@article{EccardMendesFerreiraPeredoArceetal.2022,
  author    = {Eccard, Jana and Mendes Ferreira, Clara and Peredo Arce, Andres and Dammhahn, Melanie},
  title     = {Top-down effects of foraging decisions on local, landscape and regional biodiversity of resources (DivGUD)},
  series = {Ecology letters},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Ecology letters},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford [u.a.]},
  issn      = {1461-0248},
  doi       = {10.1111/ele.13901},
  pages     = {3 -- 16},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Foraging by consumers acts as a biotic filtering mechanism for biodiversity at the trophic level of resources. Variation in foraging behaviour has cascading effects on abundance, diversity, and functional trait composition of the community of resource species. Here we propose diversity at giving-up density (DivGUD), i.e. when foragers quit exploiting a patch, as a novel concept and simple measure quantifying cascading effects at multiple spatial scales. In experimental landscapes with an assemblage of plant seeds, patch residency of wild rodents decreased local alpha-DivGUD (via elevated mortality of species with large seeds) and regional gamma-DivGUD, while dissimilarity among patches in a landscape (beta-DivGUD) increased. By linking theories of adaptive foraging behaviour with community ecology, DivGUD allows to investigate cascading indirect predation effects, e.g. the ecology-of-fear framework, feedbacks between functional trait composition of resource species and consumer communities, and effects of inter-individual differences among foragers on the biodiversity of resource communities.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{MendesFerreira2023,
  author    = {Mendes Ferreira, Clara},
  title     = {Indirect, tri-trophic effects of fear on biodiversity},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-61102},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-611020},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {119},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Predator-forager interactions are a major factor in evolutionary adaptation of many species, as predators need to gain energy by consuming prey species, and foragers needs to avoid the worst fate of mortality while still consuming resources for energetic gains. In this evolutionary arms race, the foragers have constantly evolved anti-predator behaviours (e.g. foraging activity changes). To describe all these complex changes, researchers developed the framework of the landscape of fear, that is, the spatio-temporal variation of perceived predation risk. This concept simplifies all the involved ecological processes into one framework, by integrating animal biology and distribution with habitat characteristics. Researchers can then evaluate the perception of predation risk in prey species, what are the behavioural responses of the prey and, therefore, understand the cascading effects of landscapes of fear at the resource levels (tri-trophic effects). Although tri-trophic effects are well studied at the predator-prey interaction level, little is known on how the forager-resource interactions are part of the overall cascading effects of landscapes of fear, despite the changes of forager feeding behaviour - that occur with perceived predation risk - affecting directly the level of the resources. This thesis aimed to evaluate the cascading effects of the landscape of fear on biodiversity of resources, and how the feeding behaviour and movement of foragers shaped the final resource species composition (potential coexistence mechanisms). We studied the changes caused by landscapes of fear on wild and captive rodent communities and evaluated: the cascading effects of different landscapes of fear on a tri-trophic system (I), the effects of fear on a forager's movement patterns and dietary preferences (II) and cascading effects of different types of predation risk (terrestrial versus avian, III). In Chapter I, we applied a novel measure to evaluate the cascading effects of fear at the level of resources, by quantifying the diversity of resources left after the foragers gave-up on foraging (diversity at the giving-up density). We tested the measure at different spatial levels (local and regional) and observed that with decreased perceived predation risk, the density and biodiversity of resources also decreased. Foragers left a very dissimilar community of resources based on perceived risk and resources functional traits, and therefore acted as an equalising mechanism. In Chapter II, we wanted to understand further the decision-making processes of rodents in different landscapes of fear, namely, in which resource species rodents decided to forage on (based on three functional traits: size, nutrients and shape) and how they moved depending on perceived predation risk. In safe landscapes, individuals increased their feeding activity and