@article{VoellingerSpoererLubbeetal.2018,
  author    = {V{\"o}llinger, Vanessa A. and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Lubbe, Dirk and Brunstein, Joachim C.},
  title     = {A path analytic test of the reading strategies mediation model},
  series = {The Journal of Educational Research},
  volume    = {111},
  journal   = {The Journal of Educational Research},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0022-0671},
  doi       = {10.1080/00220671.2017.1412930},
  pages     = {733 -- 745},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {This study examined a theoretical model hypothesizing that reading strategies mediate the effects of intrinsic reading motivation, reading fluency, and vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension. Using path analytic methods, we tested the direct and indirect effects specified in the hypothesized model in a sample of 1105 fifth-graders. In addition to standardized tests and questionnaires, we administered a performance test to assess students' proficiency in the application of three reading strategies. The overall fit of the model to the data was good. Both cognitive (fluency and vocabulary) and motivational (intrinsic reading motivation) variables had an indirect effect on reading comprehension through their influence on reading strategies. Reading strategies had a unique effect on reading comprehension and partially mediated the effects that cognitive and motivational variables had on fifth-graders' reading achievements.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KruegerBeckmannFritzenbergetal.1999,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Tom and Beckmann, J{\"u}rgen and Fritzenberg, Martin and Kellmann, Michael and Wick, Ditmar and Ohlert, Hans Henning and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Beanspruchungs-, Erm{\"u}dungs-, Erholungs- und Regenerationsprozesse bei Leistungssportlern mit k{\"o}rperlicher Behinderung},
  issn      = {0343-6586},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HenkeBosseSpoerer2018,
  author    = {Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Binnendifferenzierung im inklusiven Unterricht},
  series = {Inklusive Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung : vom Anspruch zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung},
  journal   = {Inklusive Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung : vom Anspruch zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung},
  publisher = {Kohlhammer},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {978-3-17-032719-1},
  pages     = {143 -- 159},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LambrechtBogdaKochetal.2019,
  author    = {Lambrecht, Jennifer and Bogda, Katja and Koch, Helvi and Nottbusch, Guido and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {L{\"a}ngsschnittliche Effekte der h{\"a}uslichen und institutionellen Lernumwelt auf den Wortschatz von Grundschulkindern - ein Vergleich},
  series = {Journal for educational research online - JERO},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal for educational research online - JERO},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Waxmann},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  issn      = {1866-6671},
  pages     = {86 -- 115},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Es wird angenommen, dass f{\"u}r den fr{\"u}hen Kompetenzerwerb eines Kindes neben dem famili{\"a}ren Hintergrund und Merkmalen des Kindes die Lernumgebungen eine wichtige Rolle spielen. Die vorliegende Studie verfolgte das Ziel, die Effekte der h{\"a}uslichen und der institutionellen Lernumgebung von Kindergartenkindern auf den fr{\"u}hen Wortschatzerwerb zu vergleichen und notwendige Bedingungen f{\"u}r einen kompensatorischen Effekt der institutionellen Lernumgebung zu {\"u}berpr{\"u}fen. Anhand l{\"a}ngsschnittlicher Daten von N = 557 Kindergartenkindern aus dem deutschen Nationalen Bildungspanel (NEPS) wurde untersucht, in welchem Ausmaß der famili{\"a}re Hintergrund und die Merkmale eines Kindes die h{\"a}usliche und institutionelle Lernumgebung pr{\"a}dizieren und in welchem Ausmaß diese wiederum den Wortschatz in der Vorschule und in der ersten Klasse vorhersagen. Um zu {\"u}berpr{\"u}fen, ob die beiden Lernumgebungen einen jeweils eigenst{\"a}ndigen Beitrag zur Pr{\"a}diktion des Wortschatzes leisten, wurden nahezu identische Indikatoren zur Operationalisierung verwendet. Mittels Strukturgleichungsmodellierung wurden die Effekte gesch{\"a}tzt. Die Studie zeigte, dass die h{\"a}usliche und institutionelle Lernumgebung eines Kindes kleine sowie voneinander abgrenzbare Effekte auf den Wortschatz hatten. Dabei war die h{\"a}usliche Lernumwelt st{\"a}rker mit dem famili{\"a}ren Hintergrund assoziiert, w{\"a}hrend die institutionelle Lernumgebung st{\"a}rker durch Merkmale des Kindes selbst pr{\"a}diziert wurde. Dies er{\"o}ffnet neue M{\"o}glichkeiten der Diskussion kompensatorischer Effekte.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SpoererSchuenemann2014,
  author    = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Schuenemann, Nina},
  title     = {competence: Analyzing effects on reading comprehension, reading strategy performance, and motivation for reading},
  series = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0959-4752},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.05.002},
