@article{SchroederTiberiusBounckenetal.2020,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Katharina and Tiberius, Victor and Bouncken, Ricarda B. and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Strategic entrepreneurship},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1355-2554},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJEBR-11-2020-0798},
  pages     = {753 -- 776},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose: Strategic entrepreneurship (SE) depicts the nexus of strategic management and entrepreneurship, suggesting that firms can create superior wealth when simultaneously pursuing advantage-seeking and opportunity-seeking behavior. As the rapid growth in SE research led to a multidisciplinary, scattered and fragmented literature landscape, the authors aim to structure this research field. Design/methodology/approach: The authors employ a bibliographic coupling and literature review of the strategic entrepreneurship research field. Findings: The authors identify and describe five major research streams with 15 sub-themes in recent SE research. Based on our findings, the authors propose an integrated research framework and research gaps for future research. Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review on SE based on a bibliographic coupling.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrausTraunmuellerKaileretal.2020,
  author    = {Kraus, Sascha and Traunm{\"u}ller, Verena and Kailer, Norbert and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {The dark triad in entrepreneurship research},
  series = {Journal of enterprising culture : JEC},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Journal of enterprising culture : JEC},
  number    = {04},
  publisher = {World Scientific},
  address   = {Singapore},
  issn      = {0218-4958},
  doi       = {10.1142/S0218495820500156},
  pages     = {353 -- 373},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The impact of traits in entrepreneurship has been subject to intense discussion. Apart from favorable traits fostering opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial orientation, venture performance, and other variables, a younger research stream also addresses the role of negative traits. Among them, the dark triad, comprising of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, have gained specific attention. This systematic literature review aims to structure the field, identify current research themes, and provide a better understanding of prior research outcomes. Our results show that dark triad research addresses entrepreneurial activity, opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial leadership, the and entrepreneurial motives. Among the dark triad traits, narcissism is stressed most in research so far. It relates to firm performance, risk, and leadership behavior, whereas Machiavellianism and psychopathy relate to opportunity recognition and exploitation. We also identify several research gaps, which can be addressed in future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrausLiKangetal.2020,
  author    = {Kraus, Sascha and Li, Hongbo and Kang, Qi and Westhead, Paul and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {The sharing economy},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1355-2554},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438},
  pages     = {1769 -- 1786},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Quantitative bibliometric approaches were used to statistically and objectively explore patterns in the sharing economy literature. Design/methodology/approach Journal (co-)citation analysis, author (co-)citation analysis, institution citation and co-operation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, document (co-)citation analysis and burst detection analysis were conducted based on a bibliometric data set relating to sharing economy publications. Findings Sharing economy research is multi- and interdisciplinary. Journals focused upon products liability, organizing framework, profile characteristics, diverse economies, consumption system and everyday life themes. Authors focused upon profile characteristics, sharing economy organization, social connections, first principle and diverse economy themes. No institution dominated the research field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified organizing framework, tourism industry, consumer behavior, food waste, generous exchange and quality cue as research themes. Document co-citation analysis found research themes relating to the tourism industry, exploring public acceptability, agri-food system, commercial orientation, products liability and social connection. Most cited authors, institutions and documents are reported. Research limitations/implications The study did not exclusively focus on publications in top-tier journals. Future studies could run analyses relating to top-tier journals alone, and then run analyses relating to less renowned journals alone. To address the potential fuzzy results concern, reviews could focus on business and/or management research alone. Longitudinal reviews conducted over several points in time are warranted. Future reviews could combine qualitative and quantitative approaches. Originality/value We contribute by analyzing information relating to the population of all sharing economy articles. In addition, we contribute by employing several quantitative bibliometric approaches that enable the identification of trends relating to the themes and patterns in the growing literature.},
  language  = {en}
}