@article{KonczakVogel2005,
  author    = {Konczak, Kathrin and Vogel, Ralf},
  title     = {Abduction and Preferences in Linguistics},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KonczakVogel2005,
  author    = {Konczak, Kathrin and Vogel, Ralf},
  title     = {Abduction and preferences in linguistics : Extended abstract},
  issn      = {0302-9743},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FranselowSchlesewskyVogeletal.2011,
  author    = {Franselow, Gisbert and Schlesewsky, Matthias and Vogel, Ralf and Weskott, Thomas},
  title     = {Animacy effects on crossing wh-movement in German},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-93630},
  pages     = {657 -- 683},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {This article presents several acceptability rating experiments concerned with crossing wh-movement in German multiple questions. Our results show that there is no general superiority effect in German, thus refuting claims to the contrary by Featherston (2005). However, acceptability is reduced when a whphrase crosses a wh-subject with which it agrees in animacy. We explain this finding in terms of the availability of different sorting keys for the answers to the multiple questions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FanselowSchlesewskyVogeletal.2011,
  author    = {Fanselow, Gisbert and Schlesewsky, Matthias and Vogel, Ralf and Weskott, Thomas},
  title     = {Animacy effects on crossing wh-movement in German},
  series = {Linguistics : an interdisciplinary journal of the language sciences},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Linguistics : an interdisciplinary journal of the language sciences},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0024-3949},
  doi       = {10.1515/LING.2011.021},
  pages     = {657 -- 683},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {This article presents several acceptability rating experiments concerned with crossing wh-movement in German multiple questions. Our results show that there is no general superiority effect in German, thus refuting claims to the contrary by Featherston (2005). However, acceptability is reduced when a wh-phrase crosses a wh-subject with which it agrees in animacy. We explain this finding in terms of the availability of different sorting keys for the answers to the multiple questions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelZugck2003,
  author    = {Vogel, Ralf and Zugck, Marco},
  title     = {Counting Markedness},
  series = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-1857},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32476},
  pages     = {105 -- 122},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {This paper reports the results of a corpus investigation on case conflicts in German argument free relative constructions. We investigate how corpus frequencies reflect the relative markedness of free relative and correlative constructions, the relative markedness of different case conflict configurations, and the relative markedness of different conflict resolution strategies. Section 1 introduces the conception of markedness as used in Optimality Theory. Section 2 introduces the facts about German free relative clauses, and section 3 presents the results of the corpus study. By and large, markedness and frequency go hand in hand. However, configurations at the highest end of the markedness scale rarely show up in corpus data, and for the configuration at the lowest end we found an unexpected outcome: the more marked structure is preferred.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Vogel2004,
  author    = {Vogel, Ralf},
  title     = {Dialectal variation in German 3-verb clusters},
  series = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-1857},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32516},
  pages     = {83 -- 118},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Content: 1 The Typology 1.1 Object Placement 2 Treatment of StG in terms of LF Movement - with and without Head Movement 3 An OT-solution in terms of linearisation ('LF-to-PF-Mapping') 3.1 The trigger for additional orders: Focus 3.2 Competitions 3.3 Summary 4 RP 4.1 LF Movement - with and without Head Movement 4.2 The OT-account for RP 4.3 Competitions 5 Summary},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{FanselowFerySchlesewskyetal.2006,
  author    = {Fanselow, Gisbert and F{\´e}ry, Caroline and Schlesewsky, Matthias and Vogel, Ralf},
  title     = {Gradience in grammar : generative perspectives},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford, New York},
  isbn      = {0-19-927479-7},
  pages     = {416 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VogelFrisch2003,
  author    = {Vogel, Ralf and Frisch, Stefan},
  title     = {The resolution of case conflicts},
  series = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1616-7392},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32466},
  pages     = {91 -- 103},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {This paper reports the results of a pilot study on the resolution of case conflicts in German free relative constructions. Section 1 gives a brief introduction into the phenomenon, section 2 presents the experiment and its results, section 3 ends the paper with a brief more general discussion.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Vogel2006,
  author    = {Vogel, Ralf},
  title     = {The simple generator},
  series = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  journal   = {Linguistics in Potsdam},
  number    = {25},
  issn      = {1616-7392},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32338},
  pages     = {99 -- 136},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {I argue that the shift of explanatory burden from the generator to the evaluator in OT syntax - together with the difficulties that arise when we try to formulate a working theory of the interfaces of syntax - leads to a number of assumptions about syntactic structures in OT which are quite different from those typical of minimalist syntax: formal features, as driving forces behind syntactic movement, are useless, and derivational and representational economy are problematic for both empirical and conceptual reasons. The notion of markedness, central in Optimality Theory, is not fully compatible with the idea of synactic economy. Even more so, seemingly obvious cases of blocking by structural economy do not seem to result from grammar proper, but reflect (economical) aspects of language use.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Vogel2002,
  author    = {Vogel, Ralf},
  title     = {Yet another Theta-System},
  issn      = {0301-4428},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}