@article{Kay2024,
  author    = {Kay, Alex James},
  title     = {The extermination of Red Army soldiers in German captivity, 1941-1945},
  series = {Journal of Slavic Military Studies},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Journal of Slavic Military Studies},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1556-3006},
  doi       = {10.1080/13518046.2024.2340839},
  pages     = {80 -- 104},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Captive Red Army soldiers made up the majority of victims of Nazi Germany's starvation policy against Soviet civilians and other non-combatants and thus constituted the largest single victim group of the German war of annihilation against the Soviet Union. Indeed, Soviet prisoners of war were the largest victim group of all National Socialist annihilation policies after the European Jews. Before the launch of Operation Barbarossa, it was clear to the Wehrmacht planning departments on exactly what scale they could expect to capture Soviet troops. Yet, they neglected to make the necessary preparations for feeding and sheltering the captured soldiers, who were viewed by the economic staffs and the military leadership alike as direct competitors of German troops and the German home front for precious food supplies. The number of extra mouths to feed was incompatible with German war aims. The obvious limitations on their freedom of movement and the relative ease with which large numbers could be segregated and their rations controlled were crucial factors in the death of over 3 million Soviet POWs, the vast majority directly or indirectly as a result of deliberate policies of neglect, undernourishment, and starvation while in the 'care' of the Wehrmacht. The most reliable figures for the mortality of Soviet POWs in German captivity reveal that up to 3.3 million died from a total of just over 5.7 million captured between June 1941 and February 1945 — a proportion of almost 58 percent. Of these, 2 million were already dead by the beginning of February 1942. In English, there is still neither a single monograph nor a single edited volume dedicated to the subject. This article now provides the first detailed stand-alone synthesis in that language addressing the whole period from 1941 to 1945.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{MahnckeZare2024,
  author    = {Mahncke-Zare, Naghme},
  title     = {Legitimiertes Unrecht},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-63549},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-635499},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {316},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Das Oberste Gericht der DDR war integraler Bestandteil der sozialistischen Staatsf{\"u}hrung und unterlag strengen Denk- und Organisationsstrukturen. Es war eng in die politische Agenda der SED eingebunden und genoss keinerlei Unabh{\"a}ngigkeit. Die Auslegung des DDR-Rechts durch das Gericht orientierte sich ausschließlich an den innen- und außenpolitischen Interessen der SED. Dies galt auch f{\"u}r die Rechtsprechung in F{\"a}llen der Republikflucht und ihrer gesetzlichen Vorl{\"a}ufer. Die h{\"o}chste Gerichtsinstanz im Staat war aktiv an der Gestaltung und Umsetzung der Strafjustiz gegen Republikfl{\"u}chtige beteiligt, was wesentlich zur Festigung der Herrschaftsgewalt der SED beitrug. Die vorliegende Untersuchung analysiert Urteile des Obersten Gerichts im historisch-politischen Kontext und zeigt auf, dass die Urteilspraxis ausschließlich im Interesse parteipolitischer Ziele handelte und weder dem Volk noch der eigentlichen Rechtsfindung verpflichtet war. Des Weiteren wird der maßgebliche Beitrag des Obersten Gerichts an der schrittweisen Kriminalisierung der B{\"u}rger der DDR beleuchtet. Dies wirft ein kritisches Licht auf die Rolle des Rechtssystems bei der Sicherung von Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Menschenrechten in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Kay2024,
  author    = {Kay, Alex James},
  title     = {Holocaust Research in Germany},
  series = {Hurb{\´a}n Foly{\´o}irat},
  volume    = {2},
  booktitle = {Hurb{\´a}n Foly{\´o}irat},
  publisher = {Holokauszt Eml{\´e}kk{\"o}zpont - Holocaust Memorial Center},
  address   = {Budapest},
  organization    = {Holocaust Documentation Center and Memorial Collection Public Foundation},
  issn      = {3004-023X},
  pages     = {22 -- 28},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DuevelEhmigMcCalletal.2024,
  author    = {D{\"u}vel, Pia and Ehmig, Ulrike and McCall, Jeremiah and Unceta G{\´o}mez, Luis and Bakogianni, Anastasia and Fischer, Jens and Serrano Lozano, David and Amb{\"u}hl, Annemarie and Matz, Alicia and Brinker, Wolfram and Mach, Jonas Konstantin and Mancini, Mattia and Werner, Eva},
  title     = {Spring Issue},
  series = {thersites},
  volume    = {2024},
  journal   = {thersites},
  number    = {18},
  editor    = {Amb{\"u}hl, Annemarie and Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Rollinger, Christian and Walde, Christine},
  issn      = {2364-7612},
  doi       = {10.34679/thersites.vol18},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{CarlaUhink2024,
  author    = {Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Authority and history: ancient models, modern questions / Bastos Marques, Juliana; Santangelo, Federico (Eds.). - London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. - 193 S. - ISBN 978-1-350-26944-6},
  series = {Historische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {318},
  journal   = {Historische Zeitschrift},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2196-680X},
  doi       = {https://doi.org/10.1515/hzhz-2024-1068},
