@article{Faber2015,
  author    = {Faber, Eike},
  title     = {Zweimal Kyros},
  series = {Potestas : revista de estudios del mundo cl{\´a}sico e historia del arte},
  journal   = {Potestas : revista de estudios del mundo cl{\´a}sico e historia del arte},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Universitat Jaume I},
  address   = {Castell{\´o}n},
  issn      = {1888-9867},
  doi       = {10.6035/potestas.2015.8.2},
  pages     = {37 -- 56},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {«Kyros» taucht als F{\"u}rstenname dreimal in der {\"U}berlieferung des Perserreiches auf. Der Historiker Xenophon von Athen (427-ca. 355 v. Chr.) hat in seinen Schriften {\"u}ber zwei Tr{\"a}ger dieses Namens berichtet und sie durchaus unterschiedlich bewertet: Kyros II. («der Große»), Mehrer des Reiches, sowie ein Jahrhundert sp{\"a}ter Kyros, Sohn des Dareios und j{\"u}ngerer Bruder des Perserk{\"o}nigs Artaxerxes II. Der {\"a}ltere Kyros ist namengebender Protagonist eines F{\"u}rstenspiegels (der Kyrop{\"a}die), wird also grunds{\"a}tzlich positiv und als ein Vorbild f{\"u}r andere dargestellt. Am erfolglosen Kampf des j{\"u}ngeren Kyros um die Krone des Perserreichs hatte Xenophon als Offizier griechischer S{\"o}ldner selbst teilgenommen. Aus dem Vergleich von Darstellung und Bewertung der beiden F{\"u}rsten lassen sich die Anspr{\"u}che Xenophons an einen idealen Herrscher ableiten, was hier unternommen werden soll. Zugleich erm{\"o}glichen diese Ergebnisse, Xenophon als Historiker und politischen Denker in der zeitgen{\"o}ssischen Debatte um die beste Staatsform einzubetten.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Lottes2015,
  author    = {Lottes, G{\"u}nther},
  title     = {Human Rights vs. the Idea of Progress. Well-Hidden Contradictions in Meang Well},
  series = {Humanismus und Antikerezeption im 18. Jahrhundert : Band 3 Humanism and Revolution},
  journal   = {Humanismus und Antikerezeption im 18. Jahrhundert : Band 3 Humanism and Revolution},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  isbn      = {978-3-8253-5722-1},
  pages     = {129 -- 142},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GieseDoering2015,
  author    = {Giese, Martina and D{\"o}ring, Karoline},
  title     = {Der Briefbericht des Frater Simon {\"u}ber den Fall von Konstantinopel 1453},
  series = {Byzantinische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {Byzantinische Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1868-9027},
  doi       = {10.1515/bz-2015-0005},
  pages     = {79 -- 114},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Although claiming the authority of an eye-witness account, frater Simon's letter is almost certainly a ficticious description of the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453. This presumed lack of authenticity has obviously prompted modern scholarship for a long time to be oblivious to this contemporary and exclusive source on the events, preferring well-known and reliable sources such as Leonard of Chios and Isidore of Kiev. However, since frater Simon's letter has survived in two different versions and ten manuscripts from the 15th century, it is clearly more than a marginal note. Rather is it a remarkable contribution to the literary treatment of the Turkish threat and timeless moral instruction.With his portrayal of the pagan Mehmed II as a just ruler, the recurring moral instructions and the lack of a call to arms. Simon's text stands out against themyriad of more or less contemporary depictions. In preparation for a critical edition the paper gives an analysis of the text and an overview of the extant manuscripts.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Baehrens2015,
  author    = {Baehrens, Konstantin},
  title     = {Einleitung zu Georg Luk{\´a}cs},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie},
  volume    = {63},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2192-1482},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2015-0019},
  pages     = {358 -- 366},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Two short typescripts by G. Lukacs from the archive, dating from 1941/42, shed light on his appraisal of the cultural 'inner reserves' of Germany and the 'moral reserves' of the democracies involved in the Second World War, as well as on Lukacs's political philosophy at that time. The conception of an intrinsic interrelation of a humanist philosophical anthropology and rationalist epistemology elucidates his egalitarian and democratic account. Both texts are located within the intellectual development of the author in an introduction by the editor, which sketches the historical background and indicates relevant contemporaneous theoretical and political debates, such as the controversies over realism and humanism and also a dispute with K. Jaspers on German collective guilt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Koeppen2015,
  author    = {K{\"o}ppen, Paul},
  title     = {Weil nicht wahr sein kann, was nicht wahr sein darf},
  series = {Vierteljahrshefte f{\"u}r Zeitgeschichte},
  volume    = {63},
  journal   = {Vierteljahrshefte f{\"u}r Zeitgeschichte},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2196-7121},
  doi       = {10.1515/vfzg-2015-0034},
