@article{BarthWeingartenKuettnerRaymond2021,
  author    = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander and Raymond, Chase Wesley},
  title     = {Pivots revisited},
  series = {Open linguistics},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Open linguistics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Warsaw},
  issn      = {2300-9969},
  doi       = {10.1515/opli-2020-0152},
  pages     = {613 -- 637},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The term "pivot" usually refers to two overlapping syntactic units such that the completion of the first unit simultaneously launches the second. In addition, pivots are generally said to be characterized by the smooth prosodic integration of their syntactic parts. This prosodic integration is typically achieved by prosodic-phonetic matching of the pivot components. As research on such turns in a range of languages has illustrated, speakers routinely deploy pivots so as to be able to continue past a point of possible turn completion, in the service of implementing some additional or revised action. This article seeks to build on, and complement, earlier research by exploring two issues in more detail as follows: (1) what exactly do pivotal turn extensions accomplish on the action dimension, and (2) what role does prosodic-phonetic packaging play in this? We will show that pivot constructions not only exhibit various degrees of prosodic-phonetic (non-)integration, i.e., differently strong cesuras, but that they can be ordered on a continuum, and that this cline maps onto the relationship of the actions accomplished by the components of the pivot construction. While tighter prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., weak(er) cesuring, co-occurs with post-pivot actions whose relationship to that of the pre-pivot tends to be rather retrospective in character, looser prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., strong(er) cesuring, is associated with a more prospective orientation of the post-pivot's action. These observations also raise more general questions with regard to the analysis of action.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BarthWeingartenOgden2021,
  author    = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Ogden, Richard},
  title     = {"Chunking" spoken language},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-53625},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-536259},
  pages     = {531 -- 548},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this introductory paper to the special issue on "Weak cesuras in talk-in-interaction", we aim to guide the reader into current work on the "chunking" of naturally occurring talk. It is conducted in the methodological frameworks of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics - two approaches that consider the interactional aspect of humans talking with each other to be a crucial starting point for its analysis. In doing so, we will (1) lay out the background of this special issue (what is problematic about "chunking" talk-in-interaction, the characteristics of the methodological approach chosen by the contributors, the cesura model), (2) highlight what can be gained from such a revised understanding of "chunking" in talk-in-interaction by referring to previous work with this model as well as the findings of the contributions to this special issue, and (3) indicate further directions such work could take starting from papers in this special issue. We hope to induce a fruitful exchange on the phenomena discussed, across methodological divides.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BarthWeingartenOgden2021,
  author    = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Ogden, Richard},
  title     = {"Chunking" spoken language},
  series = {Open linguistics},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Open linguistics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2300-9969},
  doi       = {10.1515/opli-2020-0173},
  pages     = {531 -- 548},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this introductory paper to the special issue on "Weak cesuras in talk-in-interaction", we aim to guide the reader into current work on the "chunking" of naturally occurring talk. It is conducted in the methodological frameworks of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics - two approaches that consider the interactional aspect of humans talking with each other to be a crucial starting point for its analysis. In doing so, we will (1) lay out the background of this special issue (what is problematic about "chunking" talk-in-interaction, the characteristics of the methodological approach chosen by the contributors, the cesura model), (2) highlight what can be gained from such a revised understanding of "chunking" in talk-in-interaction by referring to previous work with this model as well as the findings of the contributions to this special issue, and (3) indicate further directions such work could take starting from papers in this special issue. We hope to induce a fruitful exchange on the phenomena discussed, across methodological divides.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kuettner2018,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {Investigating Inferences in Sequences of Action},
