@book{OPUS4-50648,
  title     = {Social Movements and Organized Labour},
  editor    = {Grote, J{\"u}rgen R. and Wagemann, Claudius},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  isbn      = {978-1-315-60955-3},
  pages     = {232},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This book is about the building of alliances and about joint activities between two groups of social movement actors ascribed increasing relevance for the functioning and the eventual amendment of democratic capitalism. The chapters provide a well-balanced mix of theoretical and empirical accounts on the political, social and economic catalysts behind the changing motives finding expression in a multitude of novel types of joint collective action and inter-organizational alliances. The contributors to this volume go beyond attempting to place unions, movements, crises, precariousness, protests and coalitions at the centre of the research. Instead, they focus on actors who themselves transcend clear-cut social camps. They look at the values and motives underlying collective action by both types of actors as much as at their structural and strategic properties, and inter-organizational relations and networks. This creates a fresh, genuine and historically valid account of the incompatibilities and the commonalities of movements and unions, and of prospects for inter-organizational learning.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Doerfler2019,
  author    = {D{\"o}rfler, Thomas},
  title     = {Security council sanctions governance},
  series = {Routledge research on the United Nations ; 6},
  journal   = {Routledge research on the United Nations ; 6},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-0-42944-232-2},
  doi       = {10.4324/9780429442322},
  pages     = {xiii, 239},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Little is known about how far-reaching decisions in UN Security Council sanctions committees are made. Developing a novel committee governance concept and using examples drawn from sanctions imposed on Iraq, Al-Qaida, Congo, Sudan and Iran, this book shows that Council members tend to follow the will of the powerful, whereas sanctions committee members often decide according to the rules. This is surprising since both Council and committees are staffed by the same member states. Offering a fascinating account of Security Council micro-politics and decision-making processes on sanctions, this rigorous comparative and theory-driven analysis treats the Council and its sanctions committees as distinguishable entities that may differ in decision practice despite having the same members. Drawing extensively on primary documents, diplomatic cables, well-informed press coverage, reports by close observers and extensive interviews with committee members, Council diplomats and sanctions experts, it contrasts with the conventional wisdom on decision-making within these bodies, which suggests that the powerful permanent members would not accept rule-based decisions against their interests. This book will be of interest to policy practitioners and scholars working in the broad field of international organizations and international relations theory as well as those specializing in sanctions, international law, the Security Council and counter-terrorism.},
  language  = {en}
}