@article{RoseHoelzleBjoerk2020, author = {Rose, Robert and H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Bj{\"o}rk, Jennie}, title = {More than a quarter century of creativity and innovation management}, series = {Creativity and innovation management}, volume = {29}, journal = {Creativity and innovation management}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0963-1690}, doi = {10.1111/caim.12361}, pages = {5 -- 20}, year = {2020}, abstract = {When this journal was founded in 1992 by Tudor Rickards and Susan Moger, there was no academic outlet available that addressed issues at the intersection of creativity and innovation. From zero to 1,163 records, from the new kid on the block to one of the leading journals in creativity and innovation management has been quite a journey, and we would like to reflect on the past 28 years and the intellectual and conceptual structure of Creativity and Innovation Management (CIM). Specifically, we highlight milestones and influential articles, identify how key journal characteristics evolved, outline the (co-)authorship structure, and finally, map the thematic landscape of CIM by means of a text-mining analysis. This study represents the first systematic and comprehensive assessment of the journal's published body of knowledge and helps to understand the journal's influence on the creativity and innovation management community. We conclude by discussing future topics and paths of the journal as well as limitations of our approach.}, language = {en} } @article{FilserTiberiusKrausetal.2020, author = {Filser, Matthias and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha and Spitzer, Jonathan and Kailer, Norbert and Bouncken, Ricarda B.}, title = {Sharing economy}, series = {International journal of entrepreneurial venturing}, volume = {12}, journal = {International journal of entrepreneurial venturing}, number = {6}, publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises}, address = {Gen{\`e}ve}, issn = {1742-5360}, doi = {10.1504/IJEV.2020.112234}, pages = {665 -- 665}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The sharing economy has received increased attention in entrepreneurship research, resulting in a complex research landscape that is hard to overlook. Using a bibliometric analysis, we aim to further synthesise the field by: 1) summarising the most important definitions given by extant literature to capture the common understanding of the sharing economy; 2) identifying three thematic clusters based on the top 20 most cited publications; 3) conducting a citation analysis to show interdependencies between all authors; and 4) identifying the research methods used in the SE publications. Our results show: 1) many definitions with different emphases; 2) conceptualisation, collaborative consumption/ownership and the disruptive character of the sharing economy as three dominant research clusters; 3) a fairly even citation practice allowing for unbiased future research; and 4) that conceptual publications and quantitative as well as qualitative studies are fairly evenly published.}, language = {en} }