  series = {Open Linguistics},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Open Linguistics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2300-9969},
  doi       = {10.1515/opli-2018-0006},
  pages     = {101 -- 126},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that's right to implicitly claim "just-now" recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant's production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants' understanding of oh that's right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semanticpragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Kuettner2019,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {At the intersection of stance-management and repair},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44348},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-443485},
  pages     = {115 -- 156},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker's insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kuettner2019,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {At the intersection of stance-management and repair},
  series = {Gespr{\"a}chsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion},
  journal   = {Gespr{\"a}chsforschung : Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion},
  number    = {20},
  publisher = {Verlag f{\"u}r Gespr{\"a}chsforschung},
  address   = {Gleizendorf bei N{\"u}rnberg},
  issn      = {1617-1837},
  pages     = {115 -- 156},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Dieser Beitrag widmet sich der Verwendung eines spezifischen Typs meta-sprachlicher {\"A}ußerungen. Er untersucht wie SprecherInnen des Englischen meta-pragmatische Behauptungen, zuvor das „Gleiche" kommuniziert (‚gesagt' oder ‚gemeint') zu haben wie ihr Gespr{\"a}chspartner, verwenden. Mit Hilfe detaillierter sequenzieller Analysen wird gezeigt, dass diese Behauptungen oft verwendet werden, um disaffiliative Erwiderungen zu entkr{\"a}ften und somit aufkeimende Meinungsverschiedenheiten aufzul{\"o}sen. Neben der Beschreibung der Mechanismen, die dieser Praktik zu Grunde liegen, werden die verschiedenen verbalen, para- und non-verbalen Ressourcen, die bei der Verwendung dieser Praktik (teils variabel) zum Einsatz ge-bracht werden, inventarisiert. Abschließend wird das Verh{\"a}ltnis dieser Praktik zu anderen Gespr{\"a}chspraktiken diskutiert. Da sie grundlegend darauf fußt, dass ein Missverst{\"a}ndnis auf Seiten des Gegen{\"u}bers insinuiert wird, kann sie an der Schnittstelle von Praktiken zum Management von Einstellungen bzw. Haltungen und Reparaturen verortet werden.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kupetz2014,
  author    = {Kupetz, Maxi},
  title     = {Empathy displays as interactional achievements-Multimodal and sequential aspects},
  series = {Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0378-2166},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006},
  pages     = {4 -- 34},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Weinbach2014,
  author    = {Weinbach, Christine},
  title     = {Moral person categories as a transformational mechanism in political service relations: The example of job centre interaction},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {43},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Lucius \& Lucius},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0340-1804},
  pages     = {150 -- 166},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The present article shows, in a case study, how basic problems of interactions in Job Centres are shaped by expectations deriving from the social levels of organization and interaction and can be solved by a specific modification of the person category of the good customer. This client is categorized as a customer with the will to be willing: By wanting what the Job Center staff wants him or her to want and by accommodating to the contingent goals of political discourse and public administration as much as possible she or he enables the interaction to transform organizational and interactional expectations into addressable expectations. In this way he or she constitutes a vital link within the managerial guidance system of a modern labor administration.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Koehler2007,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {K{\"o}hler, Anke},
