@article{Grohmann2022,
  author    = {Grohmann, Nils-Hendrik},
  title     = {Tracing the development of the proportionality analysis in relation to forced evictions under the ICESCR},
  series = {Human rights law review},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Human rights law review},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1461-7781},
  doi       = {10.1093/hrlr/ngac025},
  pages     = {1 -- 24},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Since 2013, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights can examine individual communications under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). This opens up the possibility to interpret Covenant provisions in a thorough manner. With regard to forced evictions and the right to housing under Article 11 ICESCR, one can discern a fast-developing approach concerning the proportionality analysis of evictions, entailing the establishment of specific criteria that may guide such analysis. This paper seeks to delineate these developments and will also shed light on possible general trends on the topic of limitations within the Committee's emerging jurisprudence. In doing so, the paper will address if, and how, the developing proportionality analysis under the individual complaints procedure takes into consideration multi-discriminatory dimensions of State measures and how it specifically relates to or incorporates other ICESCR-concepts, such as minimum core obligations or the reasonableness review under Article 8(4) OP ICESCR.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GonzalezHauckHerrmannHettihewaetal.2022,
  author    = {Gonz{\´a}lez Hauck, Su{\´e} and Herrmann, Franziska and Hettihewa, Julian A. and Kraft, Dariush and Milas, Max and Springer, Stephanie and Weckner, Franka},
  title     = {Jurisdiction},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r ausl{\"a}ndisches {\"o}ffentliches Recht und V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  volume    = {82},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r ausl{\"a}ndisches {\"o}ffentliches Recht und V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0044-2348},
  doi       = {10.17104/0044-2348-2022-2-289},
  pages     = {289 -- 298},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannSchabedoth2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Schabedoth, John Alexander},
  title     = {Domestic and international criminal justice},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  number    = {57},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3762},
  doi       = {10.2139/ssrn.4087189},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper consists of two parts: In the first part, some of the challenges with which the Internationaal Criminal Court is currently confronted are being presented. First of all, the article will describe the current state of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statue. Afterwards, the article analyses the Court's efforts to deal with cases against third-country nationals and the challenges it is facing in that regard. In addition, the Court's case law will be analyzed in order to determine an increasing 'emancipation' of the case law of the International Criminal Court from international humanitarian law. The second part of the paper will briefly discuss the role of domestic international criminal law and domestic courts in the further development and enforcement of international criminal law. As an example of the role that domestic courts may have in clarifying classic issues in international law, the judgment of the German Supreme Court of January 28, 2021 (3 StR 564/19), which deals with the status of costumary international law on functional immunity of State officials before domestic courts, shall be assessed.},
  language  = {en}
}