@inproceedings{AbramovaGladkayaKrasnova2021,
  author    = {Abramova, Olga and Gladkaya, Margarita and Krasnova, Hanna},
  title     = {An unusual encounter with oneself},
  series = {ICIS 2021: IS and the future of work},
  booktitle = {ICIS 2021: IS and the future of work},
  publisher = {AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)},
  address   = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Helping overcome distance, the use of videoconferencing tools has surged during the pandemic. To shed light on the consequences of videoconferencing at work, this study takes a granular look at the implications of the self-view feature for meeting outcomes. Building on self-awareness research and self-regulation theory, we argue that by heightening the state of self-awareness, self-view engagement depletes participants' mental resources and thereby can undermine online meeting outcomes. Evaluation of our theoretical model on a sample of 179 employees reveals a nuanced picture. Self-view engagement while speaking and while listening is positively associated with self-awareness, which, in turn, is negatively associated with satisfaction with meeting process, perceived productivity, and meeting enjoyment. The criticality of the communication role is put forward: looking at self while listening to other attendees has a negative direct and indirect effect on meeting outcomes; however, looking at self while speaking produces equivocal effects.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AbramovaWagnerOltetal.2022,
  author    = {Abramova, Olga and Wagner, Amina and Olt, Christian M. and Buxmann, Peter},
  title     = {One for all, all for one},
  series = {International Journal of Information Management},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {International Journal of Information Management},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Kidlington},
  issn      = {0268-4012},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102473},
  pages     = {1 -- 16},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {We propose a conceptual model of acceptance of contact tracing apps based on the privacy calculus perspective. Moving beyond the duality of personal benefits and privacy risks, we theorize that users hold social considerations (i.e., social benefits and risks) that underlie their acceptance decisions. To test our propositions, we chose the context of COVID-19 contact tracing apps and conducted a qualitative pre-study and longitudinal quantitative main study with 589 participants from Germany and Switzerland. Our findings confirm the prominence of individual privacy calculus in explaining intention to use and actual behavior. While privacy risks are a significant determinant of intention to use, social risks (operationalized as fear of mass surveillance) have a notably stronger impact. Our mediation analysis suggests that social risks represent the underlying mechanism behind the observed negative link between individual privacy risks and contact tracing apps' acceptance. Furthermore, we find a substantial intention-behavior gap.},
  language  = {en}
}