@article{ZimmermannBerdefy2023, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Berdefy, Alina-Camille}, title = {Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit im Kontext des Krieges gegen die Ukraine}, series = {Europ{\"a}ische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift}, volume = {50}, journal = {Europ{\"a}ische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift}, number = {1-8}, publisher = {Engel}, address = {Kehl am Rhein}, issn = {0341-9800}, pages = {40 -- 48}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Angesichts der dramatischen Lage in der Ukraine untersucht der folgende Beitrag, auf welchem Wege, vor welchen v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Gerichten, in welchem Umfang und mit welcher Aussicht auf Erfolg die Ukraine oder einzelne ukrainische Staatsangeh{\"o}rige Sicherheitsschutz vor der russischen Invasion und/oder den im Zusammenhang damit bereits begangenen oder noch bevorstehenden V{\"o}lkerrechtsverst{\"o}ßen Rechtsschutz erlangen k{\"o}nnen. Im Einzelnen handelt es sich hierbei um zwei anh{\"a}ngige Verfahren vor dem Internationalen Gerichtshof, mehrere Staaten- sowie eine große Vielzahl von Individualbeschwerden vor dem Europ{\"a}ischen Gerichtshof f{\"u}r Menschenrechte; ein Verfahren vor dem Internationalen Seegerichtshof; zahlreiche Investitionsverfahren vor internationalen Schiedsgerichten sowie schließlich zwei "Situationen" vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof. Abschließend wird die Option der Schaffung eines ad-hoc-Tribunals f{\"u}r das Verbrechen der Aggression behandelt.}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannBerdefy2023, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Berdefy, Alina-Camille}, title = {Strafverfolgung und Beendigung von Straflosigkeit angesichts des russischen Angriffskriegs gegen die Ukraine}, series = {Ukraine-Krieg und Recht}, volume = {2}, journal = {Ukraine-Krieg und Recht}, number = {4}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, pages = {164 -- 167}, year = {2023}, language = {de} } @incollection{GeissZimmermann2022, author = {Geiß, Robin and Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {VStGB \S 8 Kriegsverbrechen gegen Personen}, series = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch : Bd. 9. Nebenstrafrecht III : Strafvorschriften aus: AufenthG, Freiz{\"u}gG/EU, AsylG, StAG, WaffG, KrWaffG, SprengG, WStG, EGWStG, V{\"o}lkerstrafgesetzbuch}, volume = {9}, booktitle = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch : Bd. 9. Nebenstrafrecht III : Strafvorschriften aus: AufenthG, Freiz{\"u}gG/EU, AsylG, StAG, WaffG, KrWaffG, SprengG, WStG, EGWStG, V{\"o}lkerstrafgesetzbuch}, editor = {Safferling, Christoph}, edition = {4}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74609-3}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @incollection{GeissZimmermann2022, author = {Geiß, Robin and Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {VStGB \S 10 Kriegsverbrechen gegen humanit{\"a}re Operationen und Embleme}, series = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch : Bd. 9. Nebenstrafrecht III : Strafvorschriften aus: AufenthG, Freiz{\"u}gG/EU, AsylG, StAG, WaffG, KrWaffG, SprengG, WStG, EGWStG, V{\"o}lkerstrafgesetzbuch}, volume = {9}, booktitle = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch : Bd. 9. Nebenstrafrecht III : Strafvorschriften aus: AufenthG, Freiz{\"u}gG/EU, AsylG, StAG, WaffG, KrWaffG, SprengG, WStG, EGWStG, V{\"o}lkerstrafgesetzbuch}, editor = {Safferling, Christoph}, edition = {4}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74609-3}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin}, title = {Article 8 Paras. 2(c)-(f) and 3: War crimes committed in an armed conflict not of an international character}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {4}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74384-9}, pages = {837 -- 1048}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannSchabedoth2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Schabedoth, John Alexander}, title = {Domestic and international criminal justice}, series = {KFG working paper series}, journal = {KFG working paper series}, number = {57}, publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2509-3762}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.4087189}, pages = {22}, year = {2022}, abstract = {This paper consists of two parts: In the first part, some of the challenges with which the Internationaal Criminal Court is currently confronted are being presented. First of all, the article will describe the current state of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statue. Afterwards, the article analyses the Court's efforts to deal with cases against third-country nationals and the challenges it is facing in that regard. In addition, the Court's case law will be analyzed in order to determine an increasing 'emancipation' of the case law of the International Criminal Court from international humanitarian law. The second part of the paper will briefly discuss the role of domestic international criminal law and domestic courts in the further development and enforcement of international criminal law. As an example of the role that domestic courts may have in clarifying classic issues in international law, the judgment of the German Supreme Court of January 28, 2021 (3 StR 564/19), which deals with the status of costumary international law on functional immunity of State officials before domestic courts, shall be assessed.}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Internationaler Strafgerichtshof am Scheideweg}, series = {JuristenZeitung}, volume = {77}, journal = {JuristenZeitung}, number = {6}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, issn = {0022-6882}, doi = {10.1628/jz-2022-0083}, pages = {261 -- 266}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Das V{\"o}lkerstrafrecht steht fast zwanzig Jahre nach dem Inkrafttreten des R{\"o}mischen Statuts - der v{\"o}lkervertraglichen Grundlage des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs - angesichts einer inzwischen deutlich ver{\"a}nderten Weltlage an einem Scheideweg. Daher erscheint es geboten, wenn nicht gar zwingend, die Herausforderungen, mit denen sich der Internationale Strafgerichtshof heute konfrontiert sieht, zu analysieren.