@article{JuangMoffittKimetal.2016,
  author    = {Juang, Linda P. and Moffitt, Ursula Elinor and Kim, Su Yeong and Lee, Richard M. and Soto, Jose Angel and Hurley, Eric and Weisskirch, Robert S. and Blozis, Shelley A. and Castillo, Linda G. and Huynh, Que-Lam and Whitborne, Susan Krauss},
  title     = {Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression: Links to racial-ethnic discrimination and adjustment among Latino/a and Asian-heritage college students},
  series = {Journal of adolescence},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Journal of adolescence},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0140-1971},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.08.012},
  pages     = {21 -- 33},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Objective: We examined whether two key emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression, moderated the relations between discrimination (i.e., foreigner objectification and general denigration) and adjustment. Methods: Participants were U.S. Latino/a and Asian-heritage college students (N = 1,279, 67\% female, 72\% U.S. born) from the Multi-Site University Study of Identity and Culture (MUSIC). Students completed online self-report surveys in 2009. Results: Multi-group path analysis demonstrated that a fully constrained model fit well for both Latino/a and Asian-heritage student data. The results showed that with increasing levels of denigration (but not foreigner objectification), the combination of lower cognitive reappraisal and higher expressive suppression was related to greater depressive symptoms, anxiety, and aggression. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of examining multiple emotion regulation strategies simultaneously considering what strategies are available to individuals and in what combination they are used to understand how best to deal with negative emotions resulting from experiencing discrimination. (C) 2016 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CaliendoLee2013,
  author    = {Caliendo, Marco and Lee, Wang-Sheng},
  title     = {Fat chance! - Obesity and the transition from unemployment to employment},
  series = {Economics and human biology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Economics and human biology},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1570-677X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ehb.2012.02.002},
  pages     = {121 -- 133},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {This paper focuses on estimating the magnitude of any potential weight discrimination by examining whether obese job applicants in Germany get treated or behave differently from non-obese applicants. Based on two waves of rich survey data from the IZA Evaluation dataset, which includes measures that control for education, demographic characteristics, labor market history, psychological factors and health, we estimate differences in job search behavior and labor market outcomes between obese/overweight and normal weight individuals. Unlike other observational studies which are generally based on obese and non-obese individuals who might already be at different points in the job ladder (e.g., household surveys), in our data, individuals are newly unemployed and all start from the same point. The only subgroup we find in our data experiencing any possible form of negative labor market outcomes is obese women. Despite making more job applications and engaging more in job training programs, we find some indications that they experienced worse (or at best similar) employment outcomes than normal weight women. Obese women who found a job also had significantly lower wages than normal weight women.},
  language  = {en}
}