@article{OllierMelligerLilliestam2020,
  author    = {Ollier, Lana and Melliger, Marc Andr{\´e} and Lilliestam, Johan},
  title     = {Friends or foes?},
  series = {Energies : open-access journal of related scientific research, technology development and studies in policy and management},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Energies : open-access journal of related scientific research, technology development and studies in policy and management},
  number    = {23},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {1996-1073},
  doi       = {10.3390/en13236339},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Energy efficiency measures and the deployment of renewable energy are commonly presented as two sides of the same coin-as necessary and synergistic measures to decarbonize energy systems and reach the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement. Here, we quantitatively investigate the policies and performances of the EU Member States to see whether renewables and energy efficiency policies are politically synergistic or if they rather compete for political attention and resources. We find that Member States, especially the ones perceived as climate leaders, tend to prioritize renewables over energy efficiency in target setting. Further, almost every country performs well in either renewable energy or energy efficiency, but rarely performs well in both. We find no support for the assertion that the policies are synergistic, but some evidence that they compete. However, multi-linear regression models for performance show that performance, especially in energy efficiency, is also strongly associated with general economic growth cycles, and not only efficiency policy as such. We conclude that renewable energy and energy efficiency are not synergistic policies, and that there is some competition between them.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HippBuenningMunnesetal.2020,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Munnes, Stefan and Sauermann, Armin},
  title     = {Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Konstanz},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7741},
  pages     = {109 -- 113},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper examines and discusses the biases and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions that are currently being used in many medical, epidemiological, and sociological studies on the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing the consistency of answers to retrospective questions provided by respondents who participated in the first two waves of a survey on the social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, we illustrate the insights generated by a large body of survey research on the use of retrospective questions and recall accuracy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Rothermel2020,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Global-local dynamics in anti-feminist discourses},
  series = {International affairs},
  volume    = {96},
  journal   = {International affairs},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0020-5850},
  doi       = {10.1093/ia/iiaa130},
  pages     = {1367 -- 1385},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Women's rights are a core part of a global consensus on human rights. However, we are currently experiencing an increasing popularity of anti-feminist and misogynist politics threatening to override feminist gains. In order to help explain this current revival and appeal, in this article I analyse how anti-feminist communities construct their collective identities at the intersection of local and global trends and affiliations. Through an in-depth analysis of representations in the collective identities of six popular online anti-feminist communities based in India, Russia and the United States, I shed light on how anti-feminists discursively construct their anti-feminist 'self' and the feminist 'other' between narratives of localized resistance to change and backlash against the results of broader societal developments associated with globalization. The results expose a complex set of global-local dynamics, which provide a nuanced understanding of the differences and commonalities of anti-feminist collective identity-building and mobilization processes across contexts. By explicitly focusing on the role of discursively produced locations for anti-feminist identity-building and providing new evidence on anti-feminist communities across three different continents, the article contributes to current discussions on transnational anti-feminist mobilizations in both social movement studies and feminist International Relations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BobzienKalleitner2020,
  author    = {Bobzien, Licia and Kalleitner, Fabian},
  title     = {Attitudes towards European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic},
  series = {European societies},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {European societies},
  number    = {Sup. 1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1461-6696},
  doi       = {10.1080/14616696.2020.1836669},
  pages     = {S791 -- S804},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic affects all European countries, the ways in which these countries are prepared for the health and subsequent economic crisis varies considerably. Financial solidarity within the European Union (EU) could mitigate some of these inequalities but depends upon the support of the citizens of individual member states for such policies. This paper studies attitudes of the Austrian population - a net-contributor to the European budget - towards financial solidarity using two waves of the Austrian Corona Panel Project collected in May and June 2020. We find that individuals (i) who are less likely to consider the Covid-19 pandemic as a national economic threat, (ii) who believe that Austria benefits from supporting other countries, and (iii) who prefer the crisis to be organized more centrally at EU-level show higher support for European financial solidarity. Using fixed effects models, we further show that perceiving economic threats and preferring central crisis management also explain attitude dynamics within individuals over time. We conclude that cost-benefit perceptions are important determinants for individual support of European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FleischerReiners2021,
  author    = {Fleischer, Julia and Reiners, Nina},
  title     = {Connecting international relations and public administration},
  series = {International studies review},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {International studies review},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1521-9488},
  doi       = {10.1093/isr/viaa097},