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {The International Criminal Court's decision on jurisdiction concerning Palestine and the future of the ICC}, series = {Strafrecht und Systemunrecht : Festschrift f{\"u}r Gerhard Werle zum 70. Geburtstag}, booktitle = {Strafrecht und Systemunrecht : Festschrift f{\"u}r Gerhard Werle zum 70. Geburtstag}, editor = {Jeßberger, Florian and Burghardt, Boris and Vormbaum, Moritz}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, isbn = {978-3-16-161046-2}, doi = {10.1628/978-3-16-161046-2}, pages = {451 -- 460}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin}, title = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xvi): Pillage}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {Fourth edition}, publisher = {C.H. Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74384-9}, pages = {539 -- 554}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa}, title = {Article 15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral)}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {Fourth}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-77926-8}, doi = {10.17104/9783406779268-927}, pages = {927 -- 932}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 15bis. Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referral, proprio motu)}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {Fourth}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-77926-8}, doi = {10.17104/9783406779268-899}, pages = {899 -- 926}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa}, title = {Article 8bis Crime of aggression}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {Fourth}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-77926-8}, doi = {10.17104/9783406779268-686}, pages = {686 -- 726}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin}, title = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(x): Prohibition of physical mutilation}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {4}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74384-9}, pages = {419 -- 436}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin}, title = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xiii): Prohibited destruction}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {4}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74384-9}, pages = {474 -- 503}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 5 Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {Fourth}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-74384-9}, pages = {107 -- 116}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2022, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 124 Transitional provision}, series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court}, editor = {Ambos, Kai}, edition = {Fourth}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-77926-8}, pages = {2905 -- 2914}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @incollection{WeissZimmermann2022, author = {Weiß, Norman and Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Remarks on the relationship between international human rights law and international humanitarian law}, series = {Human rights and international humanitarian law : challenges ahead}, booktitle = {Human rights and international humanitarian law : challenges ahead}, editor = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Weiß, Norman}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {978-1-83910-826-6}, doi = {10.4337/9781839108273.00006}, pages = {1 -- 10}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Back in 1949, and thus only one year after the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the four Geneva Conventions were adopted, providing a strong signal for a new world order created after 1945 with the United Nations at their centre and combining as their goals both the maintenance of peace and security and the protection of human rights, but also recognising, realistically, that succeeding generations had so far not yet been saved from the scourge of war. Hence, the continued need for rules governing, and limiting, the means and methods of warfare once an armed conflict has erupted. At the same time, the international community has unfortunately not been able so far to fully safeguard individual human rights, its efforts to that effect and the continuous development of international human rights law over the years notwithstanding.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2021, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Would the world be a better place if one were to adopt a European approach to state immunity?}, series = {Remedies against immunity?}, volume = {297}, booktitle = {Remedies against immunity?}, editor = {Volpe, Valentina and Peters, Anne and Battini, Stefano}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin ; Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-662-62303-9}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-62304-6_12}, pages = {219 -- 233}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This chapter argues not only that there is no European Sonderweg (or 'special way') when it comes to the law of state immunity but that there ought not to be one. Debates within The Hague Conference on Private International Law in the late 1990s and those leading to the adoption of the 2002 UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States, as well as the development of the EU Brussels Regulation on Jurisdiction and Enforcement, as amended in 2015, all demonstrate that state immunity was not meant to be limited by such treaties but 'safeguarded'. Likewise, there is no proof that regional European customary law limits state immunity when it comes to ius cogens violations, as Italy and (partly) Greece are the only European states denying state immunity in such cases while the European Court of Human Rights has, time and again, upheld a broad concept of state immunity. It therefore seems unlikely that in the foreseeable future a specific European customary law norm on state immunity will develop, especially given the lack of participation in such practice by those states most concerned by the matter, including Germany. This chapter considers the possible legal implications of the jurisprudence