@misc{DuevelEhmigMcCalletal.2024,
  author    = {D{\"u}vel, Pia and Ehmig, Ulrike and McCall, Jeremiah and Unceta G{\´o}mez, Luis and Bakogianni, Anastasia and Fischer, Jens and Serrano Lozano, David and Amb{\"u}hl, Annemarie and Matz, Alicia and Brinker, Wolfram and Mach, Jonas Konstantin and Mancini, Mattia and Werner, Eva},
  title     = {Spring Issue},
  series = {thersites},
  volume    = {2024},
  journal   = {thersites},
  number    = {18},
  editor    = {Amb{\"u}hl, Annemarie and Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Rollinger, Christian and Walde, Christine},
  issn      = {2364-7612},
  doi       = {10.34679/thersites.vol18},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HartmannMoellerKrause2015,
  author    = {Hartmann, Tilo and M{\"o}ller, Ingrid and Krause, Christina},
  title     = {Factors underlying male and female use of violent video games},
  series = {New media \& society},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {New media \& society},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4448},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461444814533067},
  pages     = {1777 -- 1794},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Research has consistently shown that males play violent video games more frequently than females, but factors underlying this gender gap have not been examined to date. This approach examines the assumption that males play violent video games more because they anticipate more enjoyment and less guilt from engaging in virtual violence than females. This may be because males are less empathetic, tend to morally justify physical violence more and have a greater need for sensation and aggression in video game play than females. Results of a path model based on survey data of 444 respondents and using multi-step multiple mediation analyses confirm these assumptions. Taken together, the findings of this study shed further light on the gender gap in violent video game use.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{HartmannMoellerKrause2015,
  author    = {Hartmann, Tilo and M{\"o}ller, Ingrid and Krause, Christina},
  title     = {Factors underlying male and female use of violent video games},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {394},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404513},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Research has consistently shown that males play violent video games more frequently than females, but factors underlying this gender gap have not been examined to date. This approach examines the assumption that males play violent video games more because they anticipate more enjoyment and less guilt from engaging in virtual violence than females. This may be because males are less empathetic, tend to morally justify physical violence more and have a greater need for sensation and aggression in video game play than females. Results of a path model based on survey data of 444 respondents and using multi-step multiple mediation analyses confirm these assumptions. Taken together, the findings of this study shed further light on the gender gap in violent video game use.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Richter2010,
  author    = {Richter, Angelika},
  title     = {Klassifikationen von Computerspielen},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-076-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-43901},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {145},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Klassifikationen von Computerspielen widmet sich den Begriffen, mit denen Computerspiele zu Klassifikationszwecken versehen werden. Eine repr{\"a}sentative Auswahl an derartigen Klassifikationsmodellen, die die Arbeiten von Designern, Journalisten, P{\"a}dagogen, Laien und expliziten Computerspielforschern abdeckt, wird vorgestellt und hinsichtlich ihrer Anwendbarkeit zur eindeutigen Bestimmung konkreter Spiele bewertet. Dabei zeigen sich zwei grundlegend verschiedene Herangehensweisen an die Problematik: „Kategorisierungen" stellen feste Kategorien auf, in die einzelne Spiel eindeutig einsortiert werden sollen, w{\"a}hrend „Typologien" die einzelnen Elemente von Spielen untersuchen und klassifizieren. Beide Ans{\"a}tze werden analysiert und ihre jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteile aufgezeigt. Da offensichtlich wird, dass die Klassifikation von Computerspielen in bedeutendem Maße vom jeweiligen zugrunde liegenden Verst{\"a}ndnis davon, was ein „Computerspiel" sei, abh{\"a}ngt, ist der Untersuchung der Klassifikationsmodelle eine Betrachtung dieser problematischen Begriffsdefinition vorangestellt, die beispielhaft an vier ausgew{\"a}hlten Aspekten durchgef{\"u}hrt wird.},
  language  = {de}
}