@article{DragičevićUllrichTsuietal.2020,
  author    = {Dragičević, Nikolina and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Tsui, Eric and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {A conceptual model of knowledge dynamics in the industry 4.0 smart grid scenario},
  series = {Knowledge management research \& practice : KMRP},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Knowledge management research \& practice : KMRP},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London [u.a.]},
  issn      = {1477-8238},
  doi       = {10.1080/14778238.2019.1633893},
  pages     = {199 -- 213},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Technological advancements are giving rise to the fourth industrial revolution - Industry 4.0 -characterized by the mass employment of smart objects in highly reconfigurable and thoroughly connected industrialproduct-service systems. The purpose of this paper is to propose a theory-based knowledgedynamics model in the smart grid scenario that would provide a holistic view on the knowledge-based interactions among smart objects, humans, and other actors as an underlyingmechanism of value co-creation in Industry 4.0. A multi-loop and three-layer - physical, virtual, and interface - model of knowledge dynamics is developedby building on the concept of ba - an enabling space for interactions and theemergence of knowledge. The model depicts how big data analytics are just one component inunlocking the value of big data, whereas the tacit engagement of humans-in-the-loop - theirsense-making and decision-making - is needed for insights to be evoked fromanalytics reports and customer needs to be met.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UllrichVladovaMarquartetal.2022,
  author    = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Marquart, Danny and Braun, Andreas and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {An overwiew of benefits and risks in open innovation projects and the influence of intermediary participation, decision-making authority, experience, and position on their perception},
  series = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of innovation management : IJIM},
  number    = {02},
  publisher = {World Scientific Publ.},
  address   = {Singapore},
  issn      = {1363-9196},
  doi       = {10.1142/S1363919622500128},
  pages     = {41},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper presents an exploratory study investigating the influence of the factors (1) intermediary participation, (2) decision-making authority, (3) position in the enterprise, and (4) experience in open innovation on the perception and assessment of the benefits and risks expected from participating in open innovation projects. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The result of this paper is an empirical evidence showing whether and how these factors affect the perception of potential benefits and risks expected within the context of open innovation project participation. Furthermore, the identified effects are discussed against the theory. Existing theory regarding the benefits and risks of open innovation is expanded by (1) finding that they are perceived mostly independently of the factors, (2) confirming the practical relevance of benefits and risks, and (3) enabling a finer distinction between their degrees of relevance according to respective contextual specifics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{UllrichVladovaEigelshovenetal.2022,
  author    = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Eigelshoven, Felix and Renz, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Data mining of scientific research on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {160},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58907},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-589077},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Teaching and learning as well as administrative processes are still experiencing intensive changes with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and its diverse application opportunities in the context of higher education. Therewith, the scientific interest in the topic in general, but also specific focal points rose as well. However, there is no structured overview on AI in teaching and administration processes in higher education institutions that allows to identify major research topics and trends, and concretizing peculiarities and develops recommendations for further action. To overcome this gap, this study seeks to systematize the current scientific discourse on AI in teaching and administration in higher education institutions. This study identified an (1) imbalance in research on AI in educational and administrative contexts, (2) an imbalance in disciplines and lack of interdisciplinary research, (3) inequalities in cross-national research activities, as well as (4) neglected research topics and paths. In this way, a comparative analysis between AI usage in administration and teaching and learning processes, a systematization of the state of research, an identification of research gaps as well as further research path on AI in higher education institutions are contributed to research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UllrichVladovaEigelshovenetal.2022,
  author    = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana and Eigelshoven, Felix and Renz, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Data mining of scientific research on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions},
  series = {Discover artificial intelligence},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Discover artificial intelligence},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  issn      = {2731-0809},
  doi       = {10.1007/s44163-022-00031-7},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Teaching and learning as well as administrative processes are still experiencing intensive changes with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and its diverse application opportunities in the context of higher education. Therewith, the scientific interest in the topic in general, but also specific focal points rose as well. However, there is no structured overview on AI in teaching and administration processes in higher education institutions that allows to identify major research topics and trends, and concretizing peculiarities and develops recommendations for further action. To overcome this gap, this study seeks to systematize the current scientific discourse on AI in teaching and administration in higher education institutions. This study identified an (1) imbalance in research on AI in educational and administrative contexts, (2) an imbalance in disciplines and lack of interdisciplinary research, (3) inequalities in cross-national research activities, as well as (4) neglected research topics and paths. In this way, a comparative analysis between AI usage in administration and teaching and learning processes, a systematization of the state of research, an identification of research gaps as well as further research path on AI in higher education institutions are contributed to research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DragičevićVladovaUllrich2023,