of the Italian Constitutional Court for European military operations (if such operations went beyond peacekeeping). These implications would mainly depend on the question of attribution: if one where to assume that acts undertaken within the framework of military operations led by the EU were to be, at least also, attributable to the troop-contributing member states, the respective troop-contributing state would be entitled to enjoy state immunity exactly to the same degree as in any kind of unilateral military operations. Additionally, some possible perspectives beyond Sentenza 238/2014 are examined, in particular concerning the redress awarded by domestic courts 'as long as' neither the German nor the international system grant equivalent protection to the victims of serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during World War II. In the author's opinion, strengthening the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals, bringing interstate cases for damages before the International Court of Justice, as well as providing for claims commissions where individual compensation might be sought for violations of international humanitarian law would be more useful and appropriate mechanisms than denying state immunity.}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannJauer2021, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora}, title = {Legal shades of grey?}, series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts}, volume = {59}, journal = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts}, number = {3}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, issn = {0003-892X}, doi = {10.1628/avr-2021-0016}, pages = {278 -- 299}, year = {2021}, abstract = {As part of the current process of de-formalization in international law, States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to such secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with, and interpretation in line with, other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannJauer2021, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora}, title = {Possible indirect legal effects under international law of non-legally binding instruments}, series = {KFG working paper series}, volume = {48}, journal = {KFG working paper series}, publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2509-3770}, pages = {24}, year = {2021}, abstract = {As part of the current overall process of de-formalization in international law States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with and interpretation in line with other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannEiken2021, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Eiken, Jan}, title = {Volle Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t?}, series = {Zwei plus Vier : die internationale Gr{\"u}ndungsgeschichte der Berliner Republik}, booktitle = {Zwei plus Vier : die internationale Gr{\"u}ndungsgeschichte der Berliner Republik}, editor = {Geiger, Tim and Lillteicher, J{\"u}rgen and Wentker, Hermann}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-072801-9}, doi = {10.1515/9783110728019-007}, pages = {103 -- 122}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Nach Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 1 des Vertrages zur abschließenden Regelung in Bezug aufDeutschland vom 12. September 1990 (Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag)1beendeten die Fran-z{\"o}sische Republik, die Union der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken, das VereinigteK{\"o}nigreich Großbritannien und Nordirland und die Vereinigten Staaten von Ameri-ka„ihre Rechte und Verantwortlichkeiten in Bezug auf Berlin und Deutschland alsGanzes". Dies hatte, wie in dessen Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 2 ausdr{\"u}cklich niedergelegt, zurFolge, dass„die entsprechenden, damit zusammenh{\"a}ngenden vierseitigen Verein-barungen, Beschl{\"u}sse und Praktiken beendet und alle entsprechenden Einrichtun-gen der vier M{\"a}chte aufgel{\"o}st"wurden.2Art. 7 Abs. 2 Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag stelltdemgem{\"a}ß fest, dass das vereinte Deutschland volle Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t {\"u}ber seine inne-ren und {\"a}ußeren Angelegenheiten erhalten habe. Nach dem Wortlaut des Vertrageshaben die Alliierten damit jegliche Rechte in Bezug auf Deutschland abgegeben,rechtliche Auswirkungen der Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch bis in dieheutige Zeit scheinen danach zun{\"a}chst ausgeschlossen.In dem folgenden Beitrag soll diese aus heutiger Sicht selbstverst{\"a}ndlich er-scheinende Hypothese kritisch hinterfragt und der Frage nachgegangen werden, obund inwieweit die Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch immer rechtliche Fol-gen zeitigt. Hierbei soll insbesondere auf Fragen der Fortgeltung alliierten Rechts,Eigentumsfragen sowie auf Fragen der Nachfolge in v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Vertr{\"a}geneingegangen werden.}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannHerrmann2021, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska}, title = {70 Jahre Genfer Fl{\"u}chtlingskonvention}, series = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht}, journal = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht}, number = {6}, publisher = {Luchterhand}, address = {K{\"o}ln ; Neuwied}, issn = {0174-2108}, pages = {221 -- 227}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannWeiss2020, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Weiß, Norman}, title = {V{\"o}lker- und verfassungsrechtliche Parameter eines deutschen Lieferkettengesetzes}, series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts}, volume = {58}, journal = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts}, number = {4}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, issn = {0003-892X}, doi = {10.1628/avr-2020-0028}, pages = {424 -- 463}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Currently a political debate is ongoing in Germany as to whether Germany should, following the example of several other European countries such as France and the Netherlands, adopt a Supply Chain Act (Lieferkettengesetz). If adopted, the act in question would impose due diligence obligations on German corporations