movements and despite the increased costs, they visited more often patches that were further away from their central-place. Despite a preference for the bigger resources regardless of risk, when perceived predation risk was low, individuals changed their preference to fat-rich resources. In Chapter III, we evaluated the cascading effects of two different types of predation risk in rodents: terrestrial (raccoon) versus avian predation risk. Raccoon presence or absence did not alter the rodents feeding behaviour in different landscapes of fear. Rodent's showed risk avoidance behaviours towards avian predators (spatial risk avoidance), but not towards raccoons (lack of temporal risk avoidance). By analysing the effects of fear in tri-trophic systems, we were able to deepen the knowledge of how non-consumptive effects of predators affect the behaviour of foragers, and quantitatively measure the cascading effects at the level of resources with a novel measure. Foragers are at the core of the ecological processes and responses to the landscape of fear, acting as variable coexistence agents for resource species depending on perceived predation risk. This newly found measures and knowledge can be applied to more trophic chains, and inform researchers on biodiversity patterns originating from landscapes of fear.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MooijTrolleJeppesenetal.2010,
  author    = {Mooij, Wolf M. and Trolle, Dennis and Jeppesen, Erik and Arhonditsis, George B. and Belolipetsky, Pavel V. and Chitamwebwa, Deonatus B. R. and Degermendzhy, Andrey G. and DeAngelis, Donald L. and Domis, Lisette Nicole de Senerpont and Downing, Andrea S. and Elliott, J. Alex and Fragoso Jr, Carlos Ruberto and Gaedke, Ursula and Genova, Svetlana N. and Gulati, Ramesh D. and H{\aa}kanson, Lars and Hamilton, David P. and Hipsey, Matthew R. and 't Hoen, Jochem and H{\"u}lsmann, Stephan and Los, F. Hans and Makler-Pick, Vardit and Petzoldt, Thomas and Prokopkin, Igor G. and Rinke, Karsten and Schep, Sebastiaan A. and Tominaga, Koji and Van Dam, Anne A. and Van Nes, Egbert H. and Wells, Scott A. and Janse, Jan H.},
  title     = {Challenges and opportunities for integrating lake ecosystem modelling approaches},
  series = {Aquatic ecology},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Aquatic ecology},
  publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1573-5125},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10452-010-9339-3},
  pages     = {633 -- 667},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {A large number and wide variety of lake ecosystem models have been developed and published during the past four decades. We identify two challenges for making further progress in this field. One such challenge is to avoid developing more models largely following the concept of others ('reinventing the wheel'). The other challenge is to avoid focusing on only one type of model, while ignoring new and diverse approaches that have become available ('having tunnel vision'). In this paper, we aim at improving the awareness of existing models and knowledge of concurrent approaches in lake ecosystem modelling, without covering all possible model tools and avenues. First, we present a broad variety of modelling approaches. To illustrate these approaches, we give brief descriptions of rather arbitrarily selected sets of specific models. We deal with static models (steady state and regression models), complex dynamic models (CAEDYM, CE-QUAL-W2, Delft 3D-ECO, LakeMab, LakeWeb, MyLake, PCLake, PROTECH, SALMO), structurally dynamic models and minimal dynamic models. We also discuss a group of approaches that could all be classified as individual based: super-individual models (Piscator, Charisma), physiologically structured models, stage-structured models and traitbased models. We briefly mention genetic algorithms, neural networks, Kalman filters and fuzzy logic. Thereafter, we zoom in, as an in-depth example, on the multi-decadal development and application of the lake ecosystem model PCLake and related models (PCLake Metamodel, Lake Shira Model, IPH-TRIM3D-PCLake). In the discussion, we argue that while the historical development of each approach and model is understandable given its 'leading principle', there are many opportunities for combining approaches. We take the point of view that a single 'right' approach does not exist and should not be strived for. Instead, multiple modelling approaches, applied concurrently to a given problem, can help develop an integrative view on the functioning of lake ecosystems. We end with a set of specific recommendations that may be of help in the further development of lake ecosystem models.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{MooijTrolleJeppesenetal.2010,