  pages     = {398 -- 399},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{OPUS4-63119,
  title     = {Discursive Constructions of Corruption in Ancient Rome},
  series = {Cultural History},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cultural History},
  number    = {1},
  editor    = {Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Garc{\´i}a Morcillo, Marta},
  publisher = {Edinburgh University Press},
  address   = {Edinburgh},
  issn      = {2045-290X},
  doi       = {10.3366/cult.2024.0293},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CarlaUhinkGarciaMorcillo2024,
  author    = {Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Garc{\´i}a Morcillo, Marta},
  title     = {Discursive constructions of corruption in Ancient Rome},
  series = {Cultural History},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cultural History},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Edinburgh University Press},
  address   = {Edinburgh},
  issn      = {2045-290X},
  pages     = {1 -- 11},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CarlaUhink2024,
  author    = {Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo},
  title     = {'He had thoughtlessly accepted certain gifts'},
  series = {Cultural History},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cultural History},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Edinburgh University Press},
  address   = {Edinburgh},
  issn      = {2045-290X},
  pages     = {52 -- 70},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {It has been highlighted many times how difficult it is to draw a boundary between gift and bribe, and how the same transfer can be interpreted in different ways according to the position of the observer and the narrative frame into which it is inserted. This also applied of course to Ancient Rome; in both the Republic and Principate lawgivers tried to define the limits of acceptable transfers and thus also to identify what we might call 'corruption'. Yet, such definitions remained to a large extent blurred, and what was constructed was mostly a 'code of conduct', allowing Roman politicians to perform their own 'honesty' in public duty - while being aware at all times that their involvement in different kinds of transfer might be used by their opponents against them and presented as a case of 'corrupt' behaviour.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CarlaUhinkGarciaMorcillo2024,
  author    = {Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Garc{\´i}a Morcillo, Marta},
  title     = {Problemas y desaf{\´i}os de la investigaci{\´o}n hist{\´o}rica sobre la corrupci{\´o}n},
  series = {Eunom{\´i}a : Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Eunom{\´i}a : Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad},
  publisher = {Madrid},
  address   = {Universidad Carlos III de Madrid},
  issn      = {2253-6655},
  doi       = {https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2024.8506},
  pages     = {146 -- 164},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {El art{\´i}culo analiza la corrupci{\´o}n como un fen{\´o}meno complejo y con frecuencia ambiguo, relacionado con comportamientos y mentalidades individuales y colectivas, que son percibidos como ileg{\´i}timos o inmorales y, por lo tanto, desviados de normas establecidas. M{\´a}s all{\´a} de un acercamiento reduccionista u objetivista a lugares comunes de la corrupci{\´o}n pol{\´i}tica, o a delitos tipificados por la ley, esta contribuci{\´o}n pretende destacar la relevancia del an{\´a}lisis hist{\´o}rico del discurso en el estudio del tema. Este enfoque nos permite reconstruir contextos en los que se identifica la corrupci{\´o}n, as{\´i} como analizar relatos, no siempre un{\´a}nimes, sobre estas pr{\´a}cticas. El trabajo se adentra en una {\´e}poca lejana, pero a la vez cercana a nuestro tiempo, el {\´u}ltimo siglo la Rep{\´u}blica romana. La evidencia nos permite evaluar cr{\´i}ticamente aspectos fundamentales de la construcci{\´o}n ret{\´o}rica de la corrupci{\´o}n y de sus zonas grises, como la distinci{\´o}n, a menudo borrosa, entre regalo y soborno.},
  language  = {es}
}
@misc{Jass2024,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Jaß, Franz Ivan},
  title     = {Silent leges inter arma. Von der Tat bis zur Verurteilung},
  series = {Copia - Potsdamer Anregungen f{\"u}r den Lateinunterricht},
  journal   = {Copia - Potsdamer Anregungen f{\"u}r den Lateinunterricht},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2748-6621},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-62262},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-622627},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {48, 19},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Der Fall des T. Annius Milo bietet f{\"u}r den Lateinunterricht großes didaktisches Potenzial. Denn an seinem Beispiel kann die Lekt{\"u}re eines lateinischen Textes hervorragend mit realienkundlichen Aspekten verkn{\"u}pft und es k{\"o}nnen plausible Bez{\"u}ge zur Gegenwart hergestellt werden. Die vorliegende Masterarbeit zeigt, welch reiches Themenspektrum in Ciceros Rede Pro Milone steckt. Dazu z{\"a}hlen der historische Kontext des Falls, der Tatbestand des Mordes und der Ablauf des damaligen Gerichtsverfahrens. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wird das r{\"o}mische Recht mit dem heutzutage in Deutschland geltenden Strafrecht verglichen. Und zu guter Letzt wird hier die Glaubw{\"u}rdigkeit verschiedener schriftlicher Zeugnisse gepr{\"u}ft, insbesondere die Frage, ob die {\"u}berlieferte Rede das einstige Prozessgeschehen in authentischer Weise widerspiegelt.},
  language  = {de}
}