@article{BoernertRinglebWestphalZarubaetal.2020, author = {B{\"o}rnert-Ringleb, Moritz and Westphal, Andrea and Zaruba, Nicole and Gutmann, Franziska and Vock, Miriam}, title = {The relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and subsequent automatic evaluations amongst student teachers}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.584464}, pages = {11}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Teachers' attitudes toward inclusion are frequently cited as being an important predictor of how successfully a given inclusive school system is implemented. At the same time, beliefs about the nature of teaching and learning are discussed as a possible predictor of attitudes toward inclusion. However, more recent research emphasizes the need of considering implicit processes, such as automatic evaluations, when describing attitudes and beliefs. Previous evidence on the association of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning is solely based on explicit reports. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and the subsequent automatic evaluations of pre-service teachers (N = 197). The results revealed differences between pre-service teachers' explicit attitudes/beliefs and their subsequent automatic evaluations. Differences in the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning occur when teachers focus either on explicit measures or automatic evaluations. These differences might be due to different facets of the same attitude object being represented. Relying solely on either explicit measures or automatic evaluations at the exclusion of the other might lead to erroneous assumptions about the relation of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning.}, language = {en} } @article{ZarubaGronostajAhlgrimmetal.2022, author = {Zaruba, Nicole and Gronostaj, Anna and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Vock, Miriam}, title = {Die Entwicklung von Lehrkr{\"a}fte{\"u}berzeugungen im Praxissemester}, series = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, journal = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen : Ergebnisse der Lehrerbildungsforschung an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 2)}, number = {2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57083}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-570839}, pages = {215 -- 234}, year = {2022}, abstract = {{\"U}berzeugungen zum Lehren und Lernen sind als Teil der professionellen Kompetenz von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bereits im Lehramtsstudium relevant und haben insbesondere in l{\"a}ngeren Praxisphasen Entwicklungspotenzial. Welche Faktoren f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von {\"U}berzeugungen in Praxisphasen von Bedeutung sind, ist bislang aber nur unzureichend erforscht. In Interviews haben wir N = 16 Studierende befragt, welche Lerngelegenheiten f{\"u}r die Entwicklung ihrer {\"U}berzeugungen im Praxissemester eine Rolle spielten. Dabei konnten wir mittels Inhaltsanalyse vier {\"u}bergeordnete Faktoren identifizieren: die universit{\"a}re Lernbegleitung, die Mentorinnen und Mentoren, die Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler und die Reflexion eigener Unterrichtserfahrungen. Den Faktoren wurden untergeordnete Faktoren (z. B. Hospitationen durch Universit{\"a}tsdozierende) zugeordnet und es wird dargestellt, warum und unter welchen Umst{\"a}nden diese Lerngelegenheiten f{\"u}r die Entwicklung der {\"U}berzeugungen aus Studierendensicht relevant sind.}, language = {de} } @book{JennekRotherToschetal.2022, author = {Jennek, Julia and Rother, Stefanie and Tosch, Frank and Wendland, Mirko and Kludt, Steffen and Krauskopf, Karsten and Kitschke, Dorothea and Maar, Verena and Knigge, Michel and Gn{\"a}dig, Susanne and Seidel, Astrid and Siehr, Karl-Heinz and Wienecke, Maik and G{\"u}nther, Claudia-Susanne and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen and KloĢˆpping, Peter M. and K{\"u}choll, Denise and Lazarides, Rebecca and Westphal, Andrea and Scherreiks, Lynn and Kuhr, Linda and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen and Gronostaj, Anna and Vock, Miriam and Zaruba, Nicole and Ahlgrimm, Frederik and Link, J{\"o}rg-Werner and K{\"o}rner, Dorothea and Barseghyan, Anahit and Glowinski, Ingrid}, title = {Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen}, series = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung}, number = {2}, editor = {Jennek, Julia}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-508-8}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-50096}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-500964}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {321}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Schulpraktika bilden die zentrale Grundlage der Lehrerbildung in Potsdam. Bereits im Potsdamer Modell der Lehrerbildung (1993) sind sie festgehalten, seit der Integration des Schulpraktikums (Praxissemesters) 2008 absolvieren alle Potsdamer Lehramtsstudierenden f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika. W{\"a}hrend die Ziele der Praktika klar beschrieben sind, sind die tats{\"a}chlichen Lernerfolge nicht immer klar - ebenso wenig, wie die Begleitung der Praktika aussehen muss, um die Studierenden bestm{\"o}glich zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Auch die Integration in weitere Lehrveranstaltungen des Studiums ist ein noch offenes Feld, das weiterer Betrachtung verdient. Die unterschiedliche Ausrichtung der Potsdamer Praktika, Perspektivwechsel im Orientierungs-/Integriertem Eingangspraktikum, Selbstreflektion im Praktikum in p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Handlungsfeldern, Unterricht als Profession in den Fachdidaktischen Tagespraktika, Anwendung von Diagnostik im