@misc{OlsonKlieglDavidson1983,
  author    = {Olson, Richard K. and Kliegl, Reinhold and Davidson, Brian J.},
  title     = {Eye Movements in Reading Disability},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-39880},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {Contents: I. Introduction II. Word Coding Processes A. Word Recognition B. Orthographic Coding C. Phonological Coding III. Eye Monitor and Reading Task IV. Group Differences V. Dimensions of Individual Differences A. Regressive Fixation Index and Word Recognition B. Regressive Fixation Index and IQ C. Regressive Fixation Index and Saccade Length D. Regressive Fixation Index and Relative Phonological Skill VI. Multiple Regression Models of Individual Differences A. Disabled Readers in the Aloud Condition B. Disabled Readers in the Silent Condition C. Normal Readers in Silent and Aloud Conditions VII. Conclusions},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KlieglOlsonDavidson1983,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Olson, Richard K. and Davidson, Brian J.},
  title     = {On problems of unconfounding perceptual and language processes},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-39890},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {Contents: I. Introduction II. Word Length and Word Frequency III. Preferred and Convenient Viewing Position IV. Influences across Words A. Serial Dependencies B. Lack of Saccadic Resilience V. Conclusion},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{GlassKliegl1983,
  author    = {Glass, Gene V. and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {An apology for research integration in the study of psychotherapy},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-40233},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {Criticisms of the integration of psychotherapy-outcome research performed by Smith, Glass, and Miller (1980) are reviewed and answered. An attempt is made to account for the conflicting points of view in this disagreement in terms of certain issues that have engaged philosophers of science in the 20th century. It is hoped that, in passing, something useful is learned about research of many types on psychotherapy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{OlsonKlieglDavidson1983,
  author    = {Olson, Richard K. and Kliegl, Reinhold and Davidson, Brian J.},
  title     = {Dyslexic and normal readers' eye movements},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41071},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {Dyslexic and normal readers' eye movements were compared while tracking a moving fixation point and in reading. Contrary to previous reports, the dyslexic and normal readers did not differ in their number of saccades, percentage of regressions, or stability of fixations in the tracking task. Thus, defective oculomotor control was not associated with or a causal factor in dyslexia, and the dyslexics' abnormal eye movements in reading must be related to differences in higher cognitive processes. However, individual differences in oculmotor efficiency, independent of reading ability, were found within both the dyslexic and normal groups, and these differences were correlated in reading and tracking tasks.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Krahe1983,
  author    = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {Zum Stand der Diskussion um den "self-serving bias" in der Attributionsforschung},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-45286},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {The 'fact or fiction1 controversy about self-serving attributional biases is discussed under two aspects: a) The lack of a clear conceptual definition of "bias" referring to cognitive models of causal attribution which specify unbiased, rational modes of causal inference; b) The empirical evidence with regard to the decision whether attributional distortions are due to self-protective and self-enhancing motives rather than errors and biases in information processing. It is concluded that progress in self-serving bias research is conditional upon a theoretical clarification and operational definition of self-serving biases explicitly derived from a rational standard of causal inference and based on a motivational analysis of the functions of causal attributions.},
  language  = {de}
}