  pages     = {147 -- 157},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In this study, reciprocal teaching (RT) was combined with specific self-regulation procedures to promote the reading comprehension of fifth grade students. Twenty four classes with N = 534 students were assigned to RT plus strategy implementation procedures (RT +SIP), RT plus outcome regulation procedures (RT + ORP), RT plus strategy implementation and outcome regulation procedures (RT+ SRL), or RT without explicit instruction in self-regulation. At maintenance students assigned to the three self-regulation conditions outperformed RT students according to a standardized measure of reading comprehension. RT+ SIP and RT + SRL students outperformed RI as well as RI + ORP students using a measure of reading strategy performance. However, reading comprehension was only mediated by strategy performance under the RT + SRL condition. Among students assigned to the RI + ORP condition, an improvement in reading motivation between pretest and posttest and between posttest and maintenance was observed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JaeutheLenkeitBosseetal.2020,
  author    = {Jaeuthe, Jessica and Lenkeit, Jenny and Bosse, Stefanie and Bogda, Katja and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Die Bedeutsamkeit individueller Merkmale f{\"u}r die Entwicklung von Rechtschreibkompetenzen in der Grundschule},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Entwicklungspsychologie und p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  volume    = {52},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Entwicklungspsychologie und p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {0049-8637},
  doi       = {10.1026/0049-8637/a000223},
  pages     = {12 -- 24},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Aus theoretischer Sicht existieren verschiedene Merkmale, die einen Einfluss auf die individuelle Entwicklung der Rechtschreibkompetenz von Grundschulkindern aus{\"u}ben k{\"o}nnen. Um diese zu analysieren, wurden in der vorliegenden Studie Schreibungen von 607 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern zu drei Messzeitpunkten (Anfang Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 3) untersucht. Zur Bestimmung des Rechtschreibkompetenzniveaus wurden Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler mittels latenter Profilanalyse zu den drei Profilen Buchstabenentdeckende ({\"u}berwiegend nicht lautgetreue Schreibungen), Phonemprofis ({\"u}berwiegend lautgetreue Schreibungen) und Rechtschreibspezialisten (vor allem korrekte Schreibungen) zugeordnet. Mittels logistischer Regressionen wurde gepr{\"u}ft, welche Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen den individuellen Merkmalen Geschlecht, kognitive Grundf{\"a}higkeiten und Arbeitsverhalten und den Zuordnungen zu einem Profil sowie den Wechseln zwischen den Profilen bestehen. Unter Kontrolle des Arbeitsverhaltens zeigten sich keine signifikanten Zusammenh{\"a}nge mit dem Geschlecht oder der kognitiven Grundf{\"a}higkeit. Hingegen konnten bedeutsame Zusammenh{\"a}nge des Arbeitsverhaltens sowohl mit der Zuordnung zu den Profilen als auch mit den Wechseln zwischen den Profilen Phonemprofis und Rechtschreibspezialisten gefunden werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LambrechtBogdaKochetal.2019,
  author    = {Lambrecht, Jennifer and Bogda, Katja and Koch, Helvi and Nottbusch, Guido and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Die Rolle der Kindergartenqualit{\"a}t},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-019-00872-6},
  pages     = {665 -- 694},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Neben famili{\"a}ren Merkmalen hat sich die Kindergartenqualit{\"a}t als bedeutsam f{\"u}r den Wortschatz von Kindergartenkindern gezeigt. Die drei Dimensionen der Kindergartenqualit{\"a}t, die Struktur‑, Orientierungs- und Prozessqualit{\"a}t, wurden bisher jedoch nicht simultan und dom{\"a}nenspezifisch in Bezug auf den Wortschatz untersucht. In der vorliegenden Studie wird der Frage nachgegangen, wie die Dimensionen der Kindergartenqualit{\"a}t unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung famili{\"a}rer Merkmale mit dem Wortschatz von Kindern auf Individual- und Kindergartenebene zusammenh{\"a}ngen. Die Datengrundlage bildete eine Teilstichprobe des nationalen Bildungspanels („National Educational Panel Study", NEPS) mit N = 1165 Kindern in 139 Kinderg{\"a}rten. Die durchgef{\"u}hrten Mehrebenenanalysen ergaben, dass zur Pr{\"a}diktion des Wortschatzes auf Individualebene die famili{\"a}ren Merkmale bedeutsam waren, w{\"a}hrend Unterschiede zwischen Kinderg{\"a}rten mittels der Kindergartenqualit{\"a}t erkl{\"a}rt werden konnten. Dabei waren alle drei Qualit{\"a}tsdimensionen relevant. Die Ergebnisse werden vor dem Hintergrund verschiedener Qualit{\"a}tskonzeptionen diskutiert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LenkeitHartmannEhlertetal.2022,
  author    = {Lenkeit, Jenny and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on academic achievement},
  series = {International Journal of Educational Research},
  volume    = {113},
