@phdthesis{Lehmann2011,
  author    = {Lehmann, Martin},
  title     = {Back to the roots : regulation of arabidopsis root metabolism during oxidative stress},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {154 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Nahavandi2011,
  author    = {Nahavandi, Nahid},
  title     = {Genetic and morphological analysis on the evolution of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Pontogammarus maeoticus},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {54 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Matthes2011,
  author    = {Matthes, Heidrun},
  title     = {Interaction of land surface processes and the atmophere in the Arctic - senitivities and extremes},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {123 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Borwankar2011,
  author    = {Borwankar, Tejas},
  title     = {Natural osmolytes remodel the aggregation pathway of mutant huntingtin exon 1},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {120 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Frueh2011,
  author    = {Fr{\"u}h, Johannes},
  title     = {Structural change of polyelectrolyte multilayers under mechanical stress},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {194 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ShuZhouYan2011,
  author    = {Shu, Hua and Zhou, Wei and Yan, Ming},
  title     = {Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading},
  doi       = {10.3758/s13414-010-0029-y},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {In alphabetic writing systems, saccade amplitude (a close correlate of reading speed) is independent of font size, presumably because an increase in the angular size of letters is compensated for by a decrease of visual acuity with eccentricity. We propose that this invariance may (also) be due to the presence of spaces between words, guiding the eyes across a large range of font sizes. Here, we test whether saccade amplitude is also invariant against manipulations of font size during reading Chinese, a character-based writing system without spaces as explicit word boundaries for saccade-target selection. In contrast to word-spaced alphabetic writing systems, saccade amplitude decreased significantly with increased font size, leading to an increase in the number of fixations at the beginning of words and in the number of refixations. These results are consistent with a model which assumes that word beginning (rather than word center) is the default saccade target if the length of the parafoveal word is not available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RisseKliegl2011,
  author    = {Risse, Sarah and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Adult age difference in the perceptual span during reading},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Following up on research suggesting an age-related reduction in the rightward extent of the perceptual span during reading (Rayner, Castelhano, \& Yang, 2009), we compared old and young adults in an N + 2-boundary paradigm in which a nonword preview of word N + 2 or word N + 2 itself is replaced by the target word once the eyes cross an invisible boundary located after word N. The intermediate word N + 1 was always three letters long. Gaze durations on word N + 2 were significantly shorter for identical than nonword N + 2 preview both for young and for old adults, with no significant difference in this preview benefit. Young adults, however, did modulate their gaze duration on word N more strongly than old adults in response to the difficulty of the parafoveal word N + 1. Taken together, the results suggest a dissociation of preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effect. Results are discussed in terms of age-related decline in resilience towards distributed processing while simultaneously preserving the ability to integrate parafoveal information into foveal processing. As such, the present results relate to proposals of regulatory compensation strategies older adults use to secure an overall reading speed very similar to that of young adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BostonHalbeVasishthetal.2011,
  author    = {Boston, Marisa Ferrara and Halbe, John T. and Vasishth, Shravan and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Parallel processing and entence comprehension difficulty},
  doi       = {10.1080/01690965.2010.492228},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Eye fixation durations during normal reading correlate with processing difficulty, but the specific cognitive mechanisms reflected in these measures are not well understood. This study finds support in German readers' eye fixations for two distinct difficulty metrics: surprisal, which reflects the change in probabilities across syntactic analyses as new words are integrated; and retrieval, which quantifies comprehension difficulty in terms of working memory constraints. We examine the predictions of both metrics using a family of dependency parsers indexed by an upper limit on the number of candidate syntactic analyses they retain at successive words. Surprisal models all fixation measures and regression probability. By contrast, retrieval does not model any measure in serial processing. As more candidate analyses are considered in parallel at each word, retrieval can account for the same measures as surprisal. This pattern suggests an important role for ranked parallelism in theories of sentence comprehension.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Klie2011,
  author    = {Klie, Sebastian},
  title     = {Integrative analysis of hight-throughput "omics"-data and structured biological knowledge},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {102 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{CamaraMattosMartins2011,
  author    = {Camara Mattos Martins, Marina},
  title     = {What are the downstream targets of trehalose-6-phosphate signalling in plants?},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  pages     = {164 S.},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}