  author    = {Mooij, Wolf M. and Trolle, Dennis and Jeppesen, Erik and Arhonditsis, George B. and Belolipetsky, Pavel V. and Chitamwebwa, Deonatus B. R. and Degermendzhy, Andrey G. and DeAngelis, Donald L. and Domis, Lisette Nicole de Senerpont and Downing, Andrea S. and Elliott, J. Alex and Fragoso Jr., Carlos Ruberto and Gaedke, Ursula and Genova, Svetlana N. and Gulati, Ramesh D. and H{\aa}kanson, Lars and Hamilton, David P. and Hipsey, Matthew R. and 't Hoen, Jochem and H{\"u}lsmann, Stephan and Los, F. Hans and Makler-Pick, Vardit and Petzoldt, Thomas and Prokopkin, Igor G. and Rinke, Karsten and Schep, Sebastiaan A. and Tominaga, Koji and Van Dam, Anne A. and Van Nes, Egbert H. and Wells, Scott A. and Janse, Jan H.},
  title     = {Challenges and opportunities for integrating lake ecosystem modelling approaches},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {1326},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42983},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-429839},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {A large number and wide variety of lake ecosystem models have been developed and published during the past four decades. We identify two challenges for making further progress in this field. One such challenge is to avoid developing more models largely following the concept of others ('reinventing the wheel'). The other challenge is to avoid focusing on only one type of model, while ignoring new and diverse approaches that have become available ('having tunnel vision'). In this paper, we aim at improving the awareness of existing models and knowledge of concurrent approaches in lake ecosystem modelling, without covering all possible model tools and avenues. First, we present a broad variety of modelling approaches. To illustrate these approaches, we give brief descriptions of rather arbitrarily selected sets of specific models. We deal with static models (steady state and regression models), complex dynamic models (CAEDYM, CE-QUAL-W2, Delft 3D-ECO, LakeMab, LakeWeb, MyLake, PCLake, PROTECH, SALMO), structurally dynamic models and minimal dynamic models. We also discuss a group of approaches that could all be classified as individual based: super-individual models (Piscator, Charisma), physiologically structured models, stage-structured models and traitbased models. We briefly mention genetic algorithms, neural networks, Kalman filters and fuzzy logic. Thereafter, we zoom in, as an in-depth example, on the multi-decadal development and application of the lake ecosystem model PCLake and related models (PCLake Metamodel, Lake Shira Model, IPH-TRIM3D-PCLake). In the discussion, we argue that while the historical development of each approach and model is understandable given its 'leading principle', there are many opportunities for combining approaches. We take the point of view that a single 'right' approach does not exist and should not be strived for. Instead, multiple modelling approaches, applied concurrently to a given problem, can help develop an integrative view on the functioning of lake ecosystems. We end with a set of specific recommendations that may be of help in the further development of lake ecosystem models.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Eccard2022,
  author    = {Eccard, Jana},
  title     = {Can rolling composite wildflower blocks increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes better than wildflowers strips?},
  series = {Journal of applied ecology : an official journal of the British Ecological Society},
  volume    = {59},
  journal   = {Journal of applied ecology : an official journal of the British Ecological Society},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0021-8901},
  doi       = {10.1111/1365-2664.14147},
  pages     = {1172 -- 1177},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Biodiversity and abundance of wildlife has dramatically declined in agricultural landscapes. Sown, short-lived wildflower (WF) strips along the margins of crop fields are a widespread and often subsidised in agri-environmental schemes, intended to enhance biodiversity, provide refuges for wild plant and arthropod populations and to provide ecosystem services to crops. Meanwhile, WF elements are also criticised, since their functionality decreases with plant succession, the removal of aged WF strip poses an ecological trap for the attracted arthropod populations and only common and mobile species benefit. Further, insects in WF strips are impacted by pesticides from agricultural fields due to shared boundaries with crop fields and by edge effects. The performance of the measure could be improved by combining several WF strips of different successional stages, each harbouring a unique community of plants and arthropods, into persistent, composite WF block, where successional stages exist in parallel. Monitoring data on many taxa in the literature shows, that a third of species are temporarily present in an ageing WF stip, thus offering composite WF blocks should increase cumulative species richness by 28\%-39\% compared to annual richness in WF strips. Persistence of