  journal   = {International Journal of Educational Research},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0883-0355},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101957},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Germany is continuously expanding its inclusive education system. Research provides evidence that students with special educational needs (SEN) in inclusive school settings show lower academic achievement and come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds than their peers without SEN. Identifying to what extent the disadvantages originating from both characteristics are confounded in predicting academic achievement, has been neglected in the German educational context. Using data of 1711 primary and secondary school students from a longitudinal study in the state of Brandenburg, this study evaluates to what degree SEN (in the areas of learning and emotional-social difficulties) and socioeconomic background (SES) are confounded in predicting academic initial achievement in reading and mathematics as well as their development over time. Using multilevel modelling techniques that nest three measurement points into students and students into classes, results identify SES and SEN as relevant predictors of achievement status and growth in both subjects. Only few and small mediation effects of SES were found, indicating that both SES and SEN remain independent risk factors for achievement. Understanding the origins of student disadvantage can help teachers to make better informed choices for designing support measures and aid policymakers' reasoning for resource allocations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JaeutheLambrechtBosseetal.2020,
  author    = {Jaeuthe, Jessica and Lambrecht, Jennifer and Bosse, Stefanie and Bogda, Katja and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Entwicklung der Rechtschreibkompetenz im zweiten und dritten Schuljahr},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-020-00959-5},
  pages     = {823 -- 846},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Im deutschsprachigen Raum existiert eine Vielzahl von Modellen zur Entwicklung der Rechtschreibkompetenz von Grundschulkindern. Es zeigen sich starke {\"U}bereinstimmungen in der Vorstellung von aufeinanderfolgenden Kompetenzniveaus, wobei in allen Modellen drei Niveaus auftreten: 1) noch nicht lautgetreue Schreibungen, 2) lautgetreue Schreibungen und 3) orthographisch korrekte Schreibungen. Die Kriterien, auf Basis derer ein Kind dem jeweiligen Niveau zugeordnet wird, bleiben jedoch vage. Ebenso fehlt eine umfassende empirische {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung der Modelle. Die vorliegende L{\"a}ngsschnittstudie untersuchte zu drei Messzeitpunkten (Anfang Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 2, Ende Klasse 3) die Schreibungen von N = 697 Grundschulkinder mit standardisierten Rechtschreibtests. Mittels latenter Transitionsanalyse wurden drei Profile identifiziert: 1) {\"U}berwiegend nicht lautgetreu 2) {\"U}berwiegend lautgetreu und 3) {\"U}berwiegend korrekt. Auch die durchlaufenen Pfade und {\"U}bergangswahrscheinlichkeiten st{\"u}tzen die angenommene hierarchische Struktur der Modelle.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SpoererGlaser2010,
  author    = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Glaser, Cornelia},
  title     = {F{\"o}rderung selbstregulierten Lernens im schulischen Kontext},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/A000014},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Selbstreguliertes Lernen umfasst gedankliche und verhaltensbezogene Aktivit{\"a}ten, die Lernende dazu bef{\"a}higen, aufgabenspezifische Fertigkeiten effizient erwerben sowie wirksam und nachhaltig einsetzen zu k{\"o}nnen. In dem vorliegenden Editorial werden einschl{\"a}gige Funktions- und Ordnungssysteme selbstregulierten Lernens sowie charakteristische Formen der Vermittlung und Anwendung strategischer Fertigkeiten gekennzeichnet, einschließlich eines {\"U}berblicks zu den Beitr{\"a}gen des Themenschwerpunktes zur «F{\"o}rderung selbstregulierten Lernens im schulischen Kontext». Als Bestandsaufnahme vorliegender Beitr{\"a}ge werden Grenzen bisheriger und Perspektiven zuk{\"u}nftiger Forschung in diesem Bereich benannt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SpoererBrunsteinKieschke2009,
  author    = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Brunstein, Joachim Clemens and Kieschke, Ulf},
  title     = {Improving students' reading comprehension skills : effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching},
  issn      = {0959-4752},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different forms of strategy instruction on 210 elementary-school students' reading comprehension. Students were assigned to any one of three intervention conditions or to a traditional instruction condition (control condition). Training students were taught four reading strategies (summarizing, questioning, clarifying, predicting) and practiced these strategies in small groups (reciprocal teaching), pairs, or instructor-guided small groups. At both the post- and follow-up test the intervention students attained higher scores on an experiment-developed task of reading comprehension and strategy use than the control students who received traditional instruction. Furthermore, students who practiced reciprocal teaching in small groups outperformed use than the control students who received traditional instruction groups on a standardized reading comprehension test.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BosseHenkeSpoerer2018,
