@phdthesis{Wotschack2009,
  author    = {Wotschack, Christiane},
  title     = {Eye movements in reading strategies : how reading strategies modulate effects of distributed processing and oculomotor control},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-021-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-36846},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {213},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Throughout its empirical research history eye movement research has always been aware of the differences in reading behavior induced by individual differences and task demands. This work introduces a novel comprehensive concept of reading strategy, comprising individual differences in reading style and reading skill as well as reader goals. In a series of sentence reading experiments recording eye movements, the influence of reading strategies on reader- and word-level effects assuming distributed processing has been investigated. Results provide evidence for strategic, top-down influences on eye movement control that extend our understanding of eye guidance in reading.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TrukenbrodEngbert2012,
  author    = {Trukenbrod, Hans Arne and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {Eye movements in a sequential scanning task - evidence for distributed processing},
  series = {Journal of vision},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of vision},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Association for Research in Vision and Opthalmology},
  address   = {Rockville},
  issn      = {1534-7362},
  doi       = {10.1167/12.1.5},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Current models of eye movement control are derived from theories assuming serial processing of single items or from theories based on parallel processing of multiple items at a time. This issue has persisted because most investigated paradigms generated data compatible with both serial and parallel models. Here, we study eye movements in a sequential scanning task, where stimulus n indicates the position of the next stimulus n + 1. We investigate whether eye movements are controlled by sequential attention shifts when the task requires serial order of processing. Our measures of distributed processing in the form of parafoveal-on-foveal effects, long-range modulations of target selection, and skipping saccades provide evidence against models strictly based on serial attention shifts. We conclude that our results lend support to parallel processing as a strategy for eye movement control.},
  language  = {en}
}