composite WF blocks would offer reliable refuge for animal and plant populations, also supporting their predators and herbivores. Further, WF blocks have less boundaries to crops compared to WF strips of the same area, and are less impacted by edge effects and pesticides. Policy implications. Here I suggest a change of conservation practice changing from successional WF strips to composite WF blocks. By regular removal and replacement of aged WF strips either within the block (rotational) or at its margins (rolling), the habitat heterogeneity in composite WF block could be perpetuated. Rolling composite WF blocks change locations over years, and the original location can be reconverted to arable land while a nearby WF block is still available to wildlife. A change in agricultural schemes would be necessary, since in some European countries clustered WF strips are explicitly not subsidised.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Guill2022,
  author    = {Guill, Christian},
  title     = {Structure, stability and functioning of food webs},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56115},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-561153},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {250},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In this thesis, a collection of studies is presented that advance research on complex food webs in several directions. Food webs, as the networks of predator-prey interactions in ecosystems, are responsible for distributing the resources every organism needs to stay alive. They are thus central to our understanding of the mechanisms that support biodiversity, which in the face of increasing severity of anthropogenic global change and accelerated species loss is of highest importance, not least for our own well-being. The studies in the first part of the thesis are concerned with general mechanisms that determine the structure and stability of food webs. It is shown how the allometric scaling of metabolic rates with the species' body masses supports their persistence in size-structured food webs (where predators are larger than their prey), and how this interacts with the adaptive adjustment of foraging efforts by consumer species to create stable food webs with a large number of coexisting species. The importance of the master trait body mass for structuring communities is further exemplified by demonstrating that the specific way the body masses of species engaging in empirically documented predator-prey interactions affect the predator's feeding rate dampens population oscillations, thereby helping both species to survive. In the first part of the thesis it is also shown that in order to understand certain phenomena of population dynamics, it may be necessary to not only take the interactions of a focal species with other species into account, but to also consider the internal structure of the population. This can refer for example to different abundances of age cohorts or developmental stages, or the way individuals of different age or stage interact with other species. Building on these general insights, the second part of the thesis is devoted to exploring the consequences of anthropogenic global change on the persistence of species. It is first shown that warming decreases diversity in size-structured food webs. This is due to starvation of large predators on higher trophic levels, which suffer from a mismatch between their respiration and ingestion rates when temperature increases. In host-parasitoid networks, which are not size-structured, warming does not have these negative effects, but eutrophication destabilises the systems by inducing detrimental population oscillations. In further studies, the effect of habitat change is addressed. On the level of individual patches, increasing isolation of habitat patches has a similar effect as warming, as it leads to decreasing diversity due to the extinction of predators on higher trophic levels. In this case it is caused by dispersal mortality of smaller and therefore less mobile species on lower trophic levels, meaning that an increasing fraction of their biomass production is lost to the inhospitable matrix surrounding the habitat patches as they become more isolated. It is further shown that increasing habitat isolation desynchronises population oscillations between the patches, which in itself helps species to persist by dampening fluctuations on the landscape level. However, this is counteracted by an increasing strength of local population oscillations fuelled by an indirect effect of dispersal mortality on the feeding interactions. Last, a study is presented that introduces a novel mechanism for supporting diversity in metacommunities. It builds on the self-organised formation of spatial biomass patterns in the landscape, which leads to the emergence of spatio-temporally varying selection pressures that keep local communities permanently out of equilibrium