  author    = {Bosse, Stefanie and Henke, Thorsten and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Inklusion aus der Perspektive der Lernenden},
  series = {Leistung und Wohlbefinden in der Schule: Herausforderung Inklusion},
  journal   = {Leistung und Wohlbefinden in der Schule: Herausforderung Inklusion},
  publisher = {Belz},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-3859-0},
  pages     = {256 -- 271},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchuenemannSpoererBrunstein2013,
  author    = {Sch{\"u}nemann, Nina and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Brunstein, Joachim Clemens},
  title     = {Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching - a moderator-mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders' reading comprehension},
  series = {Contemporary educational psychology},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Contemporary educational psychology},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {San Diego},
  issn      = {0361-476X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.002},
  pages     = {289 -- 305},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {In this classroom intervention study, reciprocal teaching (RI) of reading strategies was combined with explicit instruction in self-regulated learning (SRL) to promote the reading comprehension of fifth-grade students (N = 306). Twelve intact classes were randomly assigned either to an RT + SRL condition or to an RI condition without explicit instruction in self-regulation. Three additional classes served as a no-treatment comparison group. Strategies instruction was delivered by trained assistants in conventional German language lessons. Students practiced the application of these strategies in small groups. Both at posttest and at maintenance (8 weeks after the intervention), students in the two intervention conditions (RT and RI + SRL) outperformed comparison students in measures of reading comprehension, strategy-related task performance, and self-efficacy for reading. Relative to RI students, students in the RI + SRL condition were better able to maintain training-induced performance gains over the follow-up interval. A moderated mediation analysis revealed that this difference in the sustainability of the two treatments was (a) mediated by the successful mastery of the learned strategies and (b) most evident among students with poor reading fluency skills.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SpoererHenkeBosse2021,
  author    = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie},
  title     = {Is there a dark side of co-teaching?},
  series = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction},
  volume    = {71},
  journal   = {Learning and instruction : the journal of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0959-4752},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101393},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HenkeBosseLambrechtetal.2017,
  author    = {Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie and Lambrecht, Jennifer and J{\"a}ntsch, Christian and Jaeuthe, Jessica and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Mittendrin oder nur dabei?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  volume    = {31},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000196},
  pages     = {111 -- 123},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In der vorliegenden Studie wurde das Ausmaß der sozialen Partizipation von Grundsch{\"u}lerinnen und Grundsch{\"u}lern mit einem und ohne festgestelltem sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf (SPF) untersucht. Insgesamt wurden N = 1436 Sch{\"u}ler der 2. und 3. Jahrgangsstufe mittels Frageb{\"o}gen zum peerbezogenen Klassenklima, zur Einsch{\"a}tzung der eigenen sozialen Integration, zum Gef{\"u}hl des Angenommen-Seins durch die Lehrkraft und zur Anzahl ihrer Freundschaften befragt. Mithilfe des Propensity Score Matching-Verfahrens wurden den Sch{\"u}lern mit einem festgestellten SPF in den Bereichen Lernen, emotionale und soziale Entwicklung oder Sprache (N = 91) basierend auf theoretisch und empirisch abgeleiteten Hintergrundvariablen statistische Zwillinge ohne SPF zugeordnet. Zu den Hintergrundvariablen z{\"a}hlten famili{\"a}re, leistungs- und verhaltensbezogene Merkmale. Der Vergleich der Sch{\"u}ler mit einem festgestellten SPF mit ihren statistischen Zwillingen ohne SPF lieferte keine Hinweise auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen dem Status eines SPF und der sozialen Partizipation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchuenemannSpoererVoellingeretal.2017,
  author    = {Sch{\"u}nemann, Nina and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Voellinger, Vanessa A. and Brunstein, Joachim Clemens},
  title     = {Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups},
  series = {Instructional Science},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {Instructional Science},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0020-4277},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11251-017-9409-1},