  author    = {Dragičević, Nikolina and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Design thinking capabilities in the digital world},
  series = {Frontiers in Education},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Education},
  publisher = {Frontiers},
  address   = {Lausanne, Schweiz},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Recent research suggests that design thinking practices may foster the development of needed capabilities in new digitalised landscapes. However, existing publications represent individual contributions, and we lack a holistic understanding of the value of design thinking in a digital world. No review, to date, has offered a holistic retrospection of this research. In response, in this bibliometric review, we aim to shed light on the intellectual structure of multidisciplinary design thinking literature related to capabilities relevant to the digital world in higher education and business settings, highlight current trends and suggest further studies to advance theoretical and empirical underpinnings. Our study addresses this aim using bibliometric methods—bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis as they are particularly suitable for identifying current trends and future research priorities at the forefront of the research. Overall, bibliometric analyses of the publications dealing with the related topics published in the last 10 years (extracted from the Web of Science database) expose six trends and two possible future research developments highlighting the expanding scope of the design thinking scientific field related to capabilities required for the (more sustainable and human-centric) digital world. Relatedly, design thinking becomes a relevant approach to be included in higher education curricula and human resources training to prepare students and workers for the changing work demands. This paper is well-suited for education and business practitioners seeking to embed design thinking capabilities in their curricula and for design thinking and other scholars wanting to understand the field and possible directions for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DragičevićVladovaUllrich2023,
  author    = {Dragičević, Nikolina and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Design thinking capabilities in the digital world},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {158},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58846},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-588468},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Recent research suggests that design thinking practices may foster the development of needed capabilities in new digitalised landscapes. However, existing publications represent individual contributions, and we lack a holistic understanding of the value of design thinking in a digital world. No review, to date, has offered a holistic retrospection of this research. In response, in this bibliometric review, we aim to shed light on the intellectual structure of multidisciplinary design thinking literature related to capabilities relevant to the digital world in higher education and business settings, highlight current trends and suggest further studies to advance theoretical and empirical underpinnings. Our study addresses this aim using bibliometric methods—bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis as they are particularly suitable for identifying current trends and future research priorities at the forefront of the research. Overall, bibliometric analyses of the publications dealing with the related topics published in the last 10 years (extracted from the Web of Science database) expose six trends and two possible future research developments highlighting the expanding scope of the design thinking scientific field related to capabilities required for the (more sustainable and human-centric) digital world. Relatedly, design thinking becomes a relevant approach to be included in higher education curricula and human resources training to prepare students and workers for the changing work demands. This paper is well-suited for education and business practitioners seeking to embed design thinking capabilities in their curricula and for design thinking and other scholars wanting to understand the field and possible directions for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Ullrich2018,
  author    = {Ullrich, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Eigenschaften wandlungsf{\"a}higer Systeme},
  publisher = {GITO},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-95545-265-0},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {XIX, 403},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Wandlungsf{\"a}higkeit beschreibt die F{\"a}higkeit eines Systems, proaktiv oder reaktiv Maßnahmen f{\"u}r die Modifikation seiner Eigenschaften schnell und effizient zu entwickeln, umzusetzen und anzuwenden sowie sich proaktiv darauf vorzubereiten, inaktiv zu sein und passiv Einwirkungen aus der Umwelt zu tolerieren. Die Eigenschaften wandlungsf{\"a}higer Systeme werden h{\"a}ufig als Indikatoren (z.B. Modularit{\"a}t, Wissen) verwendet. Dabei existiert eine Vielzahl potenzieller Indikatoren, deren jeweilige Relevanz jedoch ungekl{\"a}rt ist. Hier setzt die Zielstellung der vorliegenden Arbeit an. Das Erkenntnisziel ist die Erkl{\"a}rung der Wandlungsf{\"a}higkeit sozio-technischer Systeme. Zu diesem Zweck wird ein Erkl{\"a}rungsmodell der indikatorbasierten Wandlungsf{\"a}higkeit erstellt, das zum Nachweis von Wandlungsf{\"a}higkeit, zur Bewertung dieser sowie zur Systemanalyse genutzt werden kann. Weiterhin wird exemplarisch eine positive Korrelation von Wandlungsf{\"a}higkeit und Schnelligkeit sowie Effizienz bei Ver{\"a}nderungsprojekten nachgewiesen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching - How it was influenced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086},
  pages     = {15},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert},
  title     = {Students' Acceptance of Technology-Mediated Teaching - How It Was Influenced During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study From Germany},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-52161},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-521615},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.},
  language  = {en}
}