@article{NiproschkeOertelSchubarthetal.2016,
  author    = {Niproschke, Saskia and Oertel, Lars and Schubarth, Wilfried and Ulbricht, Juliane and Bilz, Ludwig},
  title     = {More or Less Violence in Schools? A Replication Study from 1996-2014 in Saxon Schools},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation},
  publisher = {Juventa-Verl.},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1436-1957},
  doi       = {10.3262/ZSE1601078},
  pages     = {78 -- 96},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Der verbreiteten Annahme einer st{\"a}ndigen Gewaltzunahme an Schulen stehen bisher nur wenige Studien im Zeitvergleich gegen{\"u}ber. Der vorliegende Beitrag will diese L{\"u}cke schließen, indem er Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Replikationsstudie vorstellt und damit die Frage beantwortet, ob die Gewalt an Schulen im Vergleich zur Mitte der 1990er Jahre zu- oder abgenommen hat. Anhand einer repr{\"a}sentativen s{\"a}chsischen Stichprobe zeigt sich, dass im Jahr 2014 im Vergleich zu 1996 {\"u}ber weniger Gewalt an Schulen berichtet wird. Dies betrifft die Gewalt unter Sch{\"u} ler(inne)n und die Gewalt gegen Lehrkr{\"a}fte. Parallel hat die Interventionsbereitschaft unter der Lehrer- und Sch{\"u}lerschaft zugenommen. Zugleich macht die Studie auf differente Entwicklungstrends zwischen den Sch{\"u}lergruppen aufmerksam. Trotz eines insgesamt niedrigen Gewaltniveaus im Vergleich zur Mitte der 1990er Jahre legen die Befunde den Schluss nahe, bei den Pr{\"a}ventionsbem{\"u}hungen nicht nachzulassen. Veryfew studies have investigated the widely held assumption that violence in schools has constantly increased in recent years. The current study aims to fill this gap by presenting results of a recent replication study in Germany, as well as answering the question as to whether violence in schools increased or decreased in comparison with the mid-1990s. Based on a representative sample of Saxon students, this study shows that less violence was reported in schools in 2014 compared to 1996. This relates to both violence among students and their violent actions against teachers. Moreover, the willingness of teachers and students to intervene has increased. At the same time, this study draws attention to developmental trends between groups of students. Despite a general low level of violence in schools compared to the mid-1990s, the findings suggest that prevention efforts must be continued.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{ChaykovskaHeunischvonEinemetal.2016,
  author    = {Chaykovska, Lyubov and Heunisch, Fabian and von Einem, Gina and Alter, Markus L. and Hocher, Carl-Friedrich and Tsuprykov, Oleg and Dschietzig, Thomas and Kretschmer, Axel and Hocher, Berthold},
  title     = {Urinary vitamin D binding protein and KIM-1 are potent new biomarkers of major adverse renal events in patients undergoing coronary angiography},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {558},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-41192},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-411928},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Vitamin-D-binding protein (VDBP) is a low molecular weight protein that is filtered through the glomerulus as a 25-(OH) vitamin D 3/VDBP complex. In the normal kidney VDBP is reabsorbed and catabolized by proximal tubule epithelial cells reducing the urinary excretion to trace amounts. Acute tubular injury is expected to result in urinary VDBP loss. The purpose of our study was to explore the potential role of urinary VDBP as a biomarker of an acute renal damage. Method We included 314 patients with diabetes mellitus or mild renal impairment undergoing coronary angiography and collected blood and urine before and 24 hours after the CM application. Patients were followed for 90 days for the composite endpoint major adverse renal events (MARE: need for dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine after 90 days, unplanned emergency rehospitalization or death). Results Increased urine VDBP concentration 24 hours after contrast media exposure was predictive for dialysis need (no dialysis: 113.06 +/- 299.61ng/ml, n = 303; need for dialysis: 613.07 +/- 700.45 ng/ml, n = 11, Mean +/- SD, p < 0.001), death (no death during follow-up: 121.41 +/- 324.45 ng/ml, n = 306; death during follow-up: 522.01 +/- 521.86 ng/ml, n = 8; Mean +/- SD, p < 0.003) and MARE (no MARE: 112.08 +/- 302.00ng/ml, n = 298; MARE: 506.16 +/- 624.61 ng/ml, n = 16, Mean +/- SD, p < 0.001) during the follow-up of 90 days after contrast media exposure. Correction of urine VDBP concentrations for creatinine excretion confirmed its predictive value and was consistent with increased levels of urinary Kidney Injury Molecule1 (KIM-1) and baseline plasma creatinine in patients with above mentioned complications. The impact of urinary VDBP and KIM-1 on MARE was independent of known CIN risk factors such as anemia, preexisting renal failure, preexisting heart failure, and diabetes. Conclusions Urinary VDBP is a promising novel biomarker of major contrast induced nephropathy-associated events 90 days after contrast media exposure.},
  language  = {en}
}