and force them to continuously adapt. Because this mechanism relies on the spatial extension of the metacommunity, it is also sensitive to habitat change. In the third part of the thesis, the consequences of biodiversity for the functioning of ecosystems are explored. The studies focus on standing stock biomass, biomass production, and trophic transfer efficiency as ecosystem functions. It is first shown that increasing the diversity of animal communities increases the total rate of intra-guild predation. However, the total biomass stock of the animal communities increases nevertheless, which also increases their exploitative pressure on the underlying plant communities. Despite this, the plant communities can maintain their standing stock biomass due to a shift of the body size spectra of both animal and plant communities towards larger species with a lower specific respiration rate. In another study it is further demonstrated that the generally positive relationship between diversity and the above mentioned ecosystem functions becomes steeper when not only the feeding interactions but also the numerous non-trophic interactions (like predator interference or competition for space) between the species of an ecosystem are taken into account. Finally, two studies are presented that demonstrate the power of functional diversity as explanatory variable. It is interpreted as the range spanned by functional traits of the species that determine their interactions. This approach allows to mechanistically understand how the ecosystem functioning of food webs with multiple trophic levels is affected by all parts of the food web and why a high functional diversity is required for efficient transportation of energy from primary producers to the top predators. The general discussion draws some synthesising conclusions, e.g. on the predictive power of ecosystem functioning to explain diversity, and provides an outlook on future research directions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EstendorferStempfhuberHauryetal.2017,
  author    = {Estendorfer, Jennifer and Stempfhuber, Barbara and Haury, Paula and Vestergaard, Gisle and Rillig, Matthias C. and Joshi, Jasmin Radha and Schr{\"o}der, Peter and Schloter, Michael},
  title     = {The Influence of Land Use Intensity on the Plant-Associated Microbiome of Dactylis glomerata L.},
  series = {Frontiers in plant science},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in plant science},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-462X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpls.2017.00930},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In this study, we investigated the impact of different land use intensities (LUI) on the root-associated microbiome of Dactylis glomerata (orchardgrass). For this purpose, eight sampling sites with different land use intensity levels but comparable soil properties were selected in the southwest of Germany. Experimental plots covered land use levels from natural grassland up to intensively managed meadows. We used 16S rRNA gene based barcoding to assess the plant-associated community structure in the endosphere, rhizosphere and bulk soil of D. glomerata. Samples were taken at the reproductive stage of the plant in early summer. Our data indicated that roots harbor a distinct bacterial community, which clearly differed from the microbiome of the rhizosphere and bulk soil. Our results revealed Pseudomonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Comamonadaceae as the most abundant endophytes independently of land use intensity. Rhizosphere and bulk soil were dominated also by Proteobacteria, but the most abundant families differed from those obtained from root samples. In the soil, the effect of land use intensity was more pronounced compared to root endophytes leading to a clearly distinct pattern of bacterial communities under different LUI from rhizosphere and bulk soil vs. endophytes. Overall, a change of community structure on the plant-soil interface was observed, as the number of shared OTUs between all three compartments investigated increased with decreasing land use intensity. Thus, our findings suggest a stronger interaction of the plant with its surrounding soil under low land use intensity. Furthermore, the amount and quality of available nitrogen was identified as a major driver for shifts in the microbiome structure in all compartments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DenglerWagnerDembiczetal.2018,
