@article{Heimann2004,
  author    = {Heimann, Heinz-Dieter},
  title     = {Der 27. April 1449 oder : die Soester Fehde im Ged{\"a}chtnis der Stadt},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kroener2004,
  author    = {Kroener, Bernhard R.},
  title     = {Krieg und Karriere : geographische Mobilit{\"a}t als Voraussetzung soziale Aufstiegs in der milit{\"a}rischen Gesellschaft des 17. Jahrhunderts},
  isbn      = {3-89861- 365-8},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Kroener2004,
  author    = {Kroener, Bernhard R.},
  title     = {Die Nationale Volksarmee : eine "totale Institution"? : Versuche zu einer Innensicht der milit{\"a}rischen Gesellschaft in der DDR, Einleitung},
  series = {Milit{\"a}r, Staat und Gesellschaft in der DDR},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Milit{\"a}r, Staat und Gesellschaft in der DDR},
  publisher = {Links},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-86153-329-4},
  pages     = {740 S.},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Liebl2004,
  author    = {Liebl, Markus},
  title     = {Die j{\"u}dische Minderheit im baltischen Herzogtum von Kurland und Semgallen (1561-1795) : ihre Wahrnehmung durch die Umgebungsgesellschaften in einem st{\"a}ndisch gegliederten Staat},
  pages     = {LXXI, 315, 177 S.},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Barcelo2004,
  author    = {Barcel{\´o}, Pedro},
  title     = {Kleine r{\"o}mische Geschichte},
  publisher = {Wiss. Buchges},
  address   = {Darmstadt},
  isbn      = {3-534-17475-5},
  pages     = {167 S.},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{RiemerRiemer2005,
  author    = {Riemer, Ulrike and Riemer, Peter},
  title     = {Xenophobie - Philoxenie : vom Umgang mit Fremden in der Antike},
  series = {Potsdamer altertumswissenschaftliche Beitr{\"a}ge},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Potsdamer altertumswissenschaftliche Beitr{\"a}ge},
  editor    = {Barcel{\´o}, Pedro},
  publisher = {Steiner},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {3-515-08195-x},
  pages     = {276 S.},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schoeps2005,
  author    = {Schoeps, Julius H.},
  title     = {The (non)-assuming legacy : the debate on German-Jewish memorial culture},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {This essay shows how Jewish identity in pre-1933 Germany defined itself and how the widely known concept of German-Jewish symbiosis came into question after the organized murder of the European Jews. The search for a German- Jewish legacy in postwar Germany as well as in the countries in which the Jewish emigres found a new home will be explored. Moreover, the Eastern European cultural roots of Jews who migrated from Russia to Germany in the 1990s will also be discussed},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kunst2005,
  author    = {Kunst, Christiane},
  title     = {Ornamenta uxoria : badges of rank or jewellery of Roman wives?},
  editor    = {Juneja, Monica and Signori, Gabriela},
  issn      = {0971-9458},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {This article aims at a critical assessment of Roman jewellery and its social function. The literary sources in general take a moralising stance towards jewellery and the external appearance of women, particularly of those from families of the nobility. An analysis of legal and pictorial evidence shows that the ornamenta uxoria had more than a decorative function. They clearly indicated wealth, rank and merit. Furthermore, a change of junction from republican to imperial times can be detected: during the republic, a noblewoman's ornamenta were indicative of the status of her family (gens). Later, in imperial times, women were allowed ornamenta for individual merits (motherhood being first among them)},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kunst2005,
  author    = {Kunst, Christiane},
  title     = {Ornamenta uxoria. Badges of rank or jewellery of Roman wives?},
  issn      = {0971-9458},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {This article aims at a critical assessment of Roman jewellery and its social function. The literary sources in general take a moralising stance towards jewellery and the external appearance of women, particularly of those from families of the nobility. An analysis of legal and pictorial evidence shows that the ornamenta uxoria had more than a decorative function. They clearly indicated wealth, rank and merit. Furthermore, a change of junction from republican to imperial times can be detected: during the republic, a noblewoman's ornamenta were indicative of the status of her family (gens). Later, in imperial times, women were allowed ornamenta for individual merits (motherhood being first among them)},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Goese2005,
  author    = {G{\"o}se, Frank},
  title     = {The intellectual states at the end of the Ancient Empire : Essay on a balance sheet},
  issn      = {0044-2828},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}