  pages     = {1230 -- 1247},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The recent debate on administrative bodies in international organizations has brought forward multiple theoretical perspectives, analytical frameworks, and methodological approaches. Despite these efforts to advance knowledge on these actors, the research program on international public administrations (IPAs) has missed out on two important opportunities: reflection on scholarship in international relations (IR) and public administration and synergies between these disciplinary perspectives. Against this backdrop, the essay is a discussion of the literature on IPAs in IR and public administration. We found influence, authority, and autonomy of international bureaucracies have been widely addressed and helped to better understand the agency of such non-state actors in global policy-making. Less attention has been given to the crucial macro-level context of politics for administrative bodies, despite the importance in IR and public administration scholarship. We propose a focus on agency and politics as future avenues for a comprehensive, joint research agenda for international bureaucracies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DapprichCockshott2023,
  author    = {Dapprich, Jan Philipp and Cockshott, William Paul},
  title     = {Input-output planning and information},
  series = {Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization},
  journal   = {Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization},
  number    = {205},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0167-2681},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.043},
  pages     = {412 -- 422},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In this paper, we show how socialist planning can be based on input-output data. We argue that the information required for this can be obtained by a central planning agency and thus dismiss Hayek's information argument against socialism. We further show how economic planning can be made responsive to consumer demand through a feedback control mechanism. Output targets of products would be adjusted in response to observed consumer demand or based on predictions about future demand. Planners can use machine learning to make more accurate forecasts. The valuation of goods plays an important role in the feedback control mechanism. The values of goods can either be measured by the labour time necessary for their production (labour values) or through shadow prices based on linear programming.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Reiners2021,
  author    = {Reiners, Nina},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Milewicz, Karolina M.: Constitutionalizing world politics : the logic of democratic power and the unintended consequences of international treaty making. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. - 354 S. - ISBN: 978-1-108-83509-1},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : PVS : German political science quarterly},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : PVS : German political science quarterly},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11615-021-00333-y},
  pages     = {575 -- 577},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kohler2020,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich},
  title     = {Survey Research Methods during the COVID-19 Crisis},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Konstanz},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7769},
  pages     = {93 -- 94},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@masterthesis{Kabaali2022,
  type      = {Bachelor Thesis},
  author    = {Kabaali, Daphne},
  title     = {Die Rolle von Street-Level Bureaucrats bei der Erbringung von {\"o}ffentlichen Leistungen - eine empirische Untersuchung},
  issn      = {2190-4561},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56355},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-563555},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {ii, 29},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Die Transformation der {\"o}ffentlichen Verantwortung im Bereich der sozialen Wohlfahrt f{\"u}hrte in den letzten Jahren zu einem gestiegenen Forschungsinteresse an Mitarbeiten-den, die sich an der Schnittstelle zwischen {\"o}ffentlicher Verwaltung und direktem Kontakt zu Klient*innen befinden. Die vorliegende Arbeit geht am Beispiel der Schulsozialarbeit an Potsdamer Grundschulen der Frage nach, inwieweit Vertrauen in Klient*innen die Nutzung von Ermessensspielr{\"a}umen durch Schulsozialarbeiter*innen beeinflusst. Das Street-Level Bureaucracy Framework nach Michael Lipsky spannt dabei den theoretischen Rahmen, w{\"a}hrend qualitative Interviews mit Schulsozialarbei-ter*innen die Basis f{\"u}r die Beantwortung der Forschungsfrage darstellen. Die Ergebnis-se zeigen, dass ein geringeres Maß an Vertrauen in Klient*innen daf{\"u}r sorgt, dass Schulsozialarbeiter*innen durch Bew{\"a}ltigungsstrategien wie der Rationierung von Res-sourcen und dem gedanklichen R{\"u}ckzug von Klient*innen versuchen, ihre Arbeitslast zu verringern. Ein h{\"o}heres Maß an Vertrauen in Klient*innen sorgt hingegen daf{\"u}r, dass sie ihre Ermessensspielr{\"a}ume zu Gunsten dieser Klient*innen nutzen, zum Beispiel durch das Umgehen von Datenschutzregeln zur effektiveren Fallbearbeitung.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RamakrishnanKalkuhlAhmadetal.2020,
  author    = {Ramakrishnan, Anjali and Kalkuhl, Matthias and Ahmad, Sohail and Creutzig, Felix},
  title     = {Keeping up with the Patels},
  series = {Energy research \& social science},
  volume    = {70},
  journal   = {Energy research \& social science},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2214-6296},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.erss.2020.101742},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {End-users base their consumption decisions not only on available budget and direct use value, but also on their social environment. The underlying social dynamics are particularly important in the case of consumer goods that implicate high future energy demand and are, hence, also key for climate mitigation. This paper investigates the impact of social factors, with a focus on 'status perceptions', on car and appliance ownerships by urban India households. Using two rounds of the household-level data from the India Human Development Survey (IHDS, 2005 and 2012), we test for the impact of social factors in addition to economic, demographic, locational, and housing on ownership levels. Starting with factor analysis to categorise appliances by their latent characteristics, we then apply the bivariate ordered probit model to identify drivers of consumption among the urban households. We find that while income and household demographics are predominant drivers of car and appliance uptake, the household's perception of status, instrumented by a variable measuring expenditure on conspicuous consumption, emerges as a key social dimension influencing the uptake. The results indicate how households identify themselves in society influences their corresponding car and appliance consumption. A deeper understanding of status-based consumption is, therefore, essential to designing better demand-side solutions to low carbon consumption.},
  language  = {en}
}