  author    = {Dengler, J{\"u}rgen and Wagner, Viktoria and Dembicz, Iwona and Garcia-Mijangos, Itziar and Naqinezhad, Alireza and Boch, Steffen and Chiarucci, Alessandro and Conradi, Timo and Filibeck, Goffredo and Guarino, Riccardo and Janisova, Monika and Steinbauer, Manuel J. and Acic, Svetlana and Acosta, Alicia T. R. and Akasaka, Munemitsu and Allers, Marc-Andre and Apostolova, Iva and Axmanova, Irena and Bakan, Branko and Baranova, Alina and Bardy-Durchhalter, Manfred and Bartha, Sandor and Baumann, Esther and Becker, Thomas and Becker, Ute and Belonovskaya, Elena and Bengtsson, Karin and Benito Alonso, Jose Luis and Berastegi, Asun and Bergamini, Ariel and Bonini, Ilaria and Bruun, Hans Henrik and Budzhak, Vasyl and Bueno, Alvaro and Antonio Campos, Juan and Cancellieri, Laura and Carboni, Marta and Chocarro, Cristina and Conti, Luisa and Czarniecka-Wiera, Marta and De Frenne, Pieter and Deak, Balazs and Didukh, Yakiv P. and Diekmann, Martin and Dolnik, Christian and Dupre, Cecilia and Ecker, Klaus and Ermakov, Nikolai and Erschbamer, Brigitta and Escudero, Adrian and Etayo, Javier and Fajmonova, Zuzana and Felde, Vivian A. and Fernandez Calzado, Maria Rosa and Finckh, Manfred and Fotiadis, Georgios and Fracchiolla, Mariano and Ganeva, Anna and Garcia-Magro, Daniel and Gavilan, Rosario G. and Germany, Markus and Giladi, Itamar and Gillet, Francois and Giusso del Galdo, Gian Pietro and Gonzalez, Jose M. and Grytnes, John-Arvid and Hajek, Michal and Hajkova, Petra and Helm, Aveliina and Herrera, Mercedes and Hettenbergerova, Eva and Hobohm, Carsten and Huellbusch, Elisabeth M. and Ingerpuu, Nele and Jandt, Ute and Jeltsch, Florian and Jensen, Kai and Jentsch, Anke and Jeschke, Michael and Jimenez-Alfaro, Borja and Kacki, Zygmunt and Kakinuma, Kaoru and Kapfer, Jutta and Kavgaci, Ali and Kelemen, Andras and Kiehl, Kathrin and Koyama, Asuka and Koyanagi, Tomoyo F. and Kozub, Lukasz and Kuzemko, Anna and Kyrkjeeide, Magni Olsen and Landi, Sara and Langer, Nancy and Lastrucci, Lorenzo and Lazzaro, Lorenzo and Lelli, Chiara and Leps, Jan and Loebel, Swantje and Luzuriaga, Arantzazu L. and Maccherini, Simona and Magnes, Martin and Malicki, Marek and Marceno, Corrado and Mardari, Constantin and Mauchamp, Leslie and May, Felix and Michelsen, Ottar and Mesa, Joaquin Molero and Molnar, Zsolt and Moysiyenko, Ivan Y. and Nakaga, Yuko K. and Natcheva, Rayna and Noroozi, Jalil and Pakeman, Robin J. and Palpurina, Salza and Partel, Meelis and Paetsch, Ricarda and Pauli, Harald and Pedashenko, Hristo and Peet, Robert K. and Pielech, Remigiusz and Pipenbaher, Natasa and Pirini, Chrisoula and Pleskova, Zuzana and Polyakova, Mariya A. and Prentice, Honor C. and Reinecke, Jennifer and Reitalu, Triin and Pilar Rodriguez-Rojo, Maria and Rolecek, Jan and Ronkin, Vladimir and Rosati, Leonardo and Rosen, Ejvind and Ruprecht, Eszter and Rusina, Solvita and Sabovljevic, Marko and Maria Sanchez, Ana and Savchenko, Galina and Schuhmacher, Oliver and Skornik, Sonja and Sperandii, Marta Gaia and Staniaszek-Kik, Monika and Stevanovic-Dajic, Zora and Stock, Marin and Suchrow, Sigrid and Sutcliffe, Laura M. E. and Swacha, Grzegorz and Sykes, Martin and Szabo, Anna and Talebi, Amir and Tanase, Catalin and Terzi, Massimo and Tolgyesi, Csaba and Torca, Marta and Torok, Peter and Tothmeresz, Bela and Tsarevskaya, Nadezda and Tsiripidis, Ioannis and Tzonev, Rossen and Ushimaru, Atushi and Valko, Orsolya and van der Maarel, Eddy and Vanneste, Thomas and Vashenyak, Iuliia and Vassilev, Kiril and Viciani, Daniele and Villar, Luis and Virtanen, Risto and Kosic, Ivana Vitasovic and Wang, Yun and Weiser, Frank and Went, Julia and Wesche, Karsten and White, Hannah and Winkler, Manuela and Zaniewski, Piotr T. and Zhang, Hui and Ziv, Yaron and Znamenskiy, Sergey and Biurrun, Idoia},
  title     = {GrassPlot - a database of multi-scale plant diversity in Palaearctic grasslands},
  series = {Phytocoenologia},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {Phytocoenologia},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Cramer},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0340-269X},
  doi       = {10.1127/phyto/2018/0267},
  pages     = {331 -- 347},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {GrassPlot is a collaborative vegetation-plot database organised by the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG) and listed in the Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD ID EU-00-003). GrassPlot collects plot records (releves) from grasslands and other open habitats of the Palaearctic biogeographic realm. It focuses on precisely delimited plots of eight standard grain sizes (0.0001; 0.001;... 1,000 m(2)) and on nested-plot series with at least four different grain sizes. The usage of GrassPlot is regulated through Bylaws that intend to balance the interests of data contributors and data users. The current version (v. 1.00) contains data for approximately 170,000 plots of different sizes and 2,800 nested-plot series. The key components are richness data and metadata. However, most included datasets also encompass compositional data. About 14,000 plots have near-complete records of terricolous bryophytes and lichens in addition to vascular plants. At present, GrassPlot contains data from 36 countries throughout the Palaearctic, spread across elevational gradients and major grassland types. GrassPlot with its multi-scale and multi-taxon focus complements the larger international vegetationplot databases, such as the European Vegetation Archive (EVA) and the global database " sPlot". Its main aim is to facilitate studies on the scale-and taxon-dependency of biodiversity patterns and drivers along macroecological gradients. GrassPlot is a dynamic database and will expand through new data collection coordinated by the elected Governing Board. We invite researchers with suitable data to join GrassPlot. Researchers with project ideas addressable with GrassPlot data are welcome to submit proposals to the Governing Board.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Riedl2021,
