@article{JobstKoeppenLindbergetal.2012,
  author    = {Jobst, Birgit and K{\"o}ppen, Eva and Lindberg, Tilmann and Moritz, Josephine and Rhinow, Holger and Meinel, Christoph},
  title     = {The faith-factor in design thinking : creative confidence through education at the design thinking schools Potsdam and Standford?},
  isbn      = {978-3-642-31990-7},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HoelzleRhinow2019,
  author    = {H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Rhinow, Holger},
  title     = {The Dilemmas of Design Thinking in Innovation Projects},
  series = {Project Management Journal},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Project Management Journal},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {8756-9728},
  doi       = {10.1177/8756972819853129},
  pages     = {418 -- 430},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Organizations have discovered Design Thinking as a promising framework or language for innovation-focused project teamwork. The goal is to develop new products and services by being customer-centric and working iteratively and in an interdisciplinary way, using specific working principles and methods to create a common language among all stakeholders. The empirical results in this article show that Design Thinking teamwork is different from other forms of teamwork. The difference in Design Thinking team-based project work is that the teams go through a specific learning process that poses individual challenges but also provides the individual with experience-based learning. We show that teams going through this learning process repeatedly find themselves in seemingly insolvable conflicts-so called structural dilemmas-within the framework of project deadlines and under the influence of strategic guidelines of the organization. We explore these structural dilemmas and develop ways to overcome them.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{SchmiedgenRhinowKoeppenetal.2015,
  author    = {Schmiedgen, Jan and Rhinow, Holger and K{\"o}ppen, Eva and Meinel, Christoph},
  title     = {Parts without a whole?},
  number    = {97},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-334-3},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-79969},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {143},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {This explorative study gives a descriptive overview of what organizations do and experience when they say they practice design thinking. It looks at how the concept has been appropriated in organizations and also describes patterns of design thinking adoption. The authors use a mixed-method research design fed by two sources: questionnaire data and semi-structured personal expert interviews. The study proceeds in six parts: (1) design thinking¹s entry points into organizations; (2) understandings of the descriptor; (3) its fields of application and organizational localization; (4) its perceived impact; (5) reasons for its discontinuation or failure; and (6) attempts to measure its success. In conclusion the report challenges managers to be more conscious of their current design thinking practice. The authors suggest a co-evolution of the concept¹s introduction with innovation capability building and the respective changes in leadership approaches. It is argued that this might help in unfolding design thinking¹s hidden potentials as well as preventing unintended side-effects such as discontented teams or the dwindling authority of managers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Rhinow2017,
  author    = {Rhinow, Holger},
  title     = {Design Thinking als Lernprozess in Organisationen},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {138},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}