  pages     = {395 -- 415},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The goal of this research was to highlight the role social regulatory processes play in making students' teamwork in reciprocal teaching (RT) groups (a classroom activity in which students take the teacher's role in small group reading sessions) effective. In addition to teamwork quality, we expected peer feedback to be a key factor in enhancing students' reading comprehension achievements. Because previous research (Sch{\"u}nemann et al. in Contemp Educ Psychol 38:289-305, 2013) has shown that procedures of self-regulated learning (SRL) augment the effects of RT methods, we further assumed that such procedures would promote the quality of students' collaborative efforts. In a cluster-randomized trial, students in 12 fifth-grade classes practiced a strategic approach to reading either in a RT condition or in a RT + SRL condition. In one of the 14 sessions, students' interactive behavior was videotaped. Strategy use and reading comprehension were assessed at pretest, posttest, and maintenance. Performance differences between conditions were reliable only at maintenance. A multilevel mediation analysis showed that relative to RT students, RT + SRL students were better able to provide their teammates with informative feedback and organize their group work in a task-focused manner. Only feedback quality mediated the sustainability of treatment effects on strategy use and reading comprehension. In essence, this research suggests that effective reading comprehension trainings should integrate explicit instruction and practice in reading strategies, SRL, and focus on supportive peer processes in small groups with extensive instruction and practice in peer feedback.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SeuringSpoerer2010,
  author    = {Seuring, Vanessa A. and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Reziprokes Lehren in der Schule : F{\"o}rderung von Leseverst{\"a}ndnis, Lesefl{\"u}ssigkeit und Strategieanwendung},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/A000016},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In dieser Studie wurde untersucht, wie das Leseverst{\"a}ndnis von Sch{\"u}lern der 5. Klasse mittels reziproken Lehrens gef{\"o}rdert werden kann. Dabei wurde insbesondere betrachtet, welche Relevanz die Vermittlung spezifischer Lesestrategien besitzt. Die Stichprobe bestand aus 380 Sch{\"u}lern aus 15 Klassen, die einer von drei Bedingungen zugewiesen wurden: (a) Training der vier Lesestrategien Kl{\"a}ren, Fragen, Vorhersagen, Zusammenfassen (4S), (b) Training der drei Lesestrategien Kl{\"a}ren, Fragen, Vorhersagen (3S) oder (c) Training der Lesefl{\"u}ssigkeit (LF; keine Vermittlung von Lesestrategien). Der Lernerfolg wurde unmittelbar sowie 9 Wochen nach Abschluss der Intervention mittels standardisierter Leseverst{\"a}ndnis- und Lesefl{\"u}ssigkeitstests sowie selbst konstruierter Tests zur Erfassung der Qualit{\"a}t der Strategieanwendung erhoben. Zus{\"a}tzlich wurden im Verlauf des Trainings Prozessdaten erfasst. Bezogen auf die Lesefl{\"u}ssigkeit zeigte der Pr{\"a}test-Posttest-Vergleich, dass sich Sch{\"u}ler aller Bedingungen verbesserten. Zum Follow-up-Test schnitten hingegen LF-Sch{\"u}ler besser ab als Sch{\"u}ler der Strategie-Bedingungen. Bezogen auf das Leseverst{\"a}ndnis erreichten nach Abschluss des Trainings 3S-Sch{\"u}ler bessere Leistungen als Sch{\"u}ler der anderen Trainingsbedingungen. Sie konnten ihren Vorsprung mittelfristig jedoch nicht aufrechterhalten. 3S- und 4S-Sch{\"u}ler erstellten zum Posttest signifikant bessere Zusammenfassungen als LF-Sch{\"u}ler. Schließlich zeigten die Prozessdaten, dass sich Sch{\"u}ler beider Strategiebedingungen kontinuierlich in der Anwendung der Lesestrategien Fragen und Vorhersagen verbesserten. Es werden Ver{\"a}nderungen des Trainings zur Steigerung der Effektivit{\"a}t bei Umsetzung in Regelschulklassen diskutiert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BrunsteinSpoerer2018,
  author    = {Brunstein, Joachim C. and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Selbstgesteuertes Lernen},
  series = {Handw{\"o}rterbuch p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  journal   = {Handw{\"o}rterbuch p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  edition   = {5., {\"u}berarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage},
  publisher = {Weinheim},
  address   = {Beltz},
  isbn      = {978-3-621-28297-0},
  pages     = {742 -- 749},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{BrunsteinSpoerer2001,
  author    = {Brunstein, Joachim Clemens and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Selbstgesteuertes Lernen},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{CelebiKraheSpoerer2014,
  author    = {Celebi, Christin and Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Strengthened for the teaching profession: promoting professional competencies in teacher training students},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000128},
  pages     = {115 -- 126},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {A quasi-experimental study with N = 293 participants studying toward a teaching degree examined the efficacy of the intervention program "Strengthened for the teaching profession". In a pre-, intermediate- and post-test control group design, three treatment conditions that focused (1) on their individual professional strengths, (2) professional weaknesses, or (3) a combination of strengths and weaknesses were compared to a no-treatment control condition. Both at intermediate test and at posttest, students in the three intervention conditions scored higher than students in the control group on measures of self-efficacy and professional self-regulation. The combined intervention condition was more successful at promoting professional self-efficacy and self-regulation than the intervention focusing either on strengths or relative weaknesses only. The implications of the findings for teacher training are discussed.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KochSpoerer2017,