  author    = {Riedl, Simon},
  title     = {Active tectonics in the Kenya Rift},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-53855},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-538552},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xi, 207},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Magmatische und tektonisch aktive Grabenzonen (Rifts) stellen die Vorstufen entstehender Plattengrenzen dar. Diese sich spreizenden tektonischen Provinzen zeichnen sich durch allgegenw{\"a}rtige Abschiebungen aus, und die r{\"a}umliche Verteilung, die Geometrie, und das Alter dieser Abschiebungen l{\"a}sst R{\"u}ckschl{\"u}sse auf die r{\"a}umlichen und zeitlichen Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen tektonischer Deformation, Magmatismus und langwelliger Krustendeformation in Rifts zu. Diese Arbeit konzentriert sich auf die St{\"o}rungsaktivit{\"a}t im Kenia-Rift des k{\"a}nozoischen Ostafrikanischen Grabensystems im Zeitraum zwischen dem mittleren Pleistoz{\"a}n und dem Holoz{\"a}n. Um die fr{\"u}hen Stadien der Entstehung kontinentaler Plattengrenzen zu untersuchen, wird in dieser Arbeit eine zeitlich gemittelte minimale Extensionsrate f{\"u}r den inneren Graben des N{\"o}rdlichen Kenia-Rifts (NKR) f{\"u}r die letzten 0,5 Mio Jahre abgeleitet. Die Analyse beruht auf Messungen mit Hilfe des digitalen TanDEM-X-H{\"o}henmodells, um die Abschiebungen entlang der vulkanisch-tektonischen Achse des inneren Grabens des NKR zu kartieren und deren Versatzbetr{\"a}ge zu bestimmen. Mithilfe von vorhandenen Geochronologiedaten der deformierten vulkanischen Einheiten sowie in dieser Arbeit erstellten ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar-Datierungen werden zeitlich gemittelte Extensionsraten berechnet. Die Auswertungen zeigen, dass im inneren Graben des NKR die langfristige Extensionsrate f{\"u}r mittelpleistoz{\"a}ne bis rezente St{\"o}rungen Mindestwerte von 1,0 bis 1,6 mm yr⁻¹ aufweist und lokal allerdings auch Werte bis zu 2,0 mm yr⁻¹ existieren. In Anbetracht der nahezu inaktiven Randst{\"o}rungen des NKR zeigt sich somit, dass sich die Extension auf die Region der aktiven vulkanisch-tektonischen Achse im inneren Graben konzentriert und somit ein fortgeschrittenes Stadium kontinentaler Extensionsprozesse im NKR vorliegt. In dieser Arbeit wird diese r{\"a}umlich fokussierte Extension zudem im Rahmen einer St{\"o}rungsanalyse der j{\"u}ngsten vulkanischen Erscheinungen des Kenia-Rifts betrachtet. Die Arbeit analysiert mithilfe von Gel{\"a}ndekartierungen und eines auf Luftbildern basierenden Gel{\"a}ndemodells die St{\"o}rungscharakteristika der etwa 36 tausend Jahre alten Menengai-Kaldera und der umliegenden Gebiete im zentralen Kenia-Rift. Im Allgemeinen sind die holoz{\"a}nen St{\"o}rungen innerhalb des Rifts reine, NNO-streichende Abschiebungen, die somit das gegenw{\"a}rtige tektonische Spannungsfeld wiederspiegeln; innerhalb der Menengai-Kaldera sind die jungen Strukturen jedoch von andauernder magmatischer Aktivit{\"a}t und von Aufdomung {\"u}berpr{\"a}gt. Die Kaldera befindet sich im Zentrum eines sich aktiv dehnenden Riftsegments und zusammen mit den anderen quart{\"a}ren Vulkanen des Kenia-Rifts lassen sich diese Bereiche als Kernpunkte der extensionalen St{\"o}rungsaktivit{\"a}t verstehen, die letztlich zu einer weiter entwickelten Phase magmengest{\"u}tzter Kontinentalseparation f{\"u}hren werden. Die bereits seit dem Terti{\"a}r andauernde St{\"o}rungsaktivit{\"a}t im Kenia-Rift f{\"u}hrt zur Zergliederung der gr{\"o}ßeren Rift-Senken in kleinere Segmente und beeinflusst die Sedimentologie und die Hydrologie dieser Riftbecken. Gegenw{\"a}rtig sind die meisten, durch St{\"o}rungen begrenzten Becken des Kenia-Rifts hydrologisch isoliert, sie waren aber w{\"a}hrend feuchter Klimaphasen hydrologisch miteinander verbunden; in dieser Arbeit untersuche ich deshalb auch diese hydrologische Verbindung der Rift-Becken f{\"u}r die Zeit der Afrikanischen Feuchteperiode des fr{\"u}hen Holoz{\"a}ns. Mithilfe der Analyse von digitalen Gel{\"a}ndemodellen, unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung von geomorphologischen Anzeigern f{\"u}r Seespiegelhochst{\"a}nde, Radiokarbondatierungen und einer {\"U}bersicht {\"u}ber Fossiliendaten konnten zwei kaskadierende Flusssysteme aus diesen Daten