to prevent human rights violations taking place in their respective global supply chains. It is against this background that the article examines the preconditions that must be met in order for such act to be eventually compatible with both, German constitutional and international law. The authors further deal with the question whether Germany might even be obliged under international, as well as under German constitutional law, to enact such a supply chain law in order to protect the human rights of workers employed by companies forming part of the global supply chains of German companies. As far as German constitutional law is concerned the article notably deals with the question whether it is the Federal parliament that may adopt such a law also taking into account the competencies of the European Union in the field, and what are the requirements of legal specificity and proportionality in order for the draft law to stand constitutional scrutiny. The authors further offer detailed suggestions how corporate due diligence standards might be best provided for in the envisaged law and propose a risk analysis approach that varies not only according to specific countries and sector-specific characteristics, but that by the same token also takes into account the ability of the respective German company to exercise an appropriate due diligence standard when it comes to human rigths issues arising within the framewok of their supply chain. As far as the substantive human rights standards are concerned that should serve as benchmarks for the envisaged Supply Chain Act the authors propose to rely on, and refer to, those instruments such as the ICCPR and the CESCR, as well as the ILO treaties containing core labour standards, that enjoy almost universal acceptance and reflect customary international law.}, language = {de} } @article{GunnarsonWeissZimmermann2019, author = {Gunnarson, Logi and Weiß, Norman and Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen - Fragen und m{\"o}gliche Antworten nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte}, series = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen : eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte}, journal = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen : eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-3761-1}, pages = {7 -- 14}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannBoos2018, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Boos, Felix}, title = {Bringing States to Justice for Crimes against Humanity}, series = {Journal of international criminal justice}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of international criminal justice}, number = {4}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1478-1387}, doi = {10.1093/jicj/mqy053}, pages = {835 -- 855}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Draft Article 15 of the International Law Commission's project on crimes against humanity — dealing with the settlement of disputes arising from a proposed convention — attempts to strike a balance between state autonomy and robust judicial supervision. It largely follows Article 22 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which renders the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) conditional upon prior negotiations. Hence, the substance of the clause can be interpreted in light of the recent case law of the ICJ, especially in the case Georgia v. Russia. In addition, this contribution discusses several issues regarding the scope ratione temporis of the compromissory clause. It advances several proposals to improve the current draft, addressing its relationship with state responsibility — an explicit reference to which is currently missing — as well as the relationship between the ICJ and a possible treaty body. It also proposes to recalibrate the interplay of the requirement of prior negotiations with, respectively, the possibility of seizing a future treaty body and the indication of provisional measures by the ICJ.}, language = {en} } @article{UlfsteinZimmermann2018, author = {Ulfstein, Geir and Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Certiorari through the Back Door?}, series = {The Law \& Practice of International Courts and Tribunals}, volume = {17}, journal = {The Law \& Practice of International Courts and Tribunals}, number = {2}, publisher = {Brill}, address = {Leiden}, issn = {1569-1853}, doi = {10.1163/15718034-12341381}, pages = {289 -- 308}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In its Burmych and Others v. Ukraine judgment of October 2017 the European Court of Human Rights dismissed more than 12,000 applications due to the fact that they were not only repetitive in nature, but also mutatis mutandis identical to applications covered by a previous pilot judgment rendered against Ukraine. This raises fundamental issues as to the role of the Court within the human rights protection system established by the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as those concerning the interrelationship between the Court and the Committee of Ministers.}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2017, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Humanitarian Assistance and the Security Council}, series = {Israel Law Review}, volume = {50}, journal = {Israel Law Review}, number = {1}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {0021-2237}, doi = {doi.org/10.1017/S0021223716000315}, pages = {3 -- 23}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Over the years, the Security Council has on several occasions dealt with humanitarian assistance issues. However, it is Security Council Resolution 2165(2014), related to the situation in Syria, that has brought the role of the Security Council to the forefront of the debate. It is against this background that the article discusses the legal issues arising from Security Council action facilitating humanitarian assistance to be delivered in situations of non-international armed conflict. Following a brief survey of relevant practice of the Security Council related to humanitarian assistance, the article considers the relevance, if any, of Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) to humanitarian assistance to be delivered in such situations. It then moves on to analyse