@article{AkcayDueşerNozonetal.2013,
  author    = {Ak{\c{c}}ay, Pinar and D{\"u}{\c{s}}er, Ece and Nozon, Hannes and Strehmel, Christian},
  title     = {Deepening understanding},
  series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  journal   = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2194-1599},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65957},
  pages     = {53 -- 59},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {1. Introduction 2. What is deepening understanding and why do we need it? 3. Which concepts were offered to explainthe differences between countries? 4. Maps 5. Summary of the appreciation andperception of the student teachers 6. Summary of the appreciation and perception of the pupils},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AltuntaşAkcayKoolsetal.2012,
  author    = {Altunta{\c{s}}, Kezban and Ak{\c{c}}ay, Pinar and Kools, Suzanne and Schnabel, Richard},
  title     = {Assignments, curriculum framework and background information as the base of developing lessons},
  series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  journal   = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2194-1599},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65877},
  pages     = {93 -- 98},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {1. What are the general strengths of the assignments? 2. Structure of the assignment 3. Resources of the assignment 4. Fostering self-expression 5. How could you improve the assignment? 6. Lack of specific examples 7. Not relating the issue to the students 8. Language Problems 9. Infeasibility to adaptation 10. In what ways was the additional information useful ? How could this be improved? 11. Was the framework useful for you and in what way? 12. In what ways did the assignments reflect the steps identified in the framework?},
  language  = {en}
}