@article{PrengelFriebertshaeuserLanger2013,
  author    = {Prengel, Annedore and Friebertsh{\"a}user, Barbara and Langer, Antje},
  title     = {Perspektiven qualitativer Forschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft - eine Einfuhrung},
  series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  edition   = {4., durchges. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {17 -- 42},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{UhlendotffPrengel2013,
  author    = {Uhlendotff, Harald and Prengel, Annedore},
  title     = {Forschungsperspektiven quantitativer Methoden im Verh{\"a}ltnis zu qualitativen Methoden},
  series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  edition   = {4., durchges. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {137 -- 149},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Prengel2013,
  author    = {Prengel, Annedore},
  title     = {Praxisforschung in professioneller P{\"a}dagogik},
  series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  edition   = {4., durchgesehene Auflage},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {785 -- 802},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Grell2013,
  author    = {Grell, Petra},
  title     = {Forschende Lernwerkstatt},
  series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  edition   = {4., durchgesehene Auflage},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {887 -- 896},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Oswald2013,
  author    = {Oswald, Hans},
  title     = {Was heißt qualitativ forschen? Warnungen, Fehlerquellen, M{\"o}glichkeiten},
  series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  edition   = {4., durchgesehene Auflage},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {183 -- 204},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchruenderLenzen2013,
  author    = {Schr{\"u}nder-Lenzen, Agi},
  title     = {Triangulation - ein Konzept zur Qualit{\"a}tssicherung von Forschung},
  series = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  edition   = {4., durchgesehene Auflage},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {149 -- 158},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-48342,
  title     = {Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft},
  editor    = {Friebertsh{\"a}user, Barbara and Langer, Antje and Prengel, Annedore},
  edition   = {4., durchgesehene Auflage},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  isbn      = {978-3-7799-0799-2},
  pages     = {1000},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Qualitative Forschung leistet mit einem differenzierten Methodenrepertoire einen zentralen Beitrag zur Empirie in der Erziehungswissenschaft. Das Handbuch f{\"u}hrt umfassend in das breite Spektrum qualitativer Forschungszug{\"a}nge ein. Der erste Teil bietet eine grundlegende Einf{\"u}hrung in qualitative Forschung, reflektiert ihre Bedeutung und Erkenntnispotentiale, zeichnet historische Entwicklungen nach und legt theoretische Grundlagen dar. Der zweite Teil stellt die wichtigsten methodischen Forschungskonzeptionen qualitativer erziehungswissenschaftlicher Forschung vor. Der dritte Teil f{\"u}hrt in Strategien f{\"u}r Erhebungen und Auswertungen ein. Die Aufs{\"a}tze des vierten Teils widmen sich dem forschenden Umgang mit visuellen Quellen und Medien. Der f{\"u}nfte Teil stellt eine Auswahl gegenstandsbezogener qualitativer Forschungsans{\"a}tze vor. Abschließend folgen Ans{\"a}tze der Praxis-, Aktions- und Handlungsforschung und n{\"u}tzliche Informationen und Hinweise f{\"u}r die Planung und Durchf{\"u}hrung von Forschungsvorhaben. Das Handbuch richtet sich an Promovierende, Forschende, Lehrende und Studierende in den Erziehungs- und Sozialwissenschaften. Es bietet P{\"a}dagoginnen und P{\"a}dagogen Informationen {\"u}ber Methoden systematischer Praxisforschung und tr{\"a}gt damit zur St{\"a}rkung und Innovation qualitativer Forschungszug{\"a}nge und zur Weiterentwicklung der methodischen Standards bei.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MietznerKamprath2013,
  author    = {Mietzner, Dana and Kamprath, Martin},
  title     = {A competence portfolio for professionals in the creative industries},
  series = {Creativity and innovation management},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Creativity and innovation management},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0963-1690},
  doi       = {10.1111/caim.12026},
  pages     = {280 -- 294},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Within the last decade, the role of the Creative Industries has grown to become an important part of the economic system. The increasing acceleration of new developments in media and ICT technologies greatly affected the Creative Industries' dynamic with a direct impact on the people working in this sector. Since only a few studies focus on competences needs, more or less isolated from the trends within the industry, we address the topic of individual competence shifts in the turbulent environment of the Creative Industries. We investigated the trends regarding competence shifts and their implications as well as the competences which are essential for creative professionals. We conducted a broad literature review as well as a qualitative study, which includes interviews and workshops with industry experts on trends within the Creative Industries and corresponding dimensions and demands for competences. We present four requirements that call for shifts in the education of competences. Based on the discussion of requirements, we present a competence portfolio for the Creative Industries along the dimensions of professional, methodological and personal-social competences. The portfolio clearly indicates which competences should be taken into consideration for the development of curricula and study programmes in the education of creative professionals. A generalization of these findings suggests new challenges for companies relying on creative professionals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{RokvenSiebenHalmanetal.2013,