whether a rejection by the territorial state of humanitarian aid to be delivered by third parties may amount to a situation under Article 39 of the UN Charter. It then considers in detail whether (at least implicitly) Resolution 2165 has been adopted under Chapter VII and, if this is not the case, whether it can be still considered to be legally binding. The article finally considers what impact the adoption of Security Council Resolution 2165 might have on the interpretation of otherwise applicable rules of international humanitarian law and, in particular, the right of third parties to provide humanitarian assistance in a situation of a non-international armed conflict in spite of the absence of consent by the territorial state, and the obligations that members of the Security Council, permanent and non-permanent, have under Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions when faced with a draft resolution providing for the delivery of humanitarian assistance, notwithstanding the absence of consent by the territorial state.}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2017, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin}, title = {The International Committee of the Red Cross: A Unique Actor in the Field of International Humanitarian Law Creation and Progressive Development}, series = {Humanizing the Laws of War}, booktitle = {Humanizing the Laws of War}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {978-1-107-17135-0}, doi = {10.1017/9781316759967.009}, pages = {215 -- 255}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG - ein verfassungsrechtliches Auslaufmodell}, series = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung}, volume = {3}, journal = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {0029-859X}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Zur Wiedergutmachung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts garantiert Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG Abk{\"o}mmlingen von in diskriminierender Weise ausgeb{\"u}rgerten Deutschen die deutsche Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit. Dadurch soll der Zustand wiederhergestellt werden, der ohne die Ausb{\"u}rgerung bestehen w{\"u}rde. Daher wird insoweit regelm{\"a}ßig auf das geltende Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht abgestellt. \S 4 Abs. 4 StAG hat im Jahr 2000 eine Beschr{\"a}nkung der Weitergabe der deutschen Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit f{\"u}r im Ausland geborene Kinder deutscher Staatsangeh{\"o}riger eingef{\"u}hrt, die selbst bereits im Ausland geboren wurden. Dadurch wird m{\"o}glicherweise der Anwendungsbereich des Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG dauerhaft signifikant eingeschr{\"a}nkt; unter Umst{\"a}nden wird die Norm gar obsolet. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird das Spannungsverh{\"a}ltnis zwischen der uneingeschr{\"a}nkten Anwendung des \S 4 Abs. 4 StAG mit dem verfassungsrechtlich verb{\"u}rgerten Recht auf Wiedereinb{\"u}rgerung von Kindern zu Unrecht ausgeb{\"u}rgerter Deutscher er{\"o}rtert.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Kommentierung des Art. 116 GG}, series = {Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz}, booktitle = {Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz}, publisher = {Erich Schmidt Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {3-503-05911-3}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin}, title = {Article 8, VI, Article 8 para. 2 (f): scope of application of article 8 para. 2 (e)}, series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-64854-0}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {La Convention de Vienne sur la succession d'Etats en mati{\`e}re de trait{\´e}s codification r{\´e}ussie ou {\´e}chou{\´e}e?}, series = {La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d'Etats en mati{\`e}re de trait{\´e}s: Commentarie article par article et etudes thematiques ; Volume 1}, booktitle = {La Convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d'Etats en mati{\`e}re de trait{\´e}s: Commentarie article par article et etudes thematiques ; Volume 1}, publisher = {Bruylant}, address = {Bruxelles}, isbn = {978-2-8027-4626-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {1547 -- 1580}, year = {2016}, abstract = {La Convention de Vienne de 1978 traite d'un probl{\`e}me intemporel dans la vie internationale des {\´E}tats, {\`a} savoir leurs mutations territoriales. Il s'agit l{\`a} d'une r{\´e}alit{\´e} internationale qui survit au ph{\´e}nom{\`e}ne de la d{\´e}colonisation, mutation territoriale hautement typ{\´e}e et d{\´e}limit{\´e}e historiquement. Les exemples sont innombrables. L'on peut mentionner la r{\´e}unification de l'Allemagne, l'{\´e}clatement de l'Union sovi{\´e}tique, le d{\´e}membrement de la Yougoslavie, la s{\´e}paration entre la Tch{\´e}quie et la Slovaquie, la s{\´e}cession de l'Erythr{\´e}e de l'Ethiopie, la s{\´e}paration du Timor oriental de l'Indon{\´e}sie, la s{\´e}cession du Pakistan oriental (Bangladesh) du Pakistan. La pratique r{\´e}cente, relative au Kosovo notamment, qui a d{\´e}clar{\´e} son ind{\´e}pendance le 17 f{\´e}vrier 2008, met en exergue l'actualit{\´e} juridique du sujet. Des cas de succession d'{\´E}tats dans un futur proche ou lointain ne sont donc pas {\`a} exclure. Les r{\´e}gions s{\´e}cessionnistes et les pulsions s{\´e}paratistes sont nombreuses, m{\^e}me si tr{\`e}s g{\´e}n{\´e}ralement non reconnues par la communaut{\´e} internationale. Pourtant, la succession d'{\´E}tats n'est toujours pas dot{\´e}e d'un r{\´e}gime juridique coh{\´e}rent complet. Il convient d{\`e}s lors de s'int{\´e}resser {\`a} cette lacune juridique en partant du trait{\´e}-clef en la mati{\`e}re qu'est la Convention de 1978. Un commentaire exhaustif, article par article, de cette Convention se r{\´e}v{\`e}le donc {\^e}tre n{\´e}cessaire. Cet ouvrage contient une analyse serr{\´e}e des apports et des lacunes de cette Convention {\`a} la lumi{\`e}re des travaux pr{\´e}paratoires ainsi que de la pratique r{\´e}cente. Il permet ainsi d'identifier les {\´e}l{\´e}ments de codification de la Convention de Vienne de 1978, mais aussi de voir en quoi celle-ci a pu donner naissance {\`a} des principes et r{\`e}gles coutumi{\`e}res en la mati{\`e}re. Il a pour ambition de remettre au go{\^u}t du jour cette Convention et d'offrir aux chercheurs int{\´e}ress{\´e}s, mais {\´e}galement aux {\´E}tats et sujets concern{\´e}s et {\`a} la communaut{\´e} internationale une vue d'ensemble d{\´e}taill{\´e}e, analytique et syst{\´e}matique du droit actuel en mati{\`e}re de succession d'{\´E}tats et de d{\´e}couvrir ainsi les {\´e}l{\´e}ments de continuit{\´e} et de rupture qui la caract{\´e}risent.