@article{FagesHanghojKhanetal.2019,
  author    = {Fages, Antoine and Hanghoj, Kristian and Khan, Naveed and Gaunitz, Charleen and Seguin-Orlando, Andaine and Leonardi, Michela and Constantz, Christian McCrory and Gamba, Cristina and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S. and Albizuri, Silvia and Alfarhan, Ahmed H. and Allentoft, Morten and Alquraishi, Saleh and Anthony, David and Baimukhanov, Nurbol and Barrett, James H. and Bayarsaikhan, Jamsranjav and Benecke, Norbert and Bernaldez-Sanchez, Eloisa and Berrocal-Rangel, Luis and Biglari, Fereidoun and Boessenkool, Sanne and Boldgiv, Bazartseren and Brem, Gottfried and Brown, Dorcas and Burger, Joachim and Crubezy, Eric and Daugnora, Linas and Davoudi, Hossein and Damgaard, Peter de Barros and de Chorro y de Villa-Ceballos, Maria de los Angeles and Deschler-Erb, Sabine and Detry, Cleia and Dill, Nadine and Oom, Maria do Mar and Dohr, Anna and Ellingvag, Sturla and Erdenebaatar, Diimaajav and Fathi, Homa and Felkel, Sabine and Fernandez-Rodriguez, Carlos and Garcia-Vinas, Esteban and Germonpre, Mietje and Granado, Jose D. and Hallsson, Jon H. and Hemmer, Helmut and Hofreiter, Michael and Kasparov, Aleksei and Khasanov, Mutalib and Khazaeli, Roya and Kosintsev, Pavel and Kristiansen, Kristian and Kubatbek, Tabaldiev and Kuderna, Lukas and Kuznetsov, Pavel and Laleh, Haeedeh and Leonard, Jennifer A. and Lhuillier, Johanna and von Lettow-Vorbeck, Corina Liesau and Logvin, Andrey and Lougas, Lembi and Ludwig, Arne and Luis, Cristina and Arruda, Ana Margarida and Marques-Bonet, Tomas and Silva, Raquel Matoso and Merz, Victor and Mijiddorj, Enkhbayar and Miller, Bryan K. and Monchalov, Oleg and Mohaseb, Fatemeh A. and Morales, Arturo and Nieto-Espinet, Ariadna and Nistelberger, Heidi and Onar, Vedat and Palsdottir, Albina H. and Pitulko, Vladimir and Pitskhelauri, Konstantin and Pruvost, Melanie and Sikanjic, Petra Rajic and Papesa, Anita Rapan and Roslyakova, Natalia and Sardari, Alireza and Sauer, Eberhard and Schafberg, Renate and Scheu, Amelie and Schibler, Jorg and Schlumbaum, Angela and Serrand, Nathalie and Serres-Armero, Aitor and Shapiro, Beth and Seno, Shiva Sheikhi and Shevnina, Irina and Shidrang, Sonia and Southon, John and Star, Bastiaan and Sykes, Naomi and Taheri, Kamal and Taylor, William and Teegen, Wolf-Rudiger and Vukicevic, Tajana Trbojevic and Trixl, Simon and Tumen, Dashzeveg and Undrakhbold, Sainbileg and Usmanova, Emma and Vahdati, Ali and Valenzuela-Lamas, Silvia and Viegas, Catarina and Wallner, Barbara and Weinstock, Jaco and Zaibert, Victor and Clavel, Benoit and Lepetz, Sebastien and Mashkour, Marjan and Helgason, Agnar and Stefansson, Kari and Barrey, Eric and Willerslev, Eske and Outram, Alan K. and Librado, Pablo and Orlando, Ludovic},
  title     = {Tracking five millennia of horse management with extensive ancient genome time series},
  series = {Cell},
  volume    = {177},
  journal   = {Cell},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Cell Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0092-8674},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.049},
  pages     = {1419 -- 1435},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Horse domestication revolutionized warfare and accelerated travel, trade, and the geographic expansion of languages. Here, we present the largest DNA time series for a non-human organism to date, including genome-scale data from 149 ancient animals and 129 ancient genomes (>= 1-fold coverage), 87 of which are new. This extensive dataset allows us to assess the modem legacy of past equestrian civilisations. We find that two extinct horse lineages existed during early domestication, one at the far western (Iberia) and the other at the far eastern range (Siberia) of Eurasia. None of these contributed significantly to modern diversity. We show that the influence of Persian-related horse lineages increased following the Islamic conquests in Europe and Asia. Multiple alleles associated with elite-racing, including at the MSTN "speed gene," only rose in popularity within the last millennium. Finally, the development of modem breeding impacted genetic diversity more dramatically than the previous millennia of human management.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CasasMarceMarmesatSorianoetal.2017,
  author    = {Casas-Marce, Mireia and Marmesat, Elena and Soriano, Laura and Martinez-Cruz, Begona and Lucena-Perez, Maria and Nocete, Francisco and Rodriguez-Hidalgo, Antonio and Canals, Antoni and Nadal, Jordi and Detry, Cleia and Bernaldez-Sanchez, Eloisa and Fernandez-Rodriguez, Carlos and Perez-Ripoll, Manuel and Stiller, Mathias and Hofreiter, Michael and Rodriguez, Alejandro and Revilla, Eloy and Delibes, Miguel and Godoy, Jose A.},
  title     = {Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Genetic Variation in the Iberian Lynx along Its Path to Extinction Reconstructed with Ancient DNA},
  series = {Molecular biology and evolution},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Molecular biology and evolution},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0737-4038},
  doi       = {10.1093/molbev/msx222},
  pages     = {2893 -- 2907},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {There is the tendency to assume that endangered species have been both genetically and demographically healthier in the past, so that any genetic erosion observed today was caused by their recent decline. The Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) suffered a dramatic and continuous decline during the 20th century, and now shows extremely low genome- and species-wide genetic diversity among other signs of genomic erosion. We analyze ancient (N\&\#8201;=\&\#8201;10), historical (N\&\#8201;=\&\#8201;245), and contemporary (N\&\#8201;=\&\#8201;172) samples with microsatellite and mitogenome data to reconstruct the species' demography and investigate patterns of genetic variation across space and time. Iberian lynx populations transitioned from low but significantly higher genetic diversity than today and shallow geographical differentiation millennia ago, through a structured metapopulation with varying levels of diversity during the last centuries, to two extremely genetically depauperate and differentiated remnant populations by 2002. The historical subpopulations show varying extents of genetic drift in relation to their recent size and time in isolation, but these do not predict whether the populations persisted or went finally extinct. In conclusion, current genetic patterns were mainly shaped by genetic drift, supporting the current admixture of the two genetic pools and calling for a comprehensive genetic management of the ongoing conservation program. This study illustrates how a retrospective analysis of demographic and genetic patterns of endangered species can shed light onto their evolutionary history and this, in turn, can inform conservation actions.},
  language  = {en}
}