@article{FangHolzmuellerMatulaitisetal.2016,
  author    = {Fang, Lijia and Holzmueller, Felix and Matulaitis, Tomas and Baasner, Anne and Hauenstein, Christoph and Benduhn, Johannes and Schwarze, Martin and Petrich, Annett and Piersimoni, Fortunato and Scholz, Reinhard and Zeika, Olaf and Koerner, Christian and Neher, Dieter and Vandewal, Koen and Leo, Karl},
  title     = {Fluorine-containing low-energy-gap organic dyes with low voltage losses for organic solar cells},
  series = {Synthetic metals : the journal of electronic polymers and electronic molecular materials},
  volume    = {222},
  journal   = {Synthetic metals : the journal of electronic polymers and electronic molecular materials},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {0379-6779},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.10.025},
  pages     = {232 -- 239},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Fluorine-containing donor molecules TFTF, CNTF and PRTF are designed and isomer selectively synthesized for application in vacuum-deposited organic solar cells. These molecules comprise a donor acceptor molecular architecture incorporating thiophene and benzothiadiazole derivatives as the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing moieties, respectively. As opposed to previously reported materials from this class, PRTF can be purified by vacuum sublimation at moderate to high yields because of its higher volatility and better stabilization due to a stronger intramolecular hydrogen bond, as compared to TFTF and CNTF. The UV-vis absorption spectra of the three donors show an intense broadband absorption between 500 nm and 800 nm with, similar positions of their frontier energy levels. The photophysical properties of the three donor molecules are thoroughly tested and optimized in bulk heterojunction solar cells with C-60 as acceptor. PRTF shows the best performance, yielding power conversion efficiencies of up to 3.8\%. Moreover, the voltage loss for the PRTF device due to the non radiative recombination of free charge carriers is exceptionally low (0.26 V) as compared to typical values for organic solar cells (>0.34V). (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.},
  language  = {en}
}