}, language = {fr} } @incollection{ZimmermannFreiburg2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg, Elisa}, title = {Article 15bis: Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referal, proprio motu)}, series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary}, booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary}, editor = {Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai}, edition = {3. Aufl}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-64854-0}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {741 -- 764}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannFreiburg2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg, Elisa}, title = {Article 8bis: Crime of aggression}, series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary}, booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary}, editor = {Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai}, edition = {3. Aufl.}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-64854-0}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {580 -- 618}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2016, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 5: Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court}, series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary}, booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary}, edition = {3. Aufl.}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-64854-0}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {111 -- 126}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 208 (Beitrag der Union; Ziel)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {352 -- 376}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 210 (Koordinierung)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {396 -- 397}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 198 (Ziele der Assoziierung)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, pages = {244 -- 247}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 8bis: Crime of Aggression}, series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court}, booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court}, edition = {3. Aufl.}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, pages = {580 -- 618}, year = {2015}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: Developing International Law Without Solving the Conflict}, series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts}, volume = {53}, journal = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts}, number = {2}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, doi = {10.1628/000389215X14412717564749}, pages = {149 -- 166}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The article analyses whether the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has served as a catalyst for the development of international law, as well as whether international law has been instrumental in attempting to find solutions for the said conflict. In several ways, this conflict has made a significant contribution to understanding and interpreting the UN Charter. It also brought along important developments about the role of third parties, both under the Geneva Conventions and under the law of state responsibility, which provides for an obligation of not recognizing as legal, or not rendering aid or assistance to situations caused by serious violations of jus cogens. International judicial institutions (and also domestic ones) play a rather limited role in this respect, due both to a lack of courage to address fundamental questions, and/or a disregard of the outcome of the proceedings by at least one of the parties to the conflict. Other reasons are Israel's reluctance of accepting the jurisdiction of either the ICJ or the ICC, and its view on the non-applicability of human rights treaties outside of its territory, as well as Palestine's uncertain status in the international community limiting its access to international courts. However, the ICJ's 2004 (formally non-binding) advisory opinion on the Israeli Wall provided answers to some of the most fundamental questions related to the conflict, unfortunately without having any immediate impact on the situation on the ground. Given Palestine's accession to the Rome Statute in early 2015, time has yet to show which role in the process will be played by the ICC. Other issues arising from the conflict, and examined by this article, are that of (Palestinian) statehood, going beyond the traditional concept of statehood and including the consequences of the jus cogens-character of the right of self-determination, as well as questions of treaty succession and succession in matters of State responsibility with regard to acts committed by the PLO.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 209 (Mehrjahres- und thematische Programme; Vertragsschlusskompetenz; Rolle der EIB)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {377 -- 395}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 202 (Regelung der Freiz{\"u}gigkeit der Arbeitskr{\"a}fte)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {255 -- 255}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 200 (Verbot von Z{\"o}llen/Ausnahmen)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {250 -- 253}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 211 (Internationale Zusammenarbeit)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {398 -- 399}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 203 (Durchf{\"u}hrungsgesetzgebung)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {256 -- 259}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 204 (Anwendung auf Gr{\"o}nland)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {260 -- 266}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 199 (Zwecke der Assoziierung)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {248 -- 249}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 198 (Ziele der Assoziierung)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {244 -- 247}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{Zimmermann2015, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Artikel 212 (Grunds{\"a}tze der Zusammenarbeit mit Nichtentwicklungsl{\"a}ndern)}, series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, volume = {Bd. 4}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC}, editor = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin}, edition = {7. Aufl.