@article{HoelzleBoerBjoerk2020,
  author    = {H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Boer, Harry and Bj{\"o}rk, Jennie},
  title     = {Creativity in and from people, processes, objects, and war zones},
  series = {Creativity and innovation management},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Creativity and innovation management},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0963-1690},
  doi       = {10.1111/caim.12405},
  pages     = {377 -- 379},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{HoelzleBoerBjoerk2020,
  author    = {H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Boer, Harry and Bj{\"o}rk, Jennie},
  title     = {Crisis management through creativity and innovation},
  series = {Creativity and innovation management},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Creativity and innovation management},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford [u.a.]},
  issn      = {0963-1690},
  doi       = {10.1111/caim.12385},
  pages     = {195 -- 197},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoelzlePuteanusBirkenbachWagner2015,
  author    = {H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja and Wagner, Dieter},
  title     = {Das Potsdamer Modell der Entrepreneurship Education},
  series = {Entrepreneurship education : das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}ndungslehre und -beratung},
  journal   = {Entrepreneurship education : das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}ndungslehre und -beratung},
  publisher = {BoD},
  address   = {Norderstedt},
  isbn      = {978-3-7357-6095-1},
  pages     = {VII -- IX},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmeissHoelzleTech2019,
  author    = {Schmeiss, Jessica and H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Tech, Robin P. G.},
  title     = {Designing Governance Mechanisms in Platform Ecosystems: Addressing the Paradox of Openness through Blockchain Technology},
  series = {California Management Review},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {California Management Review},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0008-1256},
  doi       = {10.1177/0008125619883618},
  pages     = {121 -- 143},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The paradox of openness is inherent to all platform ecosystems-the tension in enabling maximum openness to create joint innovation while guaranteeing value capturing for all actors. Governance mechanisms to solve this paradox are embedded into the technical architecture of the platform, addressing the dimensions of access, control, and incentives. Blockchain technology offers unique ways to design novel governance mechanisms through the standardization of interactions. However, the design of such an architecture requires careful consideration of the cost associated with it.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoelzlePuteanusBirkenbach2015,
  author    = {H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja},
  title     = {Die Entrepreneurship Academy Potsdam},
  series = {Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}dungslehre und -beratung},
  journal   = {Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}dungslehre und -beratung},
  publisher = {BoD},
  address   = {Norderstedt},
  isbn      = {978-3-7357-6095-1},
  pages     = {53 -- 57},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{PuteanusBirkenbachHoelzle2015,
  author    = {Puteanus-Birkenbach, Katja and H{\"o}lzle, Katharina},
  title     = {Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur oder der Begriff des unternehmerischen Denken und Handelns},
  series = {Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}ndungslehre und -beratung},
  journal   = {Entrepreneurship education: das Potsdamer Modell der Gr{\"u}ndungslehre und -beratung},
  publisher = {BoD},
  address   = {Norderstedt},
  isbn      = {978-3-7357-6095-1},
  pages     = {85 -- 95},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GoepelHoelzleKnyphausenAufsess2012,
  author    = {G{\"o}pel, Monique and H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Knyphausen-Aufsess, Dodo Zu},
  title     = {Individuals' innovation response behaviour a framework of antecedents and opportunities for future research},
  series = {Creativity and innovation management},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Creativity and innovation management},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0963-1690},
  doi       = {10.1111/caim.12000},
  pages     = {412 -- 426},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Innovation response behaviour is defined as individuals novelty-supporting or novelty-impeding action when navigating innovation initiatives through the organization. A typology of innovation response behaviour is developed, distinguishing between active and passive modes of conduct for novelty-supporting and novelty-impeding behaviour, respectively. The antecedents of innovation response behaviour are delineated based on West and Farr's five-factor model of individual innovation. Moreover, we argue that within organizational contexts, individuals often fail to implement their ideas due to innovation barriers, perceived as factors that are beyond their control. Based on the theory of planned behaviour, we reveal how these barriers influence individuals intentional and exhibited innovation response behaviour. Propositions about proximal and distal antecedents of individuals innovation response behaviour are derived. Proposing a research framework to study the organizational process of innovation from an actor-based perspective, this paper intends to link existing research on individual innovation with the process of innovation at the organizational level, explicitly accounting for the socio-political dynamics and arising managerial problems associated with successful innovation implementation within organizational realities. Implications for research in innovation management are discussed and avenues for future research outlined.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoelzleRhinow2019,
  author    = {H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Rhinow, Holger},
  title     = {The Dilemmas of Design Thinking in Innovation Projects},
  series = {Project Management Journal},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Project Management Journal},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {8756-9728},
  doi       = {10.1177/8756972819853129},
  pages     = {418 -- 430},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Organizations have discovered Design Thinking as a promising framework or language for innovation-focused project teamwork. The goal is to develop new products and services by being customer-centric and working iteratively and in an interdisciplinary way, using specific working principles and methods to create a common language among all stakeholders. The empirical results in this article show that Design Thinking teamwork is different from other forms of teamwork. The difference in Design Thinking team-based project work is that the teams go through a specific learning process that poses individual challenges but also provides the individual with experience-based learning. We show that teams going through this learning process repeatedly find themselves in seemingly insolvable conflicts-so called structural dilemmas-within the framework of project deadlines and under the influence of strategic guidelines of the organization. We explore these structural dilemmas and develop ways to overcome them.},
  language  = {en}
}