abgeleitet werden: eine Flusskaskade in Richtung S{\"u}den und eine in Richtung Norden. Beide Kaskaden haben die derzeit isolierten Becken w{\"a}hrend des fr{\"u}hen Holoz{\"a}ns durch {\"u}berlaufende Seen und eingeschnittene Schluchten miteinander verbunden. Diese hydrologische Verbindung f{\"u}hrte zu der Ausbreitung aquatischer Fauna entlang des Rifts, und gleichzeitig stellte die Wasserscheide zwischen den beiden Flusssystemen den einzigen terrestrischen Ausbreitungskorridor dar, der eine {\"U}berquerung des Kenia-Rifts erm{\"o}glichte. Diese tektonisch-geomorphologische Rekonstruktion erkl{\"a}rt die heute isolierten Vorkommen nilotischer Fischarten in den Riftseen Kenias sowie die isolierten Vorkommen Guineo-Congolischer S{\"a}ugetiere in W{\"a}ldern {\"o}stlich des Kenia-Rifts, die sich {\"u}ber die Wasserscheide im Kenia-Rift ausbreiten konnten. Auf l{\"a}ngeren Zeitskalen sind solche Phasen hydrologischer Verbindung und Phasen der Isolation wiederholt aufgetreten und zeigen sich in wechselnden pal{\"a}o{\"o}kologischen Indikatoren in Sedimentbohrkernen. Hier stelle ich einen Sedimentbohrkern aus dem Koora-Becken des S{\"u}dlichen Kenia-Rifts vor, der einen Datensatz der Pal{\"a}o-Umweltbedingungen der letzten 1 Million Jahre beinhaltet. Dieser Datensatz zeigt, dass etwa vor 400 tausend Jahren die zuvor relativ stabilen Umweltbedingungen zum Erliegen kamen und tektonische, hydrologische und {\"o}kologische Ver{\"a}nderungen dazu f{\"u}hrten, dass die Wasserverf{\"u}gbarkeit, die Grasland-Vergesellschaftungen und die Bedeckung durch Baumvegetation zunehmend st{\"a}rkeren und h{\"a}ufigeren Schwankungen unterlagen. Diese großen Ver{\"a}nderungen fallen zeitlich mit Phasen zusammen, in denen das s{\"u}dliche Becken des Kenia-Rifts von vulkanischer und tektonischer Aktivit{\"a}t besonders betroffen war. Die vorliegende Arbeit zeigt deshalb deutlich, inwiefern die tektonischen und geomorphologischen Gegebenheiten im Zuge einer zeitlich langanhaltenden Extension die Hydrologie, die Pal{\"a}o-Umweltbedingungen sowie die Biodiversit{\"a}t einer Riftzone beeinflussen k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StantonBooneSotoShoenderetal.2017,
  author    = {Stanton, Richard A. and Boone, Wesley W. and Soto-Shoender, Jose and Fletcher, Robert J. and Blaum, Niels and McCleery, Robert A.},
  title     = {Shrub encroachment and vertebrate diversity},
  series = {Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1466-822X},
  doi       = {10.1111/geb.12675},
  pages     = {368 -- 379},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Aim: Across the planet, grass-dominated biomes are experiencing shrub encroachment driven by atmospheric CO2 enrichment and land-use change. By altering resource structure and availability, shrub encroachment may have important impacts on vertebrate communities. We sought to determine the magnitude and variability of these effects across climatic gradients, continents, and taxa, and to learn whether shrub thinning restores the structure of vertebrate communities. Location: Worldwide. Time period: Contemporary. Major taxa studied: Terrestrial vertebrates. Methods: We estimated relationships between percentage shrub cover and the structure of terrestrial vertebrate communities (species richness, Shannon diversity and community abundance) in experimentally thinned and unmanipulated shrub-encroached grass-dominated biomes using systematic review and meta-analyses of 43 studies published from 1978 to 2016. We modelled the effects of continent, biome, mean annual precipitation, net primary productivity and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) on the relationship between shrub cover and vertebrate community structure. Results: Species richness, Shannon diversity and total abundance had no consistent relationship with shrub encroachment and experimental thinning did not reverse encroachment effects on vertebrate communities. However, some effects of shrub encroachment on vertebrate communities differed with net primary productivity, amongst vertebrate groups, and across continents. Encroachment had negative effects on vertebrate diversity at low net primary productivity. Mammalian and herpetofaunal diversity decreased with shrub encroachment. Shrub encroachment also had negative effects on species richness and total abundance in Africa but positive effects in North America. Main conclusions: Biodiversity conservation and mitigation efforts responding to shrub encroachment should focus on low-productivity locations, on mammals and herpetofauna, and in Africa. However, targeted research in neglected regions such as central Asia and India will be needed to fill important gaps in our knowledge of shrub encroachment effects on vertebrates. Additionally, our findings provide an impetus for determining the mechanisms associated with changes in vertebrate diversity and abundance in shrub-encroached grass-dominated biomes.},
  language  = {en}
}