@article{StroehleBendauAugustinetal.2022,
  author    = {Str{\"o}hle, Andreas and Bendau, Antonia and Augustin, Noah and Esch, Anna Dania and Große, Julia and Kaminski, Jan and Petzold, Moritz Bruno and Plag, Jens and Schmidt, Maike and Sch{\"u}tte, Martina and Strehle, Nicola and Wendt, Nora},
  title     = {Sportpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie},
  series = {Der Nervenarzt : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde ; Mitteilungsblatt der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Neurologie},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Der Nervenarzt : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde ; Mitteilungsblatt der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Neurologie},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  organization    = {Arbeitsgrp Sportpsychiat Psychothe},
  issn      = {0028-2804},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00115-022-01342-x},
  pages     = {742 -- 753},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Sports psychiatry and psychotherapy is a relatively young field and is comprised of two key segments: the special features of the diagnostics and therapy of mental disorders in elite athletes and the use of exercise and sports in the development and treatment of mental disorders. Although all mental disorders can in principle also occur in (elite) athletes, there are additionally sport-specific mental disorders, such as anorexia athletica and other eating disorders, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, misuse of and dependency on performance-enhancing substances (doping) and muscle dysmorphia. Many high-quality clinical trials over the past two decades have been able to demonstrate a therapeutic efficacy of physical activity and sport in the treatment of various mental disorders. All clinicians active in psychiatry and psychotherapy should possess a basic knowledge of sports psychiatry.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KahlertBrand2011,
  author    = {Kahlert, Daniela and Brand, Ralf},
  title     = {Comparing self-report and accelerometry data a contribution to the validation of the MoMo-Physical activity questionnaire for children and adolescents},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sportmedizin : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Sportmedizin und Pr{\"a}vention (Deutscher Sport{\"a}rztebund) e.V. (DGSP) und Weiterbildungsorgan der {\"O}sterreichischen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Sportmedizin und Pr{\"a}vention},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sportmedizin : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Sportmedizin und Pr{\"a}vention (Deutscher Sport{\"a}rztebund) e.V. (DGSP) und Weiterbildungsorgan der {\"O}sterreichischen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Sportmedizin und Pr{\"a}vention},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {WWF-Verl.-Ges.},
  address   = {Greven},
  issn      = {0344-5925},
  pages     = {36 -- +},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {According to the results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) published in 2009, only 5\% to 8\% of the 15-17-year-old adolescents reach the current recommendations on health-enhancing physical activity This result (besides others in the survey) rests on data measured with the 25-item physical activity questionnaire for children and adolescents (MoMo-AFB). The present study compares two different methods of assessing physical activity with the purpose of testing the validity of the MoMo-AFB self-report. First, we measured the physical activity status of 73 15 to 18-year-old pupils (32 boys and 41 girls) over seven days via objective accelerometry (ActiGraph GT1M), then the pupils completed the MoMo-AFB for the same (previous) period. Results show that using the MoMo-AFB leads to higher levels of self-reported physical activity than measuring it with accelerometers. Furthermore, only the MoMo-AFB subscale MVPA (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity), that uses two single items to decide whether the health-enhancing physical activity recommendation is reached or failed, corresponds statistically significantly with the accelerometry data. For all other subscales (e.g. school- or leisure time activity), we found no agreement. Further research, first of all on the measurement quality of the MoMo-AFB but also on the physical (in)activity status of children and adolescents, is needed.},
  language  = {de}
}