@misc{AguadoCabalarFandinnoetal.2019,
  author    = {Aguado, Felicidad and Cabalar, Pedro and Fandinno, Jorge and Pearce, David and Perez, Gilberto and Vidal, Concepcion},
  title     = {Revisiting explicit negation in answer set programming},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {1104},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-46969},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-469697},
  pages     = {908 -- 924},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {A common feature in Answer Set Programming is the use of a second negation, stronger than default negation and sometimes called explicit, strong or classical negation. This explicit negation is normally used in front of atoms, rather than allowing its use as a regular operator. In this paper we consider the arbitrary combination of explicit negation with nested expressions, as those defined by Lifschitz, Tang and Turner. We extend the concept of reduct for this new syntax and then prove that it can be captured by an extension of Equilibrium Logic with this second negation. We study some properties of this variant and compare to the already known combination of Equilibrium Logic with Nelson's strong negation.},
  language  = {en}
}