  author    = {Rokven, Josja and Sieben, Inge and Halman, Loek and Uhlenwinkel, Anke and Brooks, Clare and Caner, Havva Ay{\c{s}}e and Seggie, Fatma Nevra and Baars, Daniela and Dal, Adem and Şim{\c{s}}ek, Esra and G{\"u}ltekin, Emrah and Karaduman, Dursun and Weiser, Ines and Ak{\c{c}}ay, P{\i}nar and D{\"u}{\c{s}}er, Ece and Nozon, Hannes and Strehmel, Christian and Groell, Janine and Stern, Caroline and Turgut, Pelin and Demirci, Kadriye and Erdem, Didem Tuğ{\c{c}}e and Kanera, Elisa and Erbil, Fethiye and Rogge, Lisa and Şen, Nazile and Siwick, Markus and Pažick{\´y}, Michal and Chlapik, Matej and Liškov{\´a}, Lenka and van den Broek, Carola and Willemse, Marloes and Malchova, Lenka and Majer, Zdenko and Laban, Pieter and Bechtold, Sander and Hogendoorn, Thirza and Koh{\´u}tov{\´a}, Vivien and Potočanov{\´a}, Katar{\´i}na and Medved', Jakub and Matisovskŷ, Tom{\´a}ŝ and Suijkerbuijk, Maico and Povalačov{\´a}, Diana and Leffers, Marjon and Scheepens, Evelien and Kools, Hanneke and Oleksakova, Daniela and White, R{\´o}is{\´i}n},
  title     = {Teaching about the family values of Europeans : critical reflections from the third student exchange of the EVE-project},
  editor    = {Uhlenwinkel, Anke},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-234-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-64412},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {134},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The European Values Education (EVE) project is a large-scale, cross-national, and longitudinal survey research programme on basic human values. The main topic of its second stage was family values in Europe. Student teachers of several universities in Europe worked together in multicultural exchange groups. Their results are presented in this issue.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DelgrandeSchaubTompitsetal.2013,
  author    = {Delgrande, James and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan},
  title     = {A model-theoretic approach to belief change in answer set programming},
  series = {ACM transactions on computational logic},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {ACM transactions on computational logic},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1529-3785},
  doi       = {10.1145/2480759.2480766},
  pages     = {46},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {We address the problem of belief change in (nonmonotonic) logic programming under answer set semantics. Our formal techniques are analogous to those of distance-based belief revision in propositional logic. In particular, we build upon the model theory of logic programs furnished by SE interpretations, where an SE interpretation is a model of a logic program in the same way that a classical interpretation is a model of a propositional formula. Hence we extend techniques from the area of belief revision based on distance between models to belief change in logic programs. We first consider belief revision: for logic programs P and Q, the goal is to determine a program R that corresponds to the revision of P by Q, denoted P * Q. We investigate several operators, including (logic program) expansion and two revision operators based on the distance between the SE models of logic programs. It proves to be the case that expansion is an interesting operator in its own right, unlike in classical belief revision where it is relatively uninteresting. Expansion and revision are shown to satisfy a suite of interesting properties; in particular, our revision operators satisfy all or nearly all of the AGM postulates for revision. We next consider approaches for merging a set of logic programs, P-1,...,P-n. Again, our formal techniques are based on notions of relative distance between the SE models of the logic programs. Two approaches are examined. The first informally selects for each program P-i those models of P-i that vary the least from models of the other programs. The second approach informally selects those models of a program P-0 that are closest to the models of programs P-1,...,P-n. In this case, P-0 can be thought of as a set of database integrity constraints. We examine these operators with regards to how they satisfy relevant postulate sets. Last, we present encodings for computing the revision as well as the merging of logic programs within the same logic programming framework. This gives rise to a direct implementation of our approach in terms of off-the-shelf answer set solvers. These encodings also reflect the fact that our change operators do not increase the complexity of the base formalism.},
  language  = {en}
}