  pages     = {569 -- 579},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Die Debatte geht weiter: Gab es 1930/31 ernst zu nehmende Kreditangebote der franz{\"o}sischen Regierung an das Deutsche Reich? Vers{\"a}umte es die Reichsregierung unter Kanzler Heinrich Br{\"u}ning aus politisch- revisionistischem Kalk{\"u}l heraus bewusst, diese Angebote auszuloten? War die eiserne Sparpolitik der ersten beiden Pr{\"a}sidialkabinette also nicht die alternativlose Konsequenz {\"o}konomischer Zw{\"a}nge, sondern die logische Folge davon unabh{\"a}ngiger außen- und gesellschaftspolitischer Pr{\"a}missen? Paul K{\"o}ppen, der diese Debatte im Juli 2014 in den Vierteljahrsheften f{\"u}r Zeitgeschichte er{\"o}ffnet hat, antwortet seinen Kritikern, pr{\"a}zisiert seine Argumentation und stellt seine Thesen in den weiteren Kontext der aktuellen Diskussion um die Chancen und Belastungen der Zeit zwischen den Weltkriegen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Boesch2015,
  author    = {B{\"o}sch, Frank},
  title     = {Zwischen Schah und Khomeini},
  series = {Vierteljahrshefte f{\"u}r Zeitgeschichte},
  volume    = {63},
  journal   = {Vierteljahrshefte f{\"u}r Zeitgeschichte},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2196-7121},
  doi       = {10.1515/vfzg-2015-0020},
  pages     = {319 -- 350},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {1978/79 fegte eine Revolution das Regime von Schah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi im Iran hinweg - eine islamische Revolution, an deren Ende ein Gottesstaat unter F{\"u}hrung der Geistlichkeit stand, mit Ayatollah Khomeini an der Spitze. Die Bundesregierung unter Kanzler Helmut Schmidt und Außenminister Hans-Dietrich Genscher befand sich in einer Zwickm{\"u}hle: Einerseits war der Iran ein wichtiger Erd{\"o}llieferant und Handelspartner, andererseits verst{\"o}rte die Gewalt gegen politische Gegner und Vertreter der westlichen Staatengemeinschaft, die in der Besetzung der amerikanischen Botschaft in Teheran gipfelte. Frank B{\"o}sch zeigt auf der Basis neuer Quellen, wie die Bundesregierung auf die islamische Revolution reagierte, zwischen interessengeleitetem Pragmatismus und außenpolitisch gebotener B{\"u}ndnistreue zu den USA lavierte und so hinter den Kulissen als Vermittler zwischen Teheran und Washington fungieren konnte.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Mackenbach2015,
  author    = {Mackenbach, Werner},
  title     = {History, memory and fiction. Tyrant memory by Horacio Castellanos Moya},
  series = {Ayer : revista de historia contempor{\´a}nea},
  journal   = {Ayer : revista de historia contempor{\´a}nea},
  number    = {97},
  publisher = {Asociaci{\´o}n de Historia Contempor{\´a}nea},
  address   = {Madrid},
  issn      = {1134-2277},
  pages     = {83 -- 111},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Brechenmacher2015,
  author    = {Brechenmacher, Thomas},
  title     = {Jewish history in early modern and modern Europe as a history of migrations},
  series = {Historisches Jahrbuch},
  volume    = {135},
  journal   = {Historisches Jahrbuch},
  publisher = {Alber},
  address   = {Freiburg Breisgau},
  issn      = {0018-2621},
  pages     = {27 -- 45},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The article describes the history of Jews in Europe from the end of the Middle Ages until the aftermath of the Second World War as a sequence of migrational processes. It thereby demonstrates how the migration paradigm can contribute to a comprehensive understanding of European Jewish history during the given period by better explaining the various types of settlement, as well as other central phenomena of Jewish existence, such as inclusion/exclusion, assimilation/acculturation, and anti-Semitism. The article tries to assess the significance of the "religious factor" within the complex interdependencies between so-called "push" and "pull" factors that determined the individual migrations. In most cases, religious motives played only a minor role, while economic factors tended to dominate, particularly in regard to the functions Jews, as members of a minority, were permitted to carry out in the context of non-Jewish majority societies.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Heimann2015,
  author    = {Heimann, Heinz-Dieter},
  title     = {Non-Christians during the middle ages and reformation},
  series = {Historisches Jahrbuch},
  volume    = {135},
  journal   = {Historisches Jahrbuch},
  publisher = {Alber},
  address   = {Freiburg Breisgau},
  issn      = {0018-2621},
  pages     = {9 -- 26},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {As an example of migration of the Franciscans, this article pursues the effects of their idea of mission: acquisition and transfer of knowledge concerning non-Christians in the communication of missionaries, using the examples of journeys to Mongolia or the encounter with indigenous peoples in the New World (Aztecs). These friars wanted to teach non-Christians rather than subjugate them. The context of religion and migration resulted in a "boom" of inculturation. And the same context shows the way the Franciscans claimed their identity as well as their struggle, how Franciscans connected pastoral care with recognition of the cultural and religious plurality of Christendom. They embodied what it could mean to say: "our monastery is the world".},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schoeps2015,
  author    = {Schoeps, Julius H.},
  title     = {Had Hitler still managed to win at the End? Europe's Jews between Shoa Restructuring and new Dangers},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Religions- und Geistesgeschichte},
  volume    = {67},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Religions- und Geistesgeschichte},
  number    = {3-4},
  publisher = {Brill},
  address   = {Leiden},
  issn      = {0044-3441},
  pages     = {244 -- 258},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}