@article{HollensteinTrondlePlomeckaetal.2023,
  author    = {Hollenstein, Nora and Trondle, Marius and Plomecka, Martyna and Kiegeland, Samuel and Ozyurt, Yilmazcan and J{\"a}ger, Lena Ann and Langer, Nicolas},
  title     = {The ZuCo benchmark on cross-subject reading task classification with EEG and eye-tracking data},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028824},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {We present a new machine learning benchmark for reading task classification with the goal of advancing EEG and eye-tracking research at the intersection between computational language processing and cognitive neuroscience. The benchmark task consists of a cross-subject classification to distinguish between two reading paradigms: normal reading and task-specific reading. The data for the benchmark is based on the Zurich Cognitive Language Processing Corpus (ZuCo 2.0), which provides simultaneous eye-tracking and EEG signals from natural reading of English sentences. The training dataset is publicly available, and we present a newly recorded hidden testset. We provide multiple solid baseline methods for this task and discuss future improvements. We release our code and provide an easy-to-use interface to evaluate new approaches with an accompanying public leaderboard: .},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuerkiFoschiniViebahnGafos2020,
  author    = {B{\"u}rki-Foschini, Audrey Damaris and Viebahn, Malte Clemens and Gafos, Adamantios I.},
  title     = {Plasticity and transfer in the sound system},
  series = {Language, cognition and neuroscience},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {Language, cognition and neuroscience},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {2327-3798},
  doi       = {10.1080/23273798.2020.1782445},
  pages     = {1371 -- 1393},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This study focuses on the ability of the adult sound system to reorganise as a result of experience. Participants were exposed to existing and novel syllables in either a listening task or a production task over the course of two days. On the third day, they named disyllabic pseudowords while their electroencephalogram was recorded. The first syllable of these pseudowords had either been trained in the auditory modality, trained in production or had not been trained. The EEG response differed between existing and novel syllables for untrained but not for trained syllables, indicating that training novel sound sequences modifies the processes involved in the production of these sequences to make them more similar to those underlying the production of existing sound sequences. Effects of training on the EEG response were observed both after production training and mere auditory exposure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FargierBuerkiFoschiniPinetetal.2017,
  author    = {Fargier, Raphael and B{\"u}rki-Foschini, Audrey Damaris and Pinet, Svetlana and Alario, F. -Xavier and Laganaro, Marina},
  title     = {Word onset phonetic properties and motor artifacts in speech production EEG recordings},
  series = {Psychophysiology : journal of the Society for Psychophysiological Research},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Psychophysiology : journal of the Society for Psychophysiological Research},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0048-5772},
  doi       = {10.1111/psyp.12982},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Electrophysiological research using verbal response paradigms faces the problem of muscle artifacts that occur during speech production or in the period preceding articulation. In this context, this paper has two related aims. The first is to show how the nature of the first phoneme influences the alignment of the ERPs. The second is to further characterize the EEG signal around the onset of articulation, both in temporal and frequency domains. Participants were asked to name aloud pictures of common objects. We applied microstate analyses and time-frequency transformations of ERPs locked to vocal onset to compare the EEG signal between voiced and unvoiced labial plosive word onset consonants. We found a delay of about 40 ms in the set of stable topographic patterns for /b/ relative to /p/ onset words. A similar shift was observed in the power increase of gamma oscillations (30-50 Hz), which had an earlier onset for /p/ trials (similar to 150 ms before vocal onset). This 40-ms shift is consistent with the length of the voiced proportion of the acoustic signal prior to the release of the closure in the vocal responses. These results demonstrate that phonetic features are an important parameter affecting response-locked ERPs, and hence that the onset of the acoustic energy may not be an optimal trigger for synchronizing the EEG activity to the response in vocal paradigms. The indexes explored in this study provide a step forward in the characterization of muscle-related artifacts in electrophysiological studies of speech and language production.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoschKrauseLeminen2017,
  author    = {Bosch, Sina and Krause, Helena and Leminen, Alina},
  title     = {The time-course of morphosyntactic and semantic priming in late bilinguals: A study of German adjectives},
  series = {Bilingualism : language and cognition.},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Bilingualism : language and cognition.},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1366-7289},
  doi       = {10.1017/S1366728916000055},
  pages     = {435 -- 456},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {How do late proficient bilinguals process morphosyntactic and lexical-semantic information in their non-native language (L2)? How is this information represented in the L2 mental lexicon? And what are the neural signatures of L2 morphosyntactic and lexical-semantic processing? We addressed these questions in one behavioral and two ERP priming experiments on inflected German adjectives testing a group of advanced late Russian learners of German in comparison to native speaker (L1) controls. While in the behavioral experiment, the L2 learners performed native-like, the ERP data revealed clear L1/L2 differences with respect to the temporal dynamics of grammatical processing. Specifically, our results show that L2 morphosyntactic processing yielded temporally and spatially extended brain responses relative to L1 processing, indicating that grammatical processing of inflected words in an L2 is more demanding and less automatic than in the L1. However, this group of advanced L2 learners showed native-like lexical-semantic processing.},
  language  = {en}
}