  title     = {Repair in the context of theater rehearsals : a conversation analytic approach},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-54075},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {The thesis deals mainly with the following four points: - similarities and differences between repair in everyday talk-in-interaction and repair in the context of theater rehearsals - asymmetrical relationship between director, prompter, and actors - impact of the asymmetrical relationship between director and actors on their specific repair behavior - change of the relative amount of self-repair and other-repair over the time span of the rehearsal period. The analyses are undertaken according to the conversation analytic approach. Furthermore, there is an quantitative analysis of the repair development over time.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Kupetz2009,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Kupetz, Maxi},
  title     = {Die multimodale Darstellung von Mitleid in Erz{\"a}hlaktivit{\"a}ten},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-37947},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {In dieser konversationsanalytisch-interaktionslinguistischen Arbeit werden verbale, para-verbale und nonverbale Ressourcen zur Darstellung des Affekts Mitleid im Rahmen der sozialen Aktivit{\"a}t Erz{\"a}hlung untersucht. Grundlage der Analyse sind Video- und Audiodaten deutscher Gespr{\"a}che. Es wird einerseits aufgezeigt, welche Ressourcen von Erz{\"a}hlerinnen eingesetzt werden, um affektive Reaktionen relevant zu machen (z.B. Blickverhalten, Augenbrauenbewegungen, rhetorische Mittel), andererseits wird beschrieben, welche spezifischen Ressourcen zur Darstellung von Mitleid eingesetzt werden (z.B. Interjektionen mit spezifischen Tonh{\"o}henverl{\"a}ufen, „arme/r/s + S"-Konstruktionen, Handbewegungen). Es wird zudem demonstriert, dass es sich bei der Darstellung von Mitleid um ein interaktiv hergestelltes, soziales Ph{\"a}nomen handelt. Anhand des metakommunikativen Wissens der Sprecher, das sprachlich relevant gemacht wird und somit f{\"u}r die Analyse zug{\"a}nglich ist, kann eine grundlegende soziale Regel zur Darstellung von Mitleid herausgearbeitet werden: Voraussetzung f{\"u}r Mitleid bzw. seine Darstellung ist eine spezifische Qualit{\"a}t der sozialen Beziehung zu der ‚consequential figure' (Maynard 1997). Nur wenn diese vorhanden ist bzw. interaktiv hergestellt wird, kann eine Mitleidsdarstellung in einer Erz{\"a}hlung {\"u}ber problematische Themen relevant gemacht werden und der lokalen Herstellung von sozialer N{\"a}he zwischen den Gespr{\"a}chsteilnehmern dienen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Scheerer2007,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Scheerer, Jana},
  title     = {Die Gerichtsshow als kommunikative Gattung : eine konversationsanalytische Untersuchung am Beispiel der Sendungen „Richter Alexander Hold", „Richterin Barbara Salesch" und „Das Strafgericht"},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-14753},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {In Gerichtsshows wie „Richter Alexander Hold", „Richterin Barbara Salesch" und „Das Strafgericht" agieren Laiendarsteller semi-spontan als Teilnehmer einer fiktiven Gerichtsverhandlung. Hier wird also eine kommunikative Gattung aus der {\"o}ffentlichen Kommunikation - die Gerichtsverhandlung - als Folie f{\"u}r eine Unterhaltungssendung genutzt. In dieser Arbeit wird die Gerichtsshow mithilfe des Konzeptes der kommunikativen Gattung beschrieben. Die Darstellung findet auf den verschiedenen Ebenen der kommunikativen Gattung "Binnenebene", "situative Realisierungsebene" und "Außenstruktur" statt. Außerdem wird dem Modell der kommunikativen Gattung als weitere Ebene die "mediale Außenstruktur" hinzugef{\"u}gt, um die Beschreibbarkeit des Mediengespr{\"a}chs "Gerichtsshow" zu verbessern. Die Analyse der Gerichtsshow zeigt, dass hier durch die Beteiligten eine Kontextualisierung als Gerichtsverhandlung aufgebaut wird. Die Teilnehmer m{\"u}ssen jedoch zugleich Aufgaben bew{\"a}ltigen, die denen einer Unterhaltungssendung entsprechen. Eine zentrale Aufgabe der Beteiligten ist daher das st{\"a}ndige Aushandeln zwischen der Produktion der Kontextualisierung als Gerichtsverhandlung einerseits und der Erf{\"u}llung der Anforderungen einer Unterhaltungssendung andererseits. In diesem Aushandlungsprozess entsteht eine gerichtsshowspezifische Darstellung von Kommunikation vor Gericht, die in dieser Arbeit mithilfe von rechtssoziologischen Konzepten wie dem der "Verfahrensgerechtigkeit" in ihrer Bedeutung im Diskurs um Recht und Gerechtigkeit eingeordnet wird. Die Analyse findet anhand von transkribierten Ausschnitten aus den Sendungen „Richter Alexander Hold", „Richterin Barbara Salesch" und „Das Strafgericht" statt.},
  language  = {de}
}