, Afrozul and Hocher, Berthold},
  title     = {Reference intervals for measured and calculated free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in normal pregnancy},
  series = {The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology},
  volume    = {181},
  journal   = {The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0960-0760},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.03.005},
  pages     = {80 -- 87},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The determination of free 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) as compared to the analysis of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D might reflect better the vitamin D status during pregnancy, since vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) concentrations increase throughout pregnancy and the vast majority of 25(OH)D is tightly bound to DBP thus strongly influencing total 25(OH)D. The concentration of the biologically active free 25(OH)D - on the other hand - is much less dependent on the DBP concentrations. The study was conducted in May-June 2016 in 368 Caucasian pregnant healthy women - residents of Northeastern Germany. Free 25(OH)D was either measured directly by commercial ELISA kit or assessed by calculation via total 25(OH)D, DBP, and albumin serum concentrations. Regardless of the detection method, free 25(OH)D lowers in the 3rd trimester comparing to the 1st trimester (by 12\% and 21\%, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, for measured and calculated free 25(OH)D, respectively), whereas total 25(OH)D was not decreased in late pregnancy. DBP rises with gestational age. Total 25(OH)D was not correlated with serum calcium (p = 0.251), whereas free 25(OH)D was significantly (p = 0.007 for measured free 25(OH)D and p < 0.001 for calculated free 25(OH)D) positively correlated with calcium. All 25(OH) D isoforms were significantly negatively correlated with bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), however the correlation strength was the lowest with total 25(OH)D (rho = -0.108, p = 0.038), whereas both measured and calculated free 25(OH)D revealed better associations with BSAP (rho = -0.203 and rho = -0.211 for measured and calculated free 25(OH)D, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). We established pregnancy trimester specific reference intervals for free measured and calculated 25(OH)D and DBP. Both measured and calculated free 25(OH)D showed better correlations with parameters of the endocrine vitamin D system (calcium and BSAP). Both ways of measuring free 25(OH)D in pregnant women are suitable as novel laboratory parameter for vitamin D status monitoring during human pregnancy and might replace in the future the routine total 25(OH)D assessment.},
  language  = {en}
}