@misc{HofreiterPaijmansGoodchildetal.2015,
  author    = {Hofreiter, Michael and Paijmans, Johanna L. A. and Goodchild, Helen and Speller, Camilla F. and Barlow, Axel and Gonzalez-Fortes, Gloria M. and Thomas, Jessica A. and Ludwig, Arne and Collins, Matthew J.},
  title     = {The future of ancient DNA},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {908},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43881},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438816},
  pages     = {284 -- 295},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Technological innovations such as next generation sequencing and DNA hybridisation enrichment have resulted in multi-fold increases in both the quantity of ancient DNA sequence data and the time depth for DNA retrieval. To date, over 30 ancient genomes have been sequenced, moving from 0.7x coverage (mammoth) in 2008 to more than 50x coverage (Neanderthal) in 2014. Studies of rapid evolutionary changes, such as the evolution and spread of pathogens and the genetic responses of hosts, or the genetics of domestication and climatic adaptation, are developing swiftly and the importance of palaeogenomics for investigating evolutionary processes during the last million years is likely to increase considerably. However, these new datasets require new methods of data processing and analysis, as well as conceptual changes in interpreting the results. In this review we highlight important areas of future technical and conceptual progress and discuss research topics in the rapidly growing field of palaeogenomics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BaslerXenikoudakisWestburyetal.2017,
  author    = {Basler, Nikolas and Xenikoudakis, Georgios and Westbury, Michael V. and Song, Lingfeng and Sheng, Guilian and Barlow, Axel},
  title     = {Reduction of the contaminant fraction of DNA obtained from an ancient giant panda bone},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {715},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42815},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-428151},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Objective: A key challenge in ancient DNA research is massive microbial DNA contamination from the deposition site which accumulates post mortem in the study organism's remains. Two simple and cost-effective methods to enrich the relative endogenous fraction of DNA in ancient samples involve treatment of sample powder with either bleach or Proteinase K pre-digestion prior to DNA extraction. Both approaches have yielded promising but vary-ing results in other studies. Here, we contribute data on the performance of these methods using a comprehensive and systematic series of experiments applied to a single ancient bone fragment from a giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).Results: Bleach and pre-digestion treatments increased the endogenous DNA content up to ninefold. However, the absolute amount of DNA retrieved was dramatically reduced by all treatments. We also observed reduced DNA damage patterns in pre-treated libraries compared to untreated ones, resulting in longer mean fragment lengths and reduced thymine over-representation at fragment ends. Guanine-cytosine (GC) contents of both mapped and total reads are consistent between treatments and conform to general expectations, indicating no obvious biasing effect of the applied methods. Our results therefore confirm the value of bleach and pre-digestion as tools in palaeog-enomic studies, providing sufficient material is available.},
  language  = {en}
}