@article{Cruz2020, author = {Cruz, C{\´a}ndido Manuel Garc{\´i}a}, title = {Alexander von Humboldt y los f{\´o}siles inorg{\´a}nicos de las islas canarias}, series = {HiN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz ; international review for Humboldtian studies}, volume = {XXI}, journal = {HiN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz ; international review for Humboldtian studies}, number = {40}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {2568-3543}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-47349}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-473499}, pages = {15 -- 33}, year = {2020}, abstract = {En su breve visita a Canarias a finales del siglo XVIII, Alexander von Humboldt realiz{\´o} interesantes observaciones sobre la geolog{\´i}a de estas Islas. En relaci{\´o}n con los f{\´o}siles inorg{\´a}nicos, es decir, rocas y minerales, sus apreciaciones se enmarcan en sus estudios realizados en la Bergakademie de Freiberg, bajo la direcci{\´o}n de A. G. Werner, dentro del Neptunismo, y en sus experiencias en Am{\´e}rica e Italia. Aplic{\´o} en Canarias la universalidad de las formaciones geol{\´o}gicas wernerianas, algunas de las cuales crey{\´o}, err{\´o}neamente, haber observado en Tenerife, como la presencia de granitos o gneises. Humboldt estaba convencido de que el basalto era de origen volc{\´a}nico, y no se hab{\´i}a formado por precipitaci{\´o}n acuosa. Ser{\´i}a as{\´i} uno de los m{\´a}s influyentes desertores del Neptunismo, y suscit{\´o} la visita a Canarias de numerosos ge{\´o}logos a lo largo del siglo XIX.}, language = {es} } @article{Ette2020, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Escritura breve y estructura relacional}, series = {Vivir lo breve : nanofilolog{\´i}a y microformatos en las letras y culturas hisp{\´a}nicas contempor{\´a}neas}, journal = {Vivir lo breve : nanofilolog{\´i}a y microformatos en las letras y culturas hisp{\´a}nicas contempor{\´a}neas}, editor = {Ette, Ottmar and S{\´a}nchez, Yvette}, publisher = {Iberoamericana}, address = {Madrid}, isbn = {978-3-96869-038-4}, pages = {303 -- 339}, year = {2020}, language = {es} } @book{Ette2020, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Vivir lo breve}, series = {Ediciones de Iberoamericana ; 115}, journal = {Ediciones de Iberoamericana ; 115}, editor = {Ette, Ottmar and S{\´a}nchez, Yvette}, publisher = {Iberoamericana}, address = {Madrid}, isbn = {978-3-96869-038-4}, issn = {2567-9147}, pages = {415}, year = {2020}, abstract = {El volumen pone de relieve el impacto de los microformatos literarios y art{\´i}sticos en nuestro pensamiento, analizando aquellas manifestaciones que a diario buscan adiestrarnos en la lectura de textos ultracortos, cuyas dimensiones van del pajarillo de Twitter al program{\´a}tico dinosaurio. Re{\´u}ne veinte trabajos, firmados por renombrados nanofil{\´o}logos, cuyas reflexiones te{\´o}ricas sobre la clasificaci{\´o}n del g{\´e}nero y po{\´e}tica ponen de manifiesto una cosmovisi{\´o}n discontinua de la realidad as{\´i} como nuevas v{\´i}as de sensibilidad en la convivencia (y supervivencia) cotidiana, social y pol{\´i}tica. Otras diez contribuciones creativas, procedentes de las letras (por ejemplo, de la tuiteratura) y dem{\´a}s artes (una micropartitura para canto, grafiti, c{\´o}mic o micrometraje audiovisual), subrayan asimismo el br{\´i}o de las formas breves.}, language = {es} } @book{Ette2020, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Roland Barthes}, publisher = {Caj{\´o}n de sastre}, address = {Bogota}, isbn = {978-958-48-8719-1}, pages = {159}, year = {2020}, language = {es} } @article{Ette2020, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Mi primera lectura acad{\´e}mica}, series = {{\´A}labe : Revista de Investigaci{\´o}n sobre Lectura y Escritura}, journal = {{\´A}labe : Revista de Investigaci{\´o}n sobre Lectura y Escritura}, number = {22}, publisher = {Universidad de Almer{\´i}a}, address = {Almer{\´i}a}, issn = {2171-9624}, doi = {10.15645/Alabe2020.22.13}, pages = {4}, year = {2020}, language = {es} } @article{Ette2020, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Mi primera lectura acad{\´e}mica: "Mimesis", de Erich Auerbach}, series = {Alabe : Revista de Investigaci{\´o}n sobre Lectura y Escritura}, volume = {22}, journal = {Alabe : Revista de Investigaci{\´o}n sobre Lectura y Escritura}, number = {julio-diciembre}, issn = {2171-9624}, pages = {4}, year = {2020}, language = {es} } @article{Ette2020, author = {Ette, Ottmar}, title = {Siempre me ha ispirado horror pensar el mundo desde una sola perspectiva}, series = {Chuy : revista de estudios literarios latinoamericanos}, volume = {8}, journal = {Chuy : revista de estudios literarios latinoamericanos}, number = {julio}, publisher = {Universidad Nacional}, address = {Buenos Aires}, pages = {170 -- 176}, year = {2020}, language = {es} } @article{Hassler2020, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Pasigraf{\´i}a y antipasigraf{\´i}a a finales del siglo XVIII y a principios del siglo XIX}, volume = {41}, editor = {Calero Vaquerao, Mar{\´i}a Luisa}, publisher = {Infoling}, address = {Barcelona}, issn = {1139-8736}, pages = {169 -- 192}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In 1797 a rather short work appeared in Paris in two volumes, under the title Pasigraphie in both its French and German versions. The author, Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820), is said to have coined the term pasigraphie. With the invention of pasigraphy, Maimieux pursued the goal of creating a conceptually based writing system that could be applied to all languages. In this way, a text written in this script could be read in all languages. The pasigraphic system is based on an a priori system of conceptual classification to which written characters are assigned. It is therefore initially an exclusively written language, on which Maimieux two years later also built a spoken language with the Pasilalie. The first arguments against the endeavour represented by the Pasigraphie were brought forward by Maimieux' immediate contemporaries, the ideologues. These objections were re-affirmed in particular by Johann Severin Vater. The decisive difference between Maimieux and his critics lies in the determination of the role of signs in the formation of concepts. While for Maimieux the signs only name the finished concepts, his critics argued that signs have a function in the constitution of the concepts. A universal language is therefore ultimately not possible, since there are no universal concepts and the individual languages lead to different conceptual structures.}, language = {es} } @misc{Hassler2020, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {La integraci{\´o}n del concepto de «aspectualidad» en gram{\´a}ticas espa{\~n}olas}, series = {Reuni{\´o}n del Grupo Gram{\´a}tica descriptiva e historiograf{\´i}a de la gram{\´a}tica espa{\~n}ola (GramHisGram) (Salamanca, 21.-22. Februar 2020)}, journal = {Reuni{\´o}n del Grupo Gram{\´a}tica descriptiva e historiograf{\´i}a de la gram{\´a}tica espa{\~n}ola (GramHisGram) (Salamanca, 21.-22. Februar 2020)}, publisher = {Universidad de Salamanca}, address = {Salamanca}, year = {2020}, language = {es} } @article{Hennemann2020, author = {Hennemann, Anja}, title = {Tal vez es x vs. Tal ves sea X. Construcciones de probabilidad y el uso de los modos}, series = {Romanica Olomucensia}, volume = {32}, journal = {Romanica Olomucensia}, number = {1}, publisher = {Univerzita Palack{\´e}ho v Olomouci}, address = {Olomouc}, issn = {1803-4136}, doi = {10.5507/ro.2020.003}, pages = {51 -- 71}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This paper is concerned with constructions that express probability and their interaction with the indicative and subjunctive mood, as well as with other contextual elements. In detail, the paper deals with the constructions [sin duda + indicative/subjunctive], [tal vez + indicative/subjunctive], [probablemente + indicative/subjunctive] and [posiblemente + indicative/subjunctive]. In their interaction with mood, the constructions are understood as different microconstructions. For example, [sin duda + indicative] and [sin duda + subjunctive] are seen as different microconstructions of the superordinate mesoconstruction [modal construction (of probability) + verb]. In a qualitative analysis examples from the CREA, CORPES XXI, and CdE corpora are examined regarding the interaction of [expression of probability] + [mood]. Following the Principle of No Synonymy of Grammatical Forms, the analysis confirms that the use of mood additionally influences the expressed degree of probability of the constructions. For instance, while probablemente generally expresses a slightly higher probability than posiblemente, a fine-tuned analysis shows that the expressed degrees of probability of [probablemente + subjunctive] and [posiblemente + indicative] are highly similar. This is also often confirmed by further contextual information. In summary, the paper shows that Cognitive Construction Grammar is a very suitable background against which to investigate modal phenomena, as cognitive approaches generally deal with the ways in which language users conceptualize the world from their own point of view, and as expressions of modality, more precisely, probability, are also closely related to speakers' attitudes or perspectives.}, language = {es} }