@article{WrightWachsHarper2018,
  author    = {Wright, Michelle F. and Wachs, Sebastian and Harper, Bridgette D.},
  title     = {The moderation of empathy in the longitudinal association between witnessing cyberbullying, depression, and anxiety},
  series = {Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Masrykova Univ.},
  address   = {Brno},
  issn      = {1802-7962},
  doi       = {10.5817/CP2018-4-6},
  pages     = {14},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {While the role of and consequences of being a bystander to face-to-face bullying has received some attention in the literature, to date, little is known about the effects of being a bystander to cyberbullying. It is also unknown how empathy might impact the negative consequences associated with being a bystander of cyberbullying. The present study focused on examining the longitudinal association between bystander of cyberbullying depression, and anxiety, and the moderating role of empathy in the relationship between bystander of cyberbullying and subsequent depression and anxiety. There were 1,090 adolescents (M-age = 12.19; 50\% female) from the United States included at Time 1, and they completed questionnaires on empathy, cyberbullying roles (bystander, perpetrator, victim), depression, and anxiety. One year later, at Time 2, 1,067 adolescents (M-age = 13.76; 51\% female) completed questionnaires on depression and anxiety. Results revealed a positive association between bystander of cyberbullying and depression and anxiety. Further, empathy moderated the positive relationship between bystander of cyberbullying and depression, but not for anxiety. Implications for intervention and prevention programs are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{WrightWachsHarper2018,
  author    = {Wright, Michelle F. and Wachs, Sebastian and Harper, Bridgette D.},
  title     = {The moderation of empathy in the longitudinal association between witnessing cyberbullying, depression, and anxiety},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {689},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47050},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-470505},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {While the role of and consequences of being a bystander to face-to-face bullying has received some attention in the literature, to date, little is known about the effects of being a bystander to cyberbullying. It is also unknown how empathy might impact the negative consequences associated with being a bystander of cyberbullying. The present study focused on examining the longitudinal association between bystander of cyberbullying depression, and anxiety, and the moderating role of empathy in the relationship between bystander of cyberbullying and subsequent depression and anxiety. There were 1,090 adolescents (M-age = 12.19; 50\% female) from the United States included at Time 1, and they completed questionnaires on empathy, cyberbullying roles (bystander, perpetrator, victim), depression, and anxiety. One year later, at Time 2, 1,067 adolescents (M-age = 13.76; 51\% female) completed questionnaires on depression and anxiety. Results revealed a positive association between bystander of cyberbullying and depression and anxiety. Further, empathy moderated the positive relationship between bystander of cyberbullying and depression, but not for anxiety. Implications for intervention and prevention programs are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{WrightWachs2018,
  author    = {Wright, Michelle F. and Wachs, Sebastian},
  title     = {Does parental mediation moderate the longitudinal association among bystanders and perpetrators and victims of cyberbullying?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {679},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47230},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-472303},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The purpose of the present study was to examine the moderation of parental mediation in the longitudinal association between being a bystander of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization. Participants were 1067 7th and 8th graders between 12 and 15 years old (51\% female) from six middle schools in predominantly middle-class neighborhoods in the Midwestern United States. Increases in being bystanders of cyberbullying was related positively to restrictive and instructive parental mediation. Restrictive parental mediation was related positively to Time 2 (T2) cyberbullying victimization, while instructive parental mediation was negatively related to T2 cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Restrictive parental mediation was a moderator in the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. Increases in restrictive parental mediation strengthened the positive relationship between these variables. In addition, instructive mediation moderated the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization such that increases in this form of parental mediation strategy weakened the association between bystanders of cyberbullying and T2 cyberbullying victimization. The current findings indicate a need for parents to be aware of how they can impact adolescents' involvement in cyberbullying as bullies and victims. In addition, greater attention should be given to developing parental intervention programs that focus on the role of parents in helping to mitigate adolescents' likelihood of cyberbullying involvement.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WrightHarperWachs2018,
  author    = {Wright, Michelle F. and Harper, Bridgette D. and Wachs, Sebastian},
  title     = {Differences in Adolescents' Response Decision and Evaluation for Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization},
  series = {The Journal of Early Adolescence},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {The Journal of Early Adolescence},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0272-4316},
  doi       = {10.1177/0272431618806052},
  pages     = {1110 -- 1128},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The current study was designed to assess early adolescents' response evaluation and decision for hypothetical peer victimization vignettes. Participants were 336 (59\% girls; X¯¯¯ age = 12.55) seventh and eighth graders from one school in the Midwestern United States. Adolescents read a hypothetical online or offline social situation and answered questions designed to access internal congruence, response evaluation, response efficacy, emotional outcome expectancy, and social outcome expectancy. Girls were more likely to believe that aggressive responses online and offline would lead to positive social and emotional outcome expectancies when compared with boys. Adolescents were more likely to believe that offline and online aggressive responses were legitimate responses to face-to-face victimization, feel that aggressive responses online or offline were easier to execute in response to face-to-face victimization, and that aggressive responses online or offline would lead to positive emotions and better social outcomes.},
  language  = {en}
}