}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6019-3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {399 -- 403}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannSener2014, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sener, Meltem}, title = {Chemical weapons and the international criminal court}, series = {American journal of international law}, volume = {108}, journal = {American journal of international law}, number = {3}, publisher = {American Society of International Law}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0002-9300}, doi = {10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.3.0436}, pages = {436 -- 448}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2014, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Koalition locuta. Causa finita?}, series = {Die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung : D{\"O}V ; Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliches Recht und Verwaltungswissenschaft}, journal = {Die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung : D{\"O}V ; Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliches Recht und Verwaltungswissenschaft}, number = {14}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart u. a.}, issn = {0029-859X}, pages = {429 -- 434}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Die staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrechtliche Optionspflicht des \S 29 StAG f{\"u}r in Deutschland geborene Kinder ausl{\"a}ndischer Eltern, die jus soli die deutsche Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit erworben haben, bildete eine der Kernfragen des letzten Bundestagswahlkampfes. Im zwischen CDU/CSU und SPD abgeschlossenen Koalitionsvertrag ist vorgesehen, dass f{\"u}r in Deutschland geborene und aufgewachsene deutsche Kinder ausl{\"a}ndischer Eltern in Zukunft der Optionszwang entfallen soll und die Mehrstaatigkeit akzeptiert wird, w{\"a}hrend es im {\"U}brigen beim geltenden Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht bleiben soll. Der Beitrag untersucht vor diesem Hintergrund und im Lichte der nunmehr insoweit vorliegenden Entw{\"u}rfe die sich aus diesen politischen Vorgaben ergebenden staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrechtlichen Regelungsoptionen und -probleme.}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannLandefeld2014, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Landefeld, Sarina}, title = {Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention und Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht der Konventionsstaaten}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Ausl{\"a}nderrecht und Ausl{\"a}nderpolitik : ZAR}, volume = {34}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Ausl{\"a}nderrecht und Ausl{\"a}nderpolitik : ZAR}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {0721-5746}, pages = {97 -- 136}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @book{ZimmermannSchuetteSener2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sch{\"u}tte, Janine and Sener, Meltem}, title = {Deutsche zweiter Klasse? Eine verfassungs-, europa- und v{\"o}lkerrechtliche Analyse der Optionsregelung nach \S\S 29/40b Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsgesetz}, publisher = {Dt. Inst. f{\"u}r Menschenrechte}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-942315-83-8}, pages = {63 S.}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannElberling2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Elberling, Bj{\"o}rn}, title = {Kapitel 27 : Ausweisungsschutz}, isbn = {978-3-16-149397-3}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannBaeumler2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and B{\"a}umler, Jelena}, title = {Navigating through narrow jurisdictional straits : the Philippines - PRC South China Sea Dispute and UNCLOS}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannHenn2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Henn, Elisabeth V.}, title = {Das Aggressionsverbrechen und das deutsche Strafrecht}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Das humanit{\"a}re V{\"o}lkerrecht : Befriedung oder Mittel der Akzeptanz kriegerischer Konflikte?}, isbn = {978-3-935933-10-0}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Bringing Kosovo within the reach of the european convention on human rights : disentangling the convention and the status-issue}, isbn = {978-3-16-152628-2}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {The international court of justice and state succession to treaties: avoiding principled answers to questions of principle}, isbn = {978-0-19-965321-8}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {The security council and the obligation to prevent genocide and war crimes}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Palestine and the international criminal court quo vadis? - reach and limits of declarations under article 12(3)}, series = {Journal of international criminal justice}, volume = {11}, journal = {Journal of international criminal justice}, number = {2}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1478-1387}, doi = {10.1093/jicj/mqt014}, pages = {303 -- 329}, year = {2013}, abstract = {In 2009, 'Palestine' lodged a declaration recognizing the jurisdiction of the ICC under Article 12(3). However, in April 2012, the OTP determined that this declaration had not brought about the result, of providing for the ICC's jurisdiction, pending clarification from the political organs of the UN concerning the legal status of Palestine within the organization. On 29 November 2012, the General Assembly granted Palestine the status of a non-member observer state within the UN framework, thereby fulfilling the condition