  author    = {Koch, Helvi and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Students improve in reading comprehension by learning how to teach reading strategies},
  series = {Psychology Learning and Teaching},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Psychology Learning and Teaching},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1475-7257},
  doi       = {10.1177/1475725717700525},
  pages     = {197 -- 211},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In this intervention study, we investigated how we could teach university students who were majoring in education to teach reading strategies. The goal of the study was to analyze whether and to what extent students would benefit from the intervention with respect to their own learning. Did their own reading skills improve after they attended the intervention? The sample consisted of n = 61 students who were assigned to one of two conditions: (a) an adaption of reciprocal teaching; and (b) a control group that was not taught how to teach reading strategies. The evidence-based teaching method used in the intervention condition consisted of three elements: modeling, scaffolding, and repeated practice. Training success was assessed in a pre-posttest control group design with standardized reading comprehension and reading speed tests. To compare the development of the students in the two conditions, repeated measures ANOVAs were used. At posttest, intervention students outperformed control students in reading comprehension as well as in reading speed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SpoererLenkeitBosseetal.2020,
  author    = {Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine and Lenkeit, Jenny and Bosse, Stefanie and Hartmann, Anne and Ehlert, Antje and Knigge, Michel},
  title     = {Students' perspective on inclusion},
  series = {International journal of educational research},
  volume    = {103},
  journal   = {International journal of educational research},
  publisher = {Elsevier Science},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0883-0355},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101641},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The goal of the present study was to analyze how students' attitudes towards inclusive education develop over the course of a school year and how these attitudes relate to students' peer relations. Sixth- and seventh-graders of 44 inclusive classes filled out a questionnaire at two measurement points within one school year to assess attitudes towards inclusive education and peer relations. Applying multilevel regression analyses it turned out that changes in peer relations over time were positively predicted by students' attitudes towards instructional adaptations for students with behaviour difficulties. Further, students with self-perceived behavior difficulties reported lower scores for peer relations compared to students without self-perceived difficulties. Results are discussed with respect to structural factors and individual characteristics affecting inclusive education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HenkeBogdaLambrechtetal.2017,
  author    = {Henke, Thorsten and Bogda, Katja and Lambrecht, Jennifer and Bosse, Stefanie and Koch, Helvi and Maaz, Kai and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Will you be my friend? A multilevel network analysis of friendships of students with and without special educational needs backgrounds in inclusive classrooms},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-017-0767-x},
  pages     = {449 -- 474},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between having a special educational needs background (SEN) and the likelihood of having friends in inclusive classes. We assumed that a combination of individual, dyadic and contextual variables can sufficiently explain the relation between a SEN diagnosis and the likelihood of friendship. Data analysis was based on a cross-sectional sample of students (N = 1241) in second and third grade primary-school classes. To address the different levels adequately, the present study improves upon previous research in two ways: First, the sociometric data were analyzed with the p2 model, a specialized multilevel network model. Second, the study focused solely on friendships and emphasized the concept's unique features with respect to inclusive education. Data analysis indicated that students with SEN had a decreased probability of becoming friends with their classmates compared to students without SEN. Even when individual, dyadic, and contextual variables were included into the model, the association between a SEN diagnosis and the likelihood of friendship persisted. The implications of the results are discussed with respect to their implications for inclusive teaching practice.},
  language  = {en}
}