@article{HettingerLazaridesRetelsdorf2022,
  author    = {Hettinger, Katharina and Lazarides, Rebecca and Retelsdorf, Jan},
  title     = {Interindividuell unterschiedliche Ver{\"a}nderungen der Lesemotivation},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer Vieweg-Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-022-01076-1},
  pages     = {353 -- 376},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Reading motivation is highly significant for students' reading achievement and varies interindividual. However, only few studies investigate changes in reading motivation patterns considering student gender, reading achievement and teaching behavior. These results would allow adaptive teaching. In this longitudinal study we aim to close this research gap by examining students' valuing of reading and reading self-concept using data from N = 1313 German fifth- and sixth-grade students (50.0\% girls). Results of latent profile analyses identified three motivational profiles: 'Low intrinsic value', 'Moderate reading motivation' and 'High reading motivation'. Highly supportive teaching-as perceived by students-in Grade 5 was significantly associated with a lower probability to change in the 'Low intrinsic value profile' instead into the 'High reading motivation profile'. Girls and high achievers in reading changed less likely into the 'Moderate reading motivation profile' than into the 'High reading motivation profile'. Implications for teaching are discussed.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HenschelSchaffner2014,
  author    = {Henschel, Sofie and Schaffner, Ellen},
  title     = {Differential relationships between components of reading motivation and comprehension of literary and expository texts},
  series = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Reinhardt},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0342-183X},
  doi       = {10.2378/peu2014.art10d},
  pages     = {112 -- 126},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Studies on habitual reading motivation (RM) indicate positive relations between intrinsic RM and text comprehension. Extrinsic RM in contrast is not or negatively correlated with text comprehension. However, it is unknown on which sub-dimensions - in particular of intrinsic RM these relationships are based and whether they apply to the understanding of literary and expository texts equally. Therefore, we examined in a sample of 1500 9th graders whether there are differential relationships between single subdimensions of intrinsic RM (object- vs. experience-related) and extrinsic RM (competition- vs. achievement-related) and comprehension of literary and expository texts. Results indicate that both dimensions of extrinsic RM are negatively (competition-related RM) or not significantly (achievement-related RM) associated with comprehension of literary and expository texts. While object-related RM has equally strong positive effects on both types of text comprehension, experience-related RM is exclusively associated with literary, but not with expository text comprehension.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchiefeleSchaffner2013,
  author    = {Schiefele, Ulrich and Schaffner, Ellen},
  title     = {Reading motivation of Sixth-Grade Elementary School Students - results from an interview study},
  series = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  volume    = {60},
  journal   = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Reinhardt},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0342-183X},
  doi       = {10.2378/peu2013.art17d},
  pages     = {214 -- 233},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Based on research by Wigfield and Guthrie (1997), Moller and Bonerad (2007) as well as Schaffner and Schiefele (2007) have developed questionnaires to assess students' reading motivation. The goal of the present study was to examine whether these instruments coincide with students' subjective views of their own reading motivation. In order to clarify this question, we conducted interviews with 26 elementary school students and applied content analysis to examine the interview protocols. Although the results support some of the theoretically postulated components, they suggest that questionnaire measures have neglected some important aspects of reading motivation (e. g., reading to regulate one's feelings, reading to relax). Finally, consequences for the revision of reading motivation questionnaires were discussed.},
  language  = {de}
}