psychodiagnostischen Praktikum und die Synthese all dessen im Schulpraktikum, bieten daf{\"u}r zahlreiche Ansatzpunkte. Schulpraktika sind nicht nur ein zentraler und von Studierenden hoch gesch{\"a}tzter Bestandteil des Studiums, sondern werden auch zunehmend f{\"u}r die Bildungsforschung interessant. Fragen nach der Kompetenzentwicklung, Selbsteinsch{\"a}tzungen und der Entwicklung der Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit von Studierenden stehen dabei ebenso im Fokus wie die Einsch{\"a}tzung der universit{\"a}ren Begleitung und der Einbindung ins weitere Studium. Der vorliegende Band versammelt Studien von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, die die f{\"u}nf Pflichtpraktika im Lehramtsstudium unter unterschiedlichen Blickwinkel beforschen. Besonders hervorzuheben ist, dass die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen stammen und somit die Praktika mit verschiedenen Instrumenten und aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln betrachten. Die pr{\"a}sentierten Ergebnisse bilden eine gute Grundlage, um die Praktika in Potsdam und an anderen Standorten weiterzuentwickeln.}, language = {de} } @misc{ZarubaWestphalGutmannetal.2021, author = {Zaruba, Nicole and Westphal, Andrea and Gutmann, Franziska and Vock, Miriam}, title = {Preservice Teachers' Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Teaching and Learning}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, issn = {1866-8364}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-54289}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-542895}, pages = {16}, year = {2021}, abstract = {When it comes to teacher attitudes towards teaching and learning, research relies heavily on explicit measures (e.g., questionnaires). These attitudes are generally conceptualized as constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning with constructivism often considered to be more desirable. In explicit measures, this can have drawbacks like socially desirable responding. It is for this reason that, in this study, we investigated implicit attitudes as well as explicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission. N = 100 preservice teachers worked on a questionnaire and two Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT constructivism and ST-IAT transmission) before (T1) and after (T2) a single master's semester. One group (n = 50) did student teaching while a second group (n = 50) took master's courses. We evaluated preservice teachers' views on teaching at the end of their masters' studies. Participants agreed with transmission and constructivism (T1) on both an explicit and implicit level. Implicit measures seem to exceed explicit measures in differentially assessing constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning. After student teaching (T2), there was no overall effect of attitude development but changes in rank indicate that participants' implicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission developed differently for each individual.}, language = {en} } @article{ZarubaWestphalGutmannetal.2021, author = {Zaruba, Nicole and Westphal, Andrea and Gutmann, Franziska and Vock, Miriam}, title = {Preservice teachers' implicit and explicit attitudes towards teaching and learning}, series = {Frontiers in education}, volume = {6}, journal = {Frontiers in education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2021.619098}, pages = {14}, year = {2021}, abstract = {When it comes to teacher attitudes towards teaching and learning, research relies heavily on explicit measures (e.g., questionnaires). These attitudes are generally conceptualized as constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning with constructivism often considered to be more desirable. In explicit measures, this can have drawbacks like socially desirable responding. It is for this reason that, in this study, we investigated implicit attitudes as well as explicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission. N = 100 preservice teachers worked on a questionnaire and two Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT constructivism and ST-IAT transmission) before (T1) and after (T2) a single master's semester. One group (n = 50) did student teaching while a second group (n = 50) took master's courses. We evaluated preservice teachers' views on teaching at the end of their masters' studies. Participants agreed with transmission and constructivism (T1) on both an explicit and implicit level. Implicit measures seem to exceed explicit measures in differentially assessing constructivist and transmissive views on teaching and learning. After student teaching (T2), there was no overall effect of attitude development but changes in rank indicate that participants' implicit attitudes towards constructivism and transmission developed differently for each individual.}, language = {en} } @article{JurczokKalinowskiZarubaetal.2021, author = {Jurczok, Anne and Kalinowski, Eva and Zaruba, Nicole and Vock, Miriam}, title = {Kooperative Unterrichtsentwicklung an Grundschulen durch die Lesson Study-Methode}, series = {Leistung macht Schule: F{\"o}rderung leistungsstarker und potenziell besonders leistungsf{\"a}higer Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler}, journal = {Leistung macht Schule: F{\"o}rderung leistungsstarker und potenziell besonders leistungsf{\"a}higer Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler}, publisher = {Beltz}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-407-25883-0}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Zaruba2020, author = {Zaruba, Nicole}, title = {Die Entwicklung von Lehrer{\"u}berzeugungen im Potsdamer Praxissemester}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {viii, 195}, year = {2020}, language = {de} }