mentioned by the OTP in April 2012. It is against this background that the article considers the current legal effects of the 2009 Palestinian declaration. In particular, it addresses the issue of whether the declaration, when read in conjunction with the 29 November 2012 decision, possesses retroactive effect, i.e. whether it provides, as claimed, for the Court's temporal jurisdiction from 1 July 2002 onwards or rather starting only from 29 November 2012. ... the current status granted to Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly is that of 'observer', not as a 'Non-member State'. ... [T]his... informs the current legal status of Palestine for the interpretation and application of article 12 [Rome Statute]. ... The Office could in the future consider allegations of crimes committed in Palestine, should competent organs of the United Nations... resolve the legal issue relevant to an assessment of article 12. ... International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, 'Situation in Palestine', 3 April 2012}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannRoemer2013, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and R{\"o}mer, Lutz}, title = {Artikel 27 Dublin III-Verordnung : das Ende des Konzepts "normativer Vergewisserung"}, isbn = {978-3-8114-3914-6}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties}, series = {Journal of international criminal justice}, volume = {10}, journal = {Journal of international criminal justice}, number = {1}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1478-1387}, doi = {10.1093/jicj/mqs002}, pages = {209 -- 227}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The adoption, in Kampala in June 2010, of amendments to the Rome Statute on the crime of aggression was hailed as a historic milestone in the development of the international Criminal Court (ICC). However, the manner in which these amendments are supposed to enter into force runs the risk of undermining the rules of the international law of treaties, as well as the legality and acceptability of the Kampala compromise itself The author examines the relevant amendment procedures provided for in the ICC Statute and the compatibility with them of the amendment procedure chosen in Kampala and ultimately warns of the legal consequences which may follow from the Review Conference's somewhat-Alexandrian solution.}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute : the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Grundrechtseingriffe durch deutsche Streitkraefte im Ausland und das Grundgesetz}, issn = {0514-6496}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @book{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Grundrechtsschutz zwischen Karlsruhe und Strassburg}, series = {Schriftenreihe der Juristischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin}, volume = {190}, journal = {Schriftenreihe der Juristischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-029669-3}, doi = {10.1515/9783110296723}, pages = {36 S.}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 35}, isbn = {978-0-19-969299-6}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}ge als Katalysatoren der V{\"o}lkerrechtsentwicklung}, isbn = {978-3-86956-196-7}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannThienel2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Thienel, Tobias}, title = {Yugoslavia, cases and proceedings before the ICJ}, isbn = {978-0-19-929168-7}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {State sucession in other matters than treaties}, isbn = {978-0-19-929168-7}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @book{ZimmermannOellersFrahmTomuschatetal.2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Oellers-Frahm, Karin and Tomuschat, Christian and Tams, Christian J.}, title = {The statute of the international court of justice : a commentary}, edition = {2. ed.}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-969299-6}, pages = {1745 S.}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {State sucession in treaties}, isbn = {978-0-19-929168-7}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Continuity of states}, isbn = {978-0-19-929168-7}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {International courts and tribunals, intervention in proceedings}, isbn = {978-0-19-929168-7}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannVonMangoldt2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Von Mangoldt, Hermann}, title = {Article 53}, isbn = {978-0-19-969299-6}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannThienel2012, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Thienel, Tobias}, title = {Article 60}, isbn = {978-0-19-969299-6}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannDorschner2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Dorschner, Jonas}, title = {Article 22}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 1 A, para. 2}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 33, para. 2}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 1 F}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {The obligation to prevent genocide: towards a general responsibility to protect?}, isbn = {978-0-19-958881-7}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Einf{\"u}hrung : Folterpr{\"a}vention im v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Mehrebenensystem}, isbn = {978-3-86956-104-2}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2010, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Die Wirksamkeit rechtlicher Hegung milit{\"a}rischer Gewalt : ausgew{\"a}hlte Aspekte der Anwendbarkeit und Systemkoh{\"a}renz des humanit{\"a}ren V{\"o}lkerrechts}, isbn = {978-3-8114-7725-4}, year = {2010}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2010, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {International law scholarship in times of dictatorship and democracy : exemplified by life and work of Wilhelm Wengler}, isbn = {978-0-521-19252-1}, year = {2010}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannBaeumler2010, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and B{\"a}umler, Jelena}, title = {Der Afrikanische Gerichtshof f{\"u}r Menschen- und V{\"o}lkerrechte : aktuelle Herausforderungen}, issn = {0177-7521}, year = {2010}, language = {de} }