@article{Zimmermann2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {(Internationale) Strafverfolgung von Menschenrechtsverbrechen versus Friedenswahrung},
  isbn      = {978- 3-428-13933-0},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannSchniederjahn2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Schniederjahn, Nina},
  title     = {60 Jahre EMRK - Versuch einer Bilanz},
  series = {60 Jahre Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention : die Konvention als "living instrument" (Schriftenreihe des Menschenrechtszentrums der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam ; Bd. 38)},
  booktitle = {60 Jahre Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention : die Konvention als "living instrument" (Schriftenreihe des Menschenrechtszentrums der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam ; Bd. 38)},
  publisher = {Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-8305-3407-5},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {7 -- 19},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannHerrmann2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska},
  title     = {70 Jahre Genfer Fl{\"u}chtlingskonvention},
  series = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  journal   = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Luchterhand},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln ; Neuwied},
  issn      = {0174-2108},
  pages     = {221 -- 227},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2018,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {A victory for international rule of law?},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqy008},
  pages     = {19 -- 29},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {On 14 December 2017, the Assembly of States Parties of the Rome Statute decided to activate the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. In doing so, it however seems to have rescinded the Kampala amendment adopted in 2010, and in particular, the need for State Parties to eventually opt out from the Court's aggression-related jurisdiction. This reversal, while being more in line with the Rome Statute than the Kampala amendment itself, raises new (and old) and challenging legal questions which are highlighted in this article.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Abiding by and enforcing international humanitarian law in asymmetric warfare : the case of "operation cast lead"},
  issn      = {0554-498x},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2019,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa},
  title     = {Aggression under the Rome Statute},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-4678-1},
  pages     = {VII, 110},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Das Werk analysiert umfassend das Verbrechen der Aggression im Sinne des R{\"o}mischen Statuts. Ausgehend von der Rechtsgeschichte, werde die einschl{\"a}gigen Artikel 8bis, 15bis und 15ter des R{\"o}mischen Statuts, also die Definition des Verbrechens der Aggression, analysiert. Ebenso behandelt das Buch weiterf{\"u}hrende Entwicklungen des Verbrechens der Aggression {\"u}ber das Jahr 2017 hinaus - das Jahr, in dem es, wahrscheinlich, zu einer Entscheidung {\"u}ber die Aktivierung der Gerichtsbarkeit kommt},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GunnarssonZimmermann2012,
  author    = {Gunnarsson, Logi and Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Aktuelle Fragen des Menschenrechtsschutzes : 1. Potsdamer Menschenrechtstag am 26. Oktober 2011},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-196-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-60646},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Aus Anlass der Neubesetzung des Menschenrechtszentrums mit den Direktoren Prof. Dr. Andreas Zimmermann, LL.M. (Harvard) und Prof. Dr. Logi Gunnarsson fand am 26.10.2011 der Potsdamer Menschenrechtstag unter der Themenstellung „Aktuelle Fragen des Menschenrechtsschutzes" statt. Ganz im Sinne der interdisziplin{\"a}ren Ausrichtung des MenschenRechtsZentrums der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam besch{\"a}ftigten sich die beiden Direktoren in ihren Einf{\"u}hrungsvortr{\"a}gen aus ihrer jeweiligen Disziplin heraus mit philosophischen und rechtlichen Problemstellungen der Menschenrechte und ihres Schutzes.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GunnarsonWeissZimmermann2019,
  author    = {Gunnarson, Logi and Weiß, Norman and Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen - Fragen und m{\"o}gliche Antworten nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte},
  series = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen : eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte},
  journal   = {Akzeptanz und Wirksamkeit von Menschenrechtsvertr{\"a}gen : eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren Menschenrechtspakte},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-3761-1},
  pages     = {7 -- 14},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute : the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqs002},
  pages     = {209 -- 227},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {The adoption, in Kampala in June 2010, of amendments to the Rome Statute on the crime of aggression was hailed as a historic milestone in the development of the international Criminal Court (ICC). However, the manner in which these amendments are supposed to enter into force runs the risk of undermining the rules of the international law of treaties, as well as the legality and acceptability of the Kampala compromise itself The author examines the relevant amendment procedures provided for in the ICC Statute and the compatibility with them of the amendment procedure chosen in Kampala and ultimately warns of the legal consequences which may follow from the Review Conference's somewhat